Member Info for MR.Spacetomato

A little consolidation at the moment, which healthy for our share movement to continue its upwards trend.

Preflight checks at the moment. It is looking good.

Dumbpunter,

Thank you for the summary, really useful to have all the points written down for other newbies here. The podcast went really well and I feel really good about the business and the CEO.

FlagStaffIR,

Thank you for posting the link, made my job easier. Cheers.

I hope to more than double my current holding in the coming weeks as I am just waiting on some extra cash to come in. Thanks lads.

ATB

I can't believe it, but do you realise that finally, we are almost there, many posts later, so many discussions and research (and that is just us), so many other LFTs, the days of ODX vs AVACTA (my one is bigger than yours), is it us?
It is now just over a year when it all began, and so much has gone under the bridge, so much money is at stake on the verge of our big day, Sir Al's big day, AVACTA's big day! And I spared a thought, that all of this and much, much more started because of some bat soup!

Wilson

Sisu, there some interesting paragraphs below the ones you found..
"Currently the USA is the world’s leading exporter of tests and China is quickly increasing its production particularly of lateral flow test. This creates a strong global supply in tests. However, the rapid expanse has naturally brought with it bottlenecks, for example demand for raw materials. Regulation can potentially help lead to a more productive sector. By forcing companies to focus on developing high quality tests in order to enter the market, we can expect this to mean raw material and other resources are more efficiently allocated further down the supply chain towards those companies producing higher quality tests. The government is keen to develop a resilient UK based supply chain to safeguard test supply particularly as we strive for improved quality. As imports continue, it will be important that these regulations apply equally and fairly to overseas manufacturers and wholesalers as they do to UK manufacturers and retailers.

The UK government has a number of objectives in relation to facilitating a thriving private sector market for COVID-19 detection testing. One key objective is about enabling and supporting innovation. We are keen to grow the private testing market, enabling domestic innovation to improve testing effectiveness and efficiency. The faster and more accurate tests become the easier it is to prevent the spread of infection and allow businesses, events and other organisations to operate as normal. The UK government is keen to leverage the UK’s world-renowned capabilities in medical technologies to become a world leader in the development and manufacture of COVID-19 tests. We know many companies in the UK are focusing on developing faster and more innovative testing solution as we have already seen with the development of LAMP and LamPORE assays.

As we need tests to meet a sufficient quality in order to be effective, a validation measure will only limit poor quality tests entering the market as high quality ones will already be meeting the required threshold. We do not believe that the proposed fees and timescales involved in validation would act as a deterrent to market entry for new manufacturers or cause any existing test manufacturer to leave the UK market, particularly as they would not need to compete against poor quality tests that could have lower development and production costs.

For a market to function efficiently it requires all parties to have access to information to make rational decisions. This will make the UK private testing market more competitive, as manufacturers will need to improve the accuracy and speed of their tests in order to outcompete competitors, which should continually drive innovation as well as acting as a downward pressure on prices. We do not believe validation will significantly reduce the supply of high quality COVID-19 tests on the UK market. As such, the benefits from improvement in ..test quality.

Urbansea89: "I''d want them to be holding off any bids and the board saying: let's bank this money first, see-through AVA6000"

And you know what Urbansea89, if a big pharma takes us over they would probably place all the AVCT cancer therapies back into the stone age telling the world it needs further research and keep it under wraps for the next 30 years so they can benefit from their expensive Chemo treatments in the meantime; call it conspiracy theory if they want.

No access for me either.

Sorry, ment to copy and paste "OracleofSkegness" and not my own ID.

MR.Spacetomato,

Thanks. Funny, that was one of the 1st things I did before I bought it. I looked at transport for lorries and freight train lines, water and power lines; also if they were too close to towns or forests. The place is as perfect as one could wish for and has all the above in term of logistics - in short - it is a perfect mine in my books (neighbour China and on the Silk-Iron-railroad).

Honestly, sorry but can KAV wait two weeks before it starts moving? I need some extra cash that I will have in two weeks max!!
/:0(

LiveLongnProsper,

Lucky was the deer!

PSB123 ,

I totally agree with you on both pharmas. I have a friend who has 4D as one of his major holdings and I remember telling him to wait a little as TILS hopes were not materialised on the Nasdaq launch and that maybe 4D would see the similar trend; bless him, could have got more 4D at 20% discount (the old adagio - buy on news..bla bla bla). I wish you all the best with them PSB123..it will happen. With pharmas we need lots a patience and a long term view.

Anyway, both TILS and 4D are great companies and one has only to have patience. It is like AVACTA for many here; are we happy with the AFFIMERS? YES! So we let them do the magic and see what RNS Sir Al will pull out of the his hat.

Happy days

ST

Good day all,

Compare 4D and TILS? What did Nasdaq do to them as well? The rose since announcing they were going to list..then..dropping ever since Poor guys.

Serendipidity

My two pence is MMs raising to 45p to entice sells(day traders for instance) then drop the sp to entice sellers by frustrating some as they see profits eroding. This game will be played all the way as long as they have orders to fill and reluctant sellers like, moi!, to deal with I am sitting tight for the next few years. LTH. IMHO.

As some have suggested here, an RNS saying Sir Davis are now at the table will help give us a lift, check the chart for NextSource materials, it didn't do anything; by all means it would be nice a lift above 50p, but I wouldn't hold my breadth or be disappointed. Our current price is because he is onboard. I don't care as I don't mind these penny movements as I look at the long term result. And if it drops to 35 or lower, I buy more. I actually look forward to a drop as I am in accumulate mode.

GLE

ST

FlagStaffIR,

Thank you for the analyst comments. Thumbs up!

ST

Good morning all,

Just to say that I have joined you guys this morning with an initial punt; more to come in due course. :0)

GLA

ST

Good morning all,

Good to see things are moving in the right direction and MMs are having a hard time shaking these "bad" apples. ;0)

I haven't posted much as busy at the moment but reading your posts when I can.

Stay safe.

ST

ChrisinStanley,

Thank you for the points ref video.

ST

fulmar29,

To be fair, the lad only wished the share would drop after he was addressed in a bad way. I would have given him the benefit of the doubt before firing at him. It felt like as if we shot first, then ask the questions.

That's all.

T-Bagger, Good morning.

I am knew to RBW, but what I feel happened here was that some LTH may be suspicious of the intentions of some posters when the question seem a little on the sharp edge of the knife; I mean, asking a direct question on how a possible -20% ROE will affect RBW, at the same time informing the board that he didn't research the company. I suppose some felt maybe LSTH was pocking RBW?

I think everyone here expects any interested future shareholder to have done a little bit of research by at least reading the company's website for starters, watched a few video interviews and read a few RNS. For instance, when he asked how bad a 20% reduction in REO would affect RBW, what would I reply? I would say, if he had watched the video from the 25th March that GB said most Chinese mines the TREO is 0.03 to 0.08%, so even if RBW TROE had a drop of 20%, which makes us 0.4% we are still 10 times better than Chinese mines! That's his answer.

But I agree with you, give the lad a little help as he wasn't aggressive or disrespectful at the beginning. I hope he calms down and come back.

ST

Dumbpunter,

Thank you, sir, for the introduction; I look forward to the video today, not to mention the opening of the market.

Good day everyone