RE: Re Market popping in27 Mar 2019 11:41
Absolutely Rebess!
Quite so, the Judge in one of the court sessions stated that their is no evidence of any corruption or wrong doing on the part of Centamin.
30 Oct 2012 Centamin are the latest in a number of companies being hauled before the courts over contracts signed with the previous Mubarak regime.
A lawyer, Hamdy Fakharany, who filed the case against Centamin claiming the returns to the government were not high enough, told Reuters:
The ruling brings back Egypt's gold back [home].
We will take an official copy of the ruling and inform the government, the mine should be closed now. This is a very positive ruling in favour of the Egyptian people.
Since then Hamdy has become a convicted felon who is now living in exile to avoid imprisonment and he has admitted that he can produce no evidence to support his claim which is based on nothing more than inaccurate innuendo
Would EMRA be in partnership and accepting 50% of the profit from a corrupt company?
Egyptian officials flag up Sukari as an example of why international mining companies should apply for new concessions and Centamin has an unresolved court case hanging over iit?
Why when there is no evidence to support the felons case against Centamin should it be necessary to wait for a ruling on Law 32, the court should b reconvened and chuck the case out
if anything Centamin should be suing Hamby for compensation for the damage his lies have caused to the reputation and value of the company, why aren't they?