Member Info for Morningsun

JC, you may very well be correct. However, the expectations are based on the visual reviews of cores HAD006 to HAD009 and they are very, very good. They were very good for HAD005 too and the proved to be correct based on the assays results hence the market expects similar.
If that is not the case there may be some pain but in the end, we don't need these stellar results for the last cores. We need to prove that there is a lot of gold at decent grams/mt.

Now it's 2.1284 to buy. :-\

GLA
MS

You may be right. What I meant was bottom end of spread. Maybe that clarifies. And indeed, buy now at 2.20.
MS

2.2149. Bottom end of range.
Different start to the day then the last trading days.

GLA
MS

Mungro,

this is from the last RNS. Where does it say the DD is complete?
*****
NOMINATED ADVISER UPDATE

As previously announced, the Company is in the process of appointing a replacement Nominated Adviser and Broker and has been working with that adviser during the last few weeks on the take-on process. A further announcement will be made this week.
******
GLA
MS

I'm with you FHP. I reread the RSN again and the key part of it is the trucks. They were coming AP has said quite a few times. Now they are not...
I've had it with him. Never was CEO material, never will be.
I'm done.
GLA
MS

USD 1 million! Now we know where that went ;-)
GLA
MS

Not for me IG. If you find things like HAD005 assay results then anything else is drowned out. All eyes on the price springs to mind which was getting the next drills done. When HAD006 to HAD009 are put to bed soon then the view will open up again I expect.
GLA
MS.

So, did we have the same quality of assay results last year SPY? Or any at all for that matter? Not so.
In short, think what you want but HAD001 and HAD005 assay results are stellar and the visual reviews of HAD006 to HAD009 are nothing less. That makes this very, very different form last year.

The only question is how big is this? Not whether there is 'quite a bit' of high grade gold. Whether there is enough gold to mined economically will have to be proven, but from what I read it could very well be so.
GLA
MS

as this is for everyone, it seems that me that a lot of this news was already priced in. We went from over 60 to 16 in 3 months. That had to do with quite a few if not all of the issues that have now been spelled out.

I therefore don't see any value in selling up now. I should have when Bergen hit and am still kicking myself that I did not actually press sell, but that is water under the bridge.

Although there will be swings and roundabouts for the coming weeks/months, I am holding as one way or another, there is value to be made of this company.

However, as I have said many times, we now need to get rid of AP. He has now proven substantially what I have been saying for months: he is not a CEO, for many reasons.
The primary reason why he has to go NOW is that he has lost all trust from shareholders as one can clearly reason this BB. You cannot be called the things he is being cLledon here and stay on pretending that everything is business as usual. That mistrust in itself is unsustainable and going forward he is now the key issue holding this company back.

What is the next step?

GLA
MS

Hexy,

the RNS is not 'so good'. More importantly, it is not bad! It's actually for a start-up a fine RNS. The company is improving their turnover and in the early stages profitability is always an issue. They key is the uptake of the products. That takes time and in some cases (like the UN) it takes a lot of time as decisions are complex and the organisations bureaucratic.

Moreover, the market is expecting the news about the Nomad assignment and hence a reasonable RNS about trading is treated negatively because it did not include the Nomad assignment.

What people are forgetting is that the reason we have a Nomad issue is not because of STAR but because of our previous Nomad. In short, there is no reason to doubt whether we will get one (and no one on here can point me out a reason for not getting one so far) because essentially there was no STAR related business reason for our previous Nomad to give us up.

If you see what 2 bit companies get Nomads then I cannot see any reason why we would not get one. It just takes time, a bit like the UN deal.

Be patient, DYOR and it will come good.

GLA
MS

Tiburn,
Thanks.
They are indeed very laid back.
Have just reviewed the link that PG posted earlier on Artemis and scallywag and that also looks good.
MS

Anyway, that's my last response to you. Not worth the time as you're clearly not interested.

Let's focus on how we can build this SP back up again.
GLA
MS

Well, I'm clearly not as thick as you are and definitely not as devisive. Suddenly it's all about BP resource instead of how you started with AP's share of BP. Sure.

At least good for you that you believe your own story.

See,I did say there would the the typical response from you and it did arrive. 'Give me the answer I want and then I will stop.' What a load of bullying b@ll@cks.
MS

Tiburn, if not excited about GGP, what do Australian experienced mining expert posters get excited about on hotcopper?
MS

HAT, could you post a ink to that EM survey pls. Can't find it on their website.
Thanks
MS

Sandy, the teapot must be changing tactics as it became very clear that the AP share % has no bearing on the company at all. In fact, as many point out, it actually is the opposite, it aligns. Especially on BP. Hence I said take it up with AP, but that the teapot doesn't do, noooo it just keeps on venting here. Therefore I conclude that there seems to be zero intent on the teapot's side to actually achieve clarity.

As I shave said earlier, the teapot and it's imaginary brother must have a personal issue with AP/VAST. Otherwise one wouldn't be this dogmatic and slippery, moving and turning to gain attention.

As it's proclaimed itself, the teapot's reason for repetition of it's murky views is to make sure that every potential investor that views this board is scared off by it's incessant deramping.

Not happening as quite a few of good posts are putting the teapot back in the closet where it belongs.

Of course the response is going to be that we are all just ignorant because we don't agree with the teapot's spin. Sure, it just pushes it's own agenda. Whatever.
All in favour of a good discussion, but this is different. Especially from someone who is NOT invested. Imaginary brother, lmao.

What oh what is the teapot's agenda???

GLA
MS

Well, it all depends on price doesn't it. If someone offers the required price that makes both parties happy then why not. It really all depends, but proving up resource usually creates higher value. Simples.
GLA
MS

Dim, I did a bit of digging (pun intended) on internet and what I can find is that the deepest open pit mine in the world is the Bingham Canyon mine near salt lake city and is 1.2km deep.
Not saying your contact at the AGM is not correct but 3km deep is really massive for an open pit and I can't find it.
GLA
MS

Not really if you're about 100% out. That's not semantics anymore. That's just incorrect and painting the wrong picture.

GGP have 3.226 bln shares in issue and SOLG 1.846 bln. How is that a third??
MS