We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Thank you Vii.
Rhetorical question really - Do we think Sir Mick has considered into his comments any value as provided by the interest held in Cornish Lithium?
ViI Thanks for reminding us of Sir Micks Comments. I remember this being shared before, but couldn't remember the comments. I think at the time someone worked out a rough share price based on his buy in and these comments for his exit.. can anyone recall this?
Vii.
Thank you for taking the time to respond with reasoned and easy to understand comments.
Its refreshing to see someone being civil on Lse... No doubt when CUSN starts getting more attention this board will also be diluted by D heads.
Yes..... I had read the comments on here and I was aware that it wasn't the best for us little PI's, bet others won't be tho.
To be fair, I used to being manipulated and given the short straw on the stock market, I just hope, in time my investment returns a little more than I paid for it, which, i hope, will happen.
Gotta be in it to win it.... (and all that).
Raised £1,000,000 within 30 mins.
Ps lovelyboy, nice to see a fellow 'Euarasian' with an interest here too.
Don't post or read much here these days, but a quick thanks to all the regular contributors who are providing news and opinions on a daily basis here.
Its still all looking extremely positive for Cornish Mining., whether it be copper, tin or lithium!
Knocker and VIIThank you very much for that link regarding Mick and his exit plan.Interesting to see such things as give an idea of the potential he sees in the project and also helps give an idea of a reasonable exit for us too!My life has been consumed last couple of weeks with my digital mining exploits which have taken a turn for the worse.As always.. Thank you for your continued commentary.
Must admit, I didn't read the TR1. Just assumed it was Sir Mick... Is it not?
Tygra.
I agree with your comment and am saddened how this forum is now a total lack of objectivity and conversations.
I would much prefer to read 20 sensible posts which stated arguments both sides. There is either Mega Ramp or Mega De-ramp, frustration or re-guritation of old information.
What I don't agree with is basically being told, as a shareholder, i am funding the Russian War efforts. I invested long before this "military operation" was in progress based on the ongoing negotiations and on a risk reward basis.
I can't stand the utter craziness that revolves around some people here - last night was a prime example - remaining nameless, instead of going, "thanks for the clarification regarding the website i now understand", it just turned into utter vileness!
On the other hand, i don't need to watch TV for Drama, i just come here!
All the best.
We need to remain objective, but we must also remember than EUA probably needs to keep its nose clean at the moment, which is why there is silence and no communication from the BOD.
I miss coming here, or twitter for sensbile conversations and updates. I cannot abide by such vileness as being told "as a shareholder, i am funding the Russian War efforts. I invested long before this "military operation" was in progress"...
Wow.
We have seen both way back when, Google indexing search both which prove that this is a old profile page, which is still online, but has an updated banner under it which reflects the next conference.
Cleaver beasts these internet website making people...
Its OK tho, the photo (taken on a mobile phone) of a computer screen showing a website is damping evidence.
FYI holding volume down and the power button takes a screenshot on your phone...
These most recent consipiries are mental..
Who in their right minds thinks that the LSE BB can move markets?
In the grand scheme of things we are small fry individual investors...
Wow.
Yes, there is a lot of potentially false positivity around - realistically we all know this is a dangerous share to be in at the moment riskwise!
However, is it a scam.....i doubt it. Too. Many big names Involved says otherwise..
Surely if it was one of the large companies eua works with would have publically stated such a point and ended all relatip ships.
These theories are utter cobsipircy.
Wow.
Kira - politely - just leave the board.You appear to upset a shed load of the other users here - they react, you react back and it turns into petty school playground BSWe all know its a massive risk being here at the moment, but your told you so attitude is a bit much now. This is the first (and last) time I will address you. Hopefully the other board members will follow suit and you will get bored soon and leave us to our own conversations.
Hes been in the EUA playbook for a while - his name first appeared (Assuming they dropped the Rosneft name due to sanctions) on the RNS on 31st December under the "Agreement signed with H4Energy Joint-Stock Company ("H4Energy") Tag
· Artem Matyushok, former vice-president M&A for Rosneft, and former Shell alumnus, where he participated in several development projects and later was involved in Shell's incipient Energy transition initiative;
https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/EUA/hydrogen-and-ammonia-strategy-7govnm7zitkyfz5.html
Plot thickens..... M&A to get deal over line, and then actively involvied in EUA 2.0 me thinks.
Although there is a line which reads:
"Moreover, exceptions are made for transactions
which are strictly necessary for the purchase, import or transport of fossil fuels, in particular coal, oil and natural gas, as well as titanium, aluminum, copper, nickel, palladium and iron ore from or through Russia into the EU"....
Basically we need another RNS which states the current sanctions doesn't affect us...
Im not surprised we were suspended...
First Google Result...
Artem Matyushok
Head of M&A and Business Development, Rosneft
Then quick google on "rosneft sanctions 2022" First Hit
https://sanctionsnews.bakermckenzie.com/eu-introduces-additional-sanctions-against-russia/
Restrictions on transactions with certain state-owned enterprises
The new regulation provides for a blanket ban on directly or indirectly engaging in any transaction with: (a) entities listed in Annex XIX; (b) their non-EU subsidiaries directly or indirectly owned for more than 50%; and (c) persons acting on behalf of (a) and/or (b) above.
The following companies are currently included in Annex XIX:
...
ROSNEFT
...
There is also reference to:
There is a wind-down period until 15 May 2022...Which ties in (the the day) with our suspension RNS
I genuinely don't know what is going on anymore, its either gonna be epic and a total disaster!
Its the start to the end ... High or Low, its been an emotional roller coaster being invested here.
The highs (the rockets after the previous suspension, the Rowka Saga, the Bots, The jubberings, the JV, The potential significant dividend).
The Lows ( Russia's madman), the last suspension, cryptic RNS's with lack of information, the bashers and naysayers.
Either way - its time for closure. Good luck to whomever you are and however you hold your position (long or short) and your opinions/facts either side.
Time for closure I hope....