Member Info for MrGMan

Why would someone who supposedly has shares in the company post hundreds of times a month, always negatively, attacking the company, CEO and individuals alike? - The answer is simple—they have an agenda.

You'll never get a straight answer from them about why they behave this way. Instead, they'll dodge the questions, throw insults, and deflect—why might that be...hmmm 🤔

Anti_venom - https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/Anti_venom/

Hmm...🤔

🤔 hmm..

Titanasaurus

- High volume, confrontational tone.

- Constantly undermines production numbers, timelines, and management.

- Uses personal attacks, sarcasm, and derision rather than analysis.

- Frames every development as negative, even when neutral or mildly positive.

- Behaviour is consistent with someone trying to erode sentiment, not someone invested for upside.

Porters1

- Presents as “concerned shareholder”, but the pattern is repetitive:

- Doubt timelines

- Doubt flow tests

- Doubt management

- Doubt RNS accuracy

- Rarely (if ever) acknowledges positive developments.

- Tone is less aggressive than Titanasaurus, but still persistently negative.

Anti_venom

- The most openly hostile of the three.

- Heavy use of insults, mockery, and derision.

- Repeated claims that the company is untrustworthy, doomed, or run by “shysters”.

- Predicts share price collapse in nearly every post.

- This is classic sentiment‑attack posting, not investor behaviour.

Titanasaurus: https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/titanasaurus/

Porters1: https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/porters1/

Anti_venom: https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/Anti_venom/

If you're ever unsure about a person, check their posting history.

Why would someone who supposedly has shares in the company always post negatively, attacking the company, CEO and individuals alike?

🤔 hmm...

Hi donlab,

The green hydrogen project at Corrib is interesting, but it isn’t really connected to Predator’s situation. That initiative involves the existing Corrib partners and Gas Networks Ireland, whereas Predator’s issue is specifically with the Irish Government’s refusal to grant the Corrib South exploration licence.

Predator is pursuing an Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) arbitration because of that licensing decision, not because of wider hydrogen or renewable projects happening at Corrib. So while the hydrogen pilot is notable in the context of Ireland’s energy transition, it doesn’t have any bearing on Predator’s legal challenge at this stage.

These people are worthless, inconsequential and add nothing whatsoever.

They are not pond life, they are what pond life excrete.

Filter and forget them.

...individuals.

If you're ever unsure about a person, check their posting history.

Why would someone who supposedly has shares in the company post hundreds of times a month, always negatively, attacking the company, CEO and individuals alike? - The answer is simple—they have an agenda.

You'll never get a straight answer from them about why they behave this way. Instead, they'll dodge the questions, throw insults, and deflect.

These people are worthless, inconsequential and add nothing whatsoever.

Filter and forget them.

Titanasaurus

Porters1

Anti_venom

- these individuals (or individual) have zero interest in genuine discussion on this board. Their only objective is to drag the share price down and keep it there. Their behaviour is toxic, and engaging with them is a complete waste of time — it only leads to distortion, bad‑faith arguments, and manufactured drama.

Treat them exactly as their behaviour warrants — social pariahs whose conduct has no place in genuine discussion.

Either filter and forget or report.

Titanasaurus: https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/titanasaurus/

Porters1: https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/porters1/

Anti_venom: https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/Anti_venom/

If you're ever unsure about a person, check their posting history.

Why would someone who supposedly has shares in the company post hundreds of times a month, always negatively, attacking the company, CEO and individuals alike? - The answer is simple—they have an agenda.

You'll never get a straight answer from them about why they behave this way. Instead, they'll dodge the questions, throw insults, and deflect—why might that be?

• Short Selling or Hedging – They could be betting against the stock, hoping negative sentiment will drive the price down.

• Emotional Investing – Some investors let emotions drive their decisions. If they feel betrayed by the company, they may be airing their grievances out of disappointment.

• Competitive Bias – They hold stock in another company and genuinely believe their company is superior and see the competitor as a threat.

• Personal or Professional Ties – They have direct involvement with another company, leading to bias against the competitor.

Does your 300000 trade show on the official LSE page:

https://www.londonstockexchange.com/stock/PRD/predator-oil-gas-holdings-plc/company-page

1 Exploration→

2 Commercial Discovery→

3 Exploitation Concession→

4 Production→

5 💰💰💰

Thanks Rob for laying out what we’ve got in the pipeline — pun absolutely intended!

Hi Sygmaa – I’ve completely undone what I said in my last post.

“Personally I can’t watch them again… every time I do I end up buying more shares!”

Well… I added two more batches of shares this week 😄

Hard not to really. When you look at what Paul Griffiths is putting together across Trinidad and Morocco, it feels like we’re right on the edge of something genuinely exciting.

The momentum, the strategy, the execution… it’s all pointing one way.

Huge potential ahead.

Thanks sygmaa for letting us know about the poster over on the CHAR board this evening singing the praises of Paul Griffiths in one of last years Corporate Presentations – very much appreciated.

Personally I can’t watch them again…every time I do I end up buying more shares! 😄

Day trading depends very much on constant luck. When you skim dozens of companies, you miss the nuances that drive long-term value.

If you invest the time to research a single company thoroughly like Predator – its fundamentals, balance sheet, competitive position, and the mindset of its leadership, you can size your position accordingly and capture those hopefully outsized returns. Basically do your homework thoroughly, then double down.

Focus and depth, not breadth and speed, are the better path to meaningful returns.

Day trading attracts people with the promise of quick profits, but the reality is the majority of day traders lose money. For most people, day trading isn’t a meaningful or reliable way to earn an income.

Here’s an old saying with rather sinister origins, but it captures the difference between frenzied day trading across many companies, as opposed to concentrating your capital in a very small number of names, perhaps even just one.

“…we only have to be lucky once — you have to be lucky always….”

@ OLADAPO007 - It was mentioned by KeithOz in a post on 24 Dec that Italfluid (world leaders in flow assurance and early production systems) are very likely involved to resolve any flow issues:

“We further know that Italfluid, world leaders in flow assurance and early production systems, were involved in flow testing MOU-3, and appear to be designing MOU-6…It is safe to assume that Italfluid will be involved with PRD and their marketing and distribution partners, and that CNG will be sold before LNG.

All these companies have vast expertise available for due diligence, and would not be spending considerable time and money unless they were very sure that substantial quantities of gas were able to be produced.”

Anti_venom – “Stating concerns about age concerns in the age of a current CEO should be on the radar of each and every investor. It is a valid point when making a financial decision.”

Wrong on all counts, calling a CEO geriatric amongst other things breaches:

• Equality Act 2010 – Age discrimination

• UK Defamation Act 2013

• Market Abuse Regulation – MAR

• Online Safety Act 2023

• LSE forum Terms of Service

In the UK at the moment what you say online is very much in focus – in the last few years people have been heavily fined and in some cases jailed for what they posted online.

A sea of red? - what a massive over exaggeration - that’s not a sea of red, that’s a puddle after light rain.

I first wrote this in November but it’s still relevant for any newcomers to Predator:

If you're ever unsure about a person, check their posting history.

Why would someone who supposedly has shares in the company post hundreds of times a month, always negatively, attacking the company, CEO and individuals alike? - The answer is simple—they have an agenda.

You'll never get a straight answer from them about why they behave this way. Instead, they'll dodge the questions, throw insults, and deflect—why might that be?

• Short Selling or Hedging – They could be betting against the stock, hoping negative sentiment will drive the price down.

• Emotional Investing – Some investors let emotions drive their decisions. If they feel betrayed by the company, they may be airing their grievances out of disappointment.

• Competitive Bias – They hold stock in another company and genuinely believe their company is superior and see the competitor as a threat.

• Personal or Professional Ties – They have direct involvement with another company, leading to bias against the competitor.

I believe in Predator, which is why I invested. Being told day after day by these people that I'm a fool for doing so is deeply insulting. No doubt they'll respond to this with something derogatory—but one thing you’ll never get from them is an honest answer about why they post as they do.

..."I fully expect the usual stream of sarcastic, mocking and vacuous comments from certain individuals, complete with the same childish emojis that say more about them than anything they write."