Member Info for Moab

Tatty

I am afraid I do remember Pyromex. How about this one from almost 10Y ago: how time flies!

15 October 2013

PowerHouse Energy Group plc (the "Company" or "PowerHouse")

Testing and commissioning program continues

• Longer-term testing showing excellent results

• High quality synthesis gas produced from multiple feed-stocks

• Customer enquiries rising

PowerHouse announces that the testing program begun by its wholly owned subsidiary Pyromex AG ("Pyromex") continues successfully and that the level of customer enquiries to view the operation of the 5 tonne per day unit at Schwartzenbach, Switzerland has risen significantly since testing commenced.

The initial phases of testing, including repeated thermal cycling, long-duration 'dry' operation and the continuous feed of multiple feed-stocks has shown considerable promise for the commercial delivery of the platform on schedule.

As part of the testing programme, Pyromex will be seeking to obtain full EU Compliance Certification for the smaller 5 tonne per day unit which it expects to achieve within the next 30 days.

The testing program and customer demonstrations will continue for the near future with commercial delivery expected in early 2014.

Strophe

True, but with resect ,what point are you making? PHE received all that you describe via a 48% share of the business. How much of the Engsolve profit was from non-PHE work?

Patx

Me neither. "This is the start of a new era for PHE" says Ryan. Just focus on the core purpose of PHE and build a bl00dy DMG. it should have been up and running ages ago.

Dr A.

No, not really! Were my post to have been offensive I might have accepted the irony, but in making 2 points; a) LSE is badly moderated - if at all, about which we seem to be in agreement and b) that the aforementioned poster has a long record of pointlessly virulent attacks in response to uncontentious posts. I see no irony here!. But I am in no way offended by what you write, and am grateful for yr response.

I am absolutely happy to have civil discourse with anyone here.

Dr A

You are right about a complete absence of moderation on this board. It seems that item 4 of the rules on posting in particular carries no weight with LSE. Your Telegram colleague, known here as Swazer, is incontestably the rudest and quite deliberately offensive person ever encountered on this board. His various assertions that are completely without validity or any factual basis are an added pain.

Were he to stick to Telegram this board would be a far happier place; you would be welcome to him on Telegram.

Sampo

Thanks for the info.

moab

Is it known how much cash PHE have left, and by implication when they might try another cash raise?

Moneysponge

I suppose that is the most likely explanation for ~16% drop in last 2 days. Last chance saloon for PHE.

Sales into any markets would make me happy. We may be close, but who knows?

And Sunbelt is a trading name for Ashtead, who, although a British co., do most of their equipment hiring in the US

Visiting host

Ignore him, we have all had to put up with his rants. He has been absent for 2-3 weeks and the board a happier place.

Emerald

OK, I withdraw the words 'is likely' Parsortix is not a screening test. And as for "probably illegal to post"; what nonsense.

PS, have been a LTH > 5 years, but am losing faith.

Emerald. The capture rate for intact cancer cells in early malignancy is likely to be exceedingly small, and as a screening test Parsortix is, sadly, of no value. The Grail process, using fragments, seems to be improving in the early detection of suspected, or even unsuspected malignancy. I wonder whether AI might make this process even more accurate. But it will never supplant Parsortix as a means of careful analysis of all aspects of the cancer cell which is going to be of value in determining the correct therapeutic approach.

PS analysis? (analisis might mean something else......)

Can someone explain how the AFC ammonia cracker works, or point me to a useful source please?

A query: how is it possible to delete a post, either ones own or someone written by someone else? Any experts out there?

Southernhay
"It’s a shame that LSE doesn’t police its own boards and administer strict actions when rules are violated." Complete agreement, for what it is worth. I tried after a grossly personally offensive post on PHE to get a well known chartist excluded, one Sw**er, with no effect whatseover. It seemed a waste of time.

all
Yes, untaxed, and if kept long enough will avoid IHT as well - all IMHO

A strange thing has happened. Posts on PHE stopped appearing on Thursday of last week. Posts on all other stocks all up to date. I just want to ask if anyone has ideas how this can happen.

It is unlikely to be a large contract as we are only dealing with a single prostate study.

So another downstream assay to compliment Parsortix. This is the way forwards towards revenue