Member Info for myfirstmillion

Lawrence didn't get out with his reputation intact, at least not in my mind! He was the one in charge the majority of the time that this began to fail. It was his ethos to not care about the shareprice" as he constantly raised money at ever decreasing prices diluting us to oblivion, that caused the most damage in my view and I'll never forget that. Especially his bloody mindedness that what he was doing made perfect sense when I could see that it made absolutely no sense. By the time he left the damage had been inflicted but just for good measure we were left with the completely incompetent and disinterested Myles to destroy the last vestiges of shareholder value. RIP Europa Metals.

There's no anger on my part bots them amount I put into TLOU is dwarfed by my other investments. I'm quite content to wait this out and am confident of making a profit here. You however are most definitely not content and given that you were invested at the shares highs you’ll be waiting a lot longer than me to see any profit ;)

Donkey if you was that great a sage you would have sold years ago when you was still posting as 'Donkey' and bought masses more shares at current levels to push your average buy price right down, you didn't which is why you continue to bleat on day after day. You got it just as wrong as everybody else actually you got it more wrong because you never believed and STILL didn't act upon your doubts! That makes you incredibly stupid and not someone that anyone should listen to or follow, much less eulogize about!

Bots that's a pretty pathetic post and totally disingenuous. Anyone who's seen and remembers your posting history over those 7 years knows that you didn't try to warn people. What you did for years was use every scaremongering tactic you could, you told lies and snatched at literally ANYTHING no matter how tenuous the link to try and discredit TLOU.

It wasn't 'information' and it didn't come from a genuine desire to inform anyone. It was a concerted effort year after year on all platforms and under many guises as usernames got banned. You continue that tactic to this day. If you were a genuine shareholder you would have a posting history of being positive for a year or two followed by a point of disillusionment and THEN negativity but no one remembers you EVER being positive. It was all snide smarmy comments, disinformation and using stuff that had precious little or nothing to do with the company to foster a negative discourse.

You're a crafty, manipulative and malicious actor with an inflated self important ego and a 'poor me' attitude that really displays the depths of your vanity. That is why no one now cares or listens to all the tripe you continue to peddle.

Bots it's of no interest or concern to me. I don't care that people were hyping the company up and you fell for it, equally I don't care whether you were wrong or right. I make my investment decisions based upon what I think of a company and if I make a mistake well that's on me. What I do care about is what the company are doing now and how long it will be before we get into production and earning some cash.

Jesus bots could you be any more patronising! I'm sure most folk on here posting and lurking understand the situation. The point you seem to miss is that it's pointless bleating on about it year after year. Sell up or just accept it for what it is.

Just topped up with a cheeky 5 mill buy, first time in a couple of years that I've added

your wife has never said that to me ;)

yet again you misrepresent the situation. as bl explained himself in a recent interview when talking about the two deals that fell through, he can't just make **** up as you'd like people to believe. everything he says has to be and is verifiable by the nomad. maybe you should contact them if you don't believe bl. i suspect you're one of those people that doesn't believe anything if it goes against your agenda.

I think you're just as guilty of posting false information 10% - 15% really? If that isn't scaremongering I don't know what is. The other holes that were drilled were mostly on land of the 11 only 2 were drilled offshore and nowhere near where they should have been drilled! You know this so why paint it the way you do? because it suits your agenda. Even those eleven wells all showed evidence of oil and and active hydrocarbon system despite being drilled in completely the wrong place.

Technology has moved on even if you haven't. 2D and 3D seismic and satellite imaging have thrown up where the drills really need to be dug and Coliibri is the lower hanging fruit based upon size and chance of success that has been independently estimated much higher than the figures you're banding around and if we can get a piston core survey done that chance of success will only go up if the survey shows promise.

If you want to make a fortune on AIM this is exactly the kind of play you should be putting money into where there's an asymmetric risk to reward. There have been oil seeps found both onshore and offshore, drilling albeit in the wrong places have indicated an active hydro carbon system, the geology is right for the presence of oil. Everything points to it being there and it isn't just UOG or Bryan Larkin for that matter that think so. Independent auditors have looked at the data and agree as did two majors who were ready to sign on the dotted line. If it wasn't for a bit of bad luck in that they changed corporate strategy we'd be flying now and this whole conversation would be moot. With the orange idiot in the oval office and the success of other nations close by the tide may have just turned in our favour, at some point I'm certain this is gonna get drilled, as the last remaining large frontier basin in the region it has to. Anyone invested would see a substantial rerate on news of a deal, probably a decent move after the piston core survey permit comes through, another rerate if the piston core survey shows promise, a further rerate on a decision to drill and the jackpot if they stay until we strike oil. So there are many potential rerates and many potential exit points for peeps to take huge profits should they wish. Stating it as a black and white outcome with a small chance of success is utterly misleading and not an honest representation of the opportunity here.

* just seems to always be something with this company

"A hose pipe down" this doesn't seem plausible. Haven't we spent the last, what is it 5 years? Dewatering these coal bed seams. I think the last thing I'd want to do would be to start putting more water back in! I don't get how they can't seem to get this thing up and running. Tony is supposed to be the man, been there done it (twice before) but can't seem to get the gas to power over the line. Surely if he was that good he would have anticipated too much water from geological surveys or this finings problem? It can't all be brand new to him and he's had god knows how long to figure all this out. It just always seems to 'something with this company. And what of the bl00dy connection to the grid I joked some months back that it was like the Microsoft 'minute' countdown time that actually takes 3 minutes even after it says 100% loaded but actually it's worse coz we're still after all this time only 90% complete. I despair and to be honest it's now becoming a bit of a joke but not a very funny one. Wake up Brad he ain't Saint Tony he's an average ceo at best in my book, the quality he has is stickability and determination which might just be enough to see us through but my god is it taking some time!

JohnnySmiths why are you trying so hard to get people not to buy? I find that very suspect, especially with the amount of buying we've seen here of late and the good news of the licence extension and getting money owed back feom Egypt. Today we broke a resistance level so will in all likelihood continue to move higher. People are here to make money, follow the money follow the trades. The risk compared to the rewards here is miniscule while the rewards are off the chart!

Haha funny that I had him and Brad on filter for the best part of two years, as we look to be going into production in 2025 I took them both off filter about a month ago. In the spirit of new beginnings and all that. It's been absolutely no surprise to me to see them still bickering over essentially nothing but who's opinion is right. I called this 3 years back when I said they're like opposite sides of the same coin. Donkey will always be overly negative and stubborn that he's right and Brad will always be overly optimistic and equally as stubborn that he's right. They're feted to argue for eternity neither ever accepting any validity in the others argument. I actually find it comical but maybe that's coz I've had a nice break from it. Another couple of months and maybe they'll wear me down again with their collective nonsense but for now I'll keep them around as we're coming into an interesting period with TLOU and I want to hear as many opinions as possible.

Brad I said exactly what you thought I didn't say. You assumed lse meant this website, I meant the London stock exchange. I know they delisted and that was exactly the point I was making. That they were no longer on the London stock exchange so why have links to the London stock exchange rns's on their website. As they have had dual listing throughout I'm sure there are asx equivalents and in time I'm sure they will appear including the full rns equivalent historical links.

Bots it's not 'rubbish' it's an opinion just like yours, the fact it doesn't fit your negative narrative doesn't make it necessarily wrong. First off yes the company can control what goes on their website and as far as I can ascertain they are allowed to still use rns links BUT why would you want to? If they were only previously listed on the London stock exchange then yes it would make sense but they have always had dual listing so all those rns announcements will be available on the asx equivalent. Why would you post two lots of links to two different exchanges one of which you're no longer listed on? That's sure to confuse the hell out of any new investors looking in. Also it's not a professional corporate look to have links to the London stock exchange if you have nothing to do with them anymore. Why are the new links not up yet? I don't know but it could be for many reasons. I'm sure in time the full historical asx equivalent links will appear.

More telling is the fact of how you've jumped on this and seized it as something to try and tarnish the company with on a public bb. Instead why not just email the company to find out?

The answer is probably very simple bots I'm gonna guess that the website previously pointed to LSE rns announcements but as they're no longer listed on the LSE they've probably taken those links out and are in the process of getting links that point to the ASX exchange

Well for starters that video is definitely Ai, secondly everything stated in the video isn't accurate as they state that the licence extension is to January 2026 it isn't it's until January 2028 and thirdly I didn't specifically accuse you of working for Tullow. I said this company has had to endure deramping and personal attacks against the CEO for years and these were most probably from former Tullow or perhaps even current Tullow employees given how bitter and personal they are but either way this was a general comment on the incessant nature of the attacks. I never said you worked for Tullow.

Mate it's you that is thick, this was your words from your last post before I posted and I quote

"Let this end the debate. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqKS1tlZnCM, the company are delaying partner search, that's a second source confirming what I've been saying."

That whole video is Ai generated, are you denying that?

If anyone is taking Johnny Smiths seriously please don't! The link he's provided as 'research' is a video he's made himself using an Ai tool. You give the Ai a summary or asked the Ai to research it itself and then produce a 10 minute 'discussion' video, where two Ai voices talk about the subject. Which is why they incorrectly say the licence is until January 2026 when it is in fact until January 2028.

This is the guy that has just created a new account and become an instant expert because he's mate down the pub is in an oil and gas company. There's more red flags to this guy than an F1 pile up.

This is what this company has had to deal with for years d1ckheads trying their best to knock the company and disparage the CEO at every turn. All bitter and twisted (probably ex Tullow) who so want BL to fail the feeling is visceral in every bad mouthed post they make and it seems they're now getting so desperate they're employing dodgy underhand tactics like Ai videos as 'evidence'. I'd say you couldn't make it up but that's exactly what they are doing!

The fact is that two companies previously were already close to signing a deal. One just before Christmas and one some 18 months ago. Bryan has said that the piston core survey will be paid for by the company that signs a deal. Which is why he also said getting the two year extension (with 9 months left still to run on the old licence) would make an attractive proposition even more attractive as the cost of the piston core survey can be spread over a longer time period should the investee compnany want to do this. This isn't opinion it is fact that can be checked by watching his interview. So don't listen to this nonsense about a deal being at least 10 months away. The reality is it could drop at any time.

First revenue Q3 let's hope so... it's been a long wait.