Member Info for MrGMan

A familiar pattern is playing out again today: several accounts are flooding the board with low‑value posts, pushing genuine technical discussion out of sight.

Why LSE’s moderation team continues to allow this is unclear. Some suggest it’s tolerated because higher post volume increases advertising revenue — but ultimately, only LSE can answer that.

For the benefit of newer posters:

Porters1, Titanasaurus, Anti_Venom, and a number of similar accounts show no interest in Predator’s operations, data, or technical analysis. Their activity is consistently aimed at disrupting informed discussion and burying useful posts beneath noise.

Staying aware of this behaviour helps keep the board focused on factual, technical content rather than manufactured distraction.

Thanks Keith that’s a really useful clarification. Appreciate you highlighting it so clearly.

You’re over engineering the downside here while underplaying the strategic position PRD has built.

Trinidad doesn’t need to be a “bread winner” to matter. It’s already a cash flowing, improving asset base in a rising oil environment, and SC 3 is a genuine catalyst, not a lottery ticket. The point isn’t perfection — it’s a steady contribution while the bigger pieces move.

The 350m headroom keeps getting framed as a threat, when in reality it’s optionality. Any serious partner knows the value of the basin, the scale of the prize, and the fact that PRD has already de risked the geology. That shifts the negotiation dynamic massively. A partner doesn’t get to walk in and dictate terms when the data room shows a basin opening discovery with a national strategic need behind it. And Morocco’s need for domestic gas isn’t theoretical — it’s immediate, structural and politically important. That’s leverage.

Everyone keeps jumping to “they’ll take the whole 350m at a discount” as if that’s the only possible structure. It isn’t. Farm ins, staged equity, carried work programmes, back ended payments, capex recovery mechanisms — there are multiple ways to structure a deal that protect existing shareholders while accelerating development. PRD has been very clear that they’re negotiating from strength, not desperation.

Yes PG is a big shareholder and definitely won’t sit quietly while someone tries to bulldoze the cap table, that’s absolutely plain to see from his interviews – he will be a very shrewd, no nonsense negotiator.

And yes, the drill decides the ultimate value — but that’s the whole point. You want to be positioned before the drill, not after. The revised ITR, the seismic, the data, the geological model — all of it points to a basin with scale. Flowing gas is the final confirmation, not the starting point.

Reducing and hoping to buy back cheaper is a traders strategy not the sign of a LTH, but it’s also a gamble that the market will misprice a deal that could be transformational. If the partner is credible and the structure is sensible, the market reaction could just as easily be the complete opposite.

For me, the risk/reward still sits firmly on the highly positive side. A smaller slice of a much bigger pie is still a bigger slice in absolute terms.

I agree F&M absolutely. It’s easy to forget just how quickly the landscape can shift, both politically and economically, when the basics start biting. Ireland’s protests are a reminder that once everyday essentials become pressure points, governments lose room to hide behind narratives. People feel it directly.

That’s why the Moroccan angle is so compelling. Several posters have highlighted before how central CNG is to daily life there — not a luxury, but a backbone commodity. If Morocco can secure reliable, scalable and cheap domestic supply, it’s not just an energy story; it’s social stability, industrial competitiveness and geopolitical leverage rolled into one.

Predator being positioned at the heart of that transition is exactly the sort of opportunity long‑term holders look for. You’re not just talking about a field or a well; you’re talking about underpinning a national metric that carries real cultural weight, the same way fuel prices or bread did in other societies.

If PRD helps Morocco get ahead of the stress curve while Europe and parts of Africa tighten, that’s a powerful place to be. Nice to be on the right side of that curve.

I’m very comfortable holding shares in Predator — and here’s why.

If the company genuinely had nothing of value, you wouldn’t see the same three posters spending such extraordinary amounts of time here — day after day, week after week, month after month — trying to discredit it.

This goes far beyond criticism of the company or its CEO. The same accounts repeatedly attempt to undermine the fundamentals of the projects themselves, while also targeting posters who bring technical knowledge or balanced analysis to the discussion.

For anyone new to the forum, take five minutes and review the posting history of these accounts:

• Titanasaurus

• Porters1

• Anti_Venom

The pattern is consistent — and it speaks for itself.

I’ve said it time after time.

Some posters show a clear, deliberate pattern: an unbroken stream of negativity aimed at the CEO, the assets, the strategy, and even other posters, often wrapped in cynical or spiteful personal attacks. A few are obvious, but others hide behind a veneer of “realism” while consistently undermining sentiment.

Which raises the obvious question: why would anyone who genuinely believes a company is doomed keep holding shares?

Rational investors sell and move on. They don’t linger for months recycling the same tired talking points. That behaviour doesn’t resemble a shareholder seeking clarity — it resembles someone intent on eroding confidence.

There’s an agenda here. Someone doesn’t want Predator to succeed...

Titanasaurus

Porters1

Anti_venom

Another day of scaremongering as per last week, and yet once again if I try a dummy sell of 250k, 500k and even 1M shares I get an instant offer for them.

Somebody desperately wants them…

...just as it happened last Thursday after Paul’s interview. What followed then looked very much like a coordinated hit on the share price: the vermin descended, aggressive selling, clear attempts to lean on the bid, spooking weaker holders, tripping stop‑losses, and hoovering up cheap volume on the way down. It lasted for the day and then evaporated just as quickly, which tells its own story…

This is the most‑read share discussion forum in the UK. People assume it’s just PIs browsing, but that’s absolutely not the case. Yesterday was a textbook example of games being played to push the price down — spooking holders, triggering stop losses, and creating cheap volume. The swarm of FUD that descended made that pretty clear. I ran multiple dummy sells throughout the day and every single one was met with an instant quote.

Someone wants these shares. You only have to look at the resident trolls who spend every waking hour trying to smother any hint of positivity or good news. Nobody invests that much time unless there’s a motive...

Buys and sells today are balanced as can be seen, if you want to sell there are eager buyers waiting.

I just tried a dummy 1 million sell and got an immediate offer.

Porters1 I asked you this recently but you seem reluctant to answer...why are you invested in Predator?

I posted this previously, but it feels relevant to share again today.

I would just like to give a genuine thank you to the forum posters who have relentlessly sown doubt, deception, and uncertainty — you know who you are — and thank you.

Your persistent vitriolic derision and cynicism forced me to stop reacting and start researching. I read RNS releases with more focus — in some cases several times over — read extensive technical reports, sat through presentations, rechecked the facts and numbers, and spoke to people I otherwise wouldn’t have, who shared incredible expertise in exploration and geology.

What began as a modest stake has grown over the last couple of years into far, far more than I ever anticipated.

I say this with genuine appreciation: your efforts to cast doubt, deception, and uncertainty made me look harder, think longer, and ultimately believe in Predator’s potential more than I ever expected.

To the genuine long term holders on here, I wish you all the very best of luck. Here’s to patience, conviction, and good fortune for those who value the truth.

To the rest: those who chose deception will answer to the facts in time.

Https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/titanasaurus/

Hmm...🤔 🚩

...why are you invested in Predator?

Why would someone who claims to hold shares in a company devote so much relentless time and effort to posting the same bitter, twisted narrative — attacking the company, its CEO Paul Griffiths, and deriding anyone who doesn’t obediently align with their view?

You’ll never get a direct answer. Ask a straightforward question and the response is entirely predictable: deflection, avoidance, and a flurry of personal attacks. Why respond that way?

Because this isn’t about facts.

It isn’t about investment.

And it certainly isn’t about genuine concern.

It’s about an agenda.

Titanasaurus

Anti_venom

Porters1

Why is it that some posters’ entire posting history is overwhelmingly negative — not balanced critique, but a continuous stream of dismissive commentary about the CEO, the assets, the strategy, and even personal attacks on other contributors?

Titanasaurus...🚩

Why is it that some posters’ entire posting history is overwhelmingly negative — not balanced critique, but a continuous stream of dismissive commentary about the CEO, the assets, the strategy, and even personal attacks on other contributors?

Most people here can see the pattern. The obvious names are already well known:

Titanasaurus

Porters1

Anti_Venom

But there are others who operate more subtly — consistently negative, consistently dismissive, and consistently undermining sentiment while claiming to be “just being realistic.” The tone may be smoother, but the pattern is the same.

Which raises a simple question:

Why would anyone who genuinely believes a company is fundamentally flawed continue to hold shares?

Rational investors who lose confidence usually sell and move on. They don’t spend months repeating the same pessimistic talking points, attacking every positive development, or positioning themselves as the permanent voice of doom. That behaviour doesn’t resemble a shareholder seeking clarity.

It resembles someone committed to undermining confidence.

Constructive criticism is always welcome. Persistent negativity without action is not.

So if someone truly believes Predator is destined to fail, the logical step would be to exit the position rather than remain here posting the same dismissive narrative day after day. Anything else speaks for itself…

Titanasaurus

Anti_venom

Porters1

If you're ever unsure about a person, check their posting history...hmm 🤔 🚩

Some more interesting buys going through this morning...could be the start of another worked buy today…

It's a worked buy:

Most trades were off-book (“O”) prints, with a clear buy skew throughout the day. We saw repeated large clips — 200k, 468k, 150k, 100k, 95k, 250k — steadily absorbed from the morning into the afternoon. Sells were relatively small and sporadic.

Price action supports this: the stock firmed from around 3.15 in the morning to roughly 3.29 mid-afternoon, consistent with controlled buying rather than aggressive chasing.

The 2.6m print at 16:36 (flagged “Unknown”) looks like a delayed aggregated report — likely the broker publishing the total of a day-long worked order. It’s almost certainly not a fresh after-hours buy.

The 16:35 UT trade is just the closing auction uncross and unrelated.

Overall: steady institutional accumulation during the session, followed by a late reported total.

Classic worked buy structure.