RE: What next for the SP ?28 Nov 2024 15:23
In summary Mike's statement on Heron 2 :
"Heron 2 was drilled just under a kilometer away from Heron 1, and the intention was to encounter the same reservoir and replicate the production performance we’ve seen at Heron 1. Based on the drilling and logging responses, everything initially looked promising and similar to what we observed at Heron 1. That gave us reason to believe we’d see comparable results during testing.
However, during the testing phase, the flow rate from Heron 2 was extremely low. The reservoir is behaving like a tight, low-permeability system, which is quite different from what we’ve seen at Heron 1. This inconsistency has been surprising. While we did manage to recover some oil from the well—about 30 barrels per day—the rate is marginally commercial, particularly in winter when additional heating is required to keep the oil warm.
That said, we’re not writing off Heron 2. We’ve collected pressure data and other key information during testing, and we’re now analyzing it to determine if the testing process itself may have caused the poor performance. There’s a possibility that operational factors, like incomplete perforation or damage during the testing phase, are contributing to the lower flow rate.
We’re considering several options to address this, such as reperforation, recompletion, or a clean-out operation. Alternatively, we may wait until warmer weather to reassess the well’s performance. The key question we’re trying to answer is whether this is a true reflection of the reservoir or simply a result of something that went wrong during testing.
At this point, it’s too early to make a definitive conclusion, but we’re committed to resolving the issue(!!!). We believe Heron 2 still has potential, and we’ll continue working on it over the coming months to unlock that potential."