Member Info for Moneyman64

Thanks Mike-based on the recent shareprice movements Tharisa is being treated as a sole PGM producer and specifically a platinium producer -the recent rise in the chrome price appears to be being overlooked

Thanks Iky -when is our leader going to stop putting his ego and greed? before shareholders who only own the company?

Any reasonable deal out there should be put to the shareholders-most people are intelligent enough to decide if a deal is good or bad.

Expecting nothing-service (no service) as normal.

What is the point of a CEO who continually misses deadlines and makes “promises “ that never come to fruition.

No use to shareholders who are just funding CEOS life style

Some here seem don’t care if Colin does not deliver any shareholder returns for the next few years and seem to not care about mist deadlines

Perhaps they should ask themselves that despite the company being in the “right place at the right time” the shareprice can not even hold at 1p.?

If Colin does not deliver soon there will be another discounted placing and longterm shareholders will continue to be diluted as the CEO continues to waffle on about the price of copper.

No asset sale,no production,continued drilling = more dilution.

Well said Cyberiachas-totally agree about your comments on Bird -GLR need a fulltime CEO and need to actually get a deal over the line for once

Always Groundhog Day here and timelines consistently missed

JDAU-read the RNs dated 17 Sept

Just hope it’s not more hot air from Bird

Thanks Iky-not suprised that Bird is apparently once again treating shareholders with contempt.

99% convinced that Bird will miss the 16th Feb deadline-

Let’s hope so and there are no disappointments

Can’t even hold 1p despite Copper ever increasing in price !

Why the sudden massive drop?

The whole point Chrisp is when we get a sale of an asset for tens of millions (as you confidently predicted) any sensible shareholder would not want the warrants in existence as the current shareholders will be significantly diluted for the sake of £3.5 million .

It is illogical to celebrate the warrants that significantly dilutes your share of the proceeds of any sale and the existence of the warrants will severely restricted the upside of the share price above 1.6p as the warrant holders sell for their 10-20% turn.

Unfortunately shows Bird cares little about long term shareholders interests

Of course there is a very good deal to be done on Luansobe.

It’s a great same we don’t have a CEO who can dedicate all his time to GLR to get the most of the assets.

A very part time CEO is not ideal

Disagree Klapka-a regular dividend would be a huge boast for the company’s longterm shareholders and reflect real progress.

A one for ten share consolidation might be worth considering once the profits start rolling in or if the Waste project is sold for a significant sum

Agree 3cardbrag -Bird’s track record of providing returns to longterm shareholders is diabolical -huge shareholder losses across the vast majority of the companies he is involved on.

Agree -the GLR assets are strong but they need someone’s full attention to monetize them.

Already have loads of Jubilee shares.

Nearly bought MBO yesterday -Ah well

Foolish me purchased another 500,000 shares yesterday .

On the law of averages with GLR Asset range Bird would be totally incompetent if he is unable to deliver a return on one of the company assets over the next few months.

Time for Bird to show he is not totally incompetent and actually comply with the previous RNS re disposal of an asset

How can increasing PGM production by 9000 ounces and selling at circa $850 higher per ounce compared to the corresponding period last year be not good -also better recovery rates so costs may be less.

Cash burn explained by further investment in Karo and underground project.

PGM production up 9000 ounzes compared to corresponding period last year with much higher PGM prices-does not appear that bad to me .

100% agree BSmoniter-further dilution to dig more holes is likely to cost shareholders a lot more than selling one asset.

A dilution of interest in all assets would be far more costly for shareholders than selling one asset at a marginal less than “optimum price “ -the effect is a small “dilution” in one asset and not dilution in all assets.

Hope Bird understands this more than some of the posters here

Luansobe should have been generating income long ago -too much faffing from Bird and not enough action.