RE: Positive5 Aug 2021 15:54
@Bugs14 - 'GM disagrees with a takeover, decides to bow out and Big Pharma places its pawn as CEO'. Perhaps not far from the truth. A TO would not necessarly be a bad thing and a large Phara would carry far more clout and have more prestige -- they would certainly been held to account for the collapse in the SP and heads may have rolled. Many shareholders here, like me, will be hoping this is the case as it appear the only way for many of us to perhaps claw back our losses. I do not believe a DHSC settlement will restore full value to shareholders.