Member Info for MitchConnor

Lower explosive limits of common gasses

- n-Butane: 1.8% vol
- Iso-Butane: 1.8% vol.
- Ethane: 3% vol.
- Ethylene: 2.7% vol.
- Hexane: 1.2% vol.
- Hydrogen: 4% vol
- Methane: 5% vol.
- Pentane: 1.5% vol.
- Propane: 2.2% vol.

Methane is piped into nearly everyone’s home,
Butane is freely available for use in outdoor barbecues, indoor portable heaters and patio heaters.

Propane, is used in off grid locations either in bottled form for smaller properties including caravans and bulk storage for larger properties or developments.

So questions to AFC. Please cut and paste as you add to give a collated post please.

1. What is the timescale for completing longevity testing of electrodes for the HydroX-Cell(L)TM and obtaining a warranty?

2. How long is it likely to be before the HydroX-Cell(S)TM can be used in commercial ev chargers? Will the AlkaMem membrane be commercially available in the same timescale? Which metrics remain to be confirmed for this membrane?

3. What patents are still OS and what are the likely timescales for finalisation.

4. What is Rolec’s role in this partnership, what percentage if any of the overall finished product do they have rights to or are they in effect just a customer/distributor for the AFC EV charger? How will AFC slot into their On demand Nation wide charging grid/platform?

No, it’s the H bomb. My point is that’s he/she is making over the top comparisons.

Literally no one:

BMAC: https://youtu.be/Tl3_0D2h8BY

Heath, he/she admitted/claimed that he/she didn’t have the heart to sell them in the end. So what angle the flip flopping between ramp/de ramp is coming from is anyone’s guess.

It does show that there is an appetite for cleaner and quieter alternatives to diesel generators but at 187W it’s only really powerful enough to power a couple of lights.

BMAC, both full of hydrogen? Yes I get that point but completely different scenarios. It’s like comparing the risks associated with carrying a petrol can and the risk of fire after an accident in a top fuel drag race. Last time I checked AFC wasn’t planning on strapping paying customers to the EV charger and launching it into orbit. All the containers will be ventilated at high level, hydrogen is less dense than air, in the event of a leak it would vent to atmosphere, has a similar explosive lower limit to methane, hydrogen 4% methane 5% in air. I’m guessing that 90% of domestic properties in the UK have a Nat Gas connection, plus the network that runs under nearly every street in this country.

BMAC, what does a space shuttle launch have to do with a static fuel cell??

MPO818, they’d probably want to nationalise us.

Mucksy that guy was ranting like a loon, if anything blatantly trying to manipulate people into selling.

Banaman , the SP had already dropped at the time of posting, LSE isn’t live.

Does anyone remember the ramp list link? Would be interesting to see again.

23.9 now showing on my Equiniti account

22p showing on Equiniti

Cheekboy, it’s less than three weeks until the Shareholder Day which will effectively be the first demonstration of the working unit. I’m sure there will be other news to report in the interim but even if there isn’t, there’s a decent amount of momentum in this share now, there’s always going to be people getting in late on the back of the recent rise, the share price has almost quadrupled in just over a week, probably appearing on people’s watch lists, I think we’ll be going over 20pps Monday or Tuesday with or without news.

I know, but it does show that at least originally the battery was in the same container as the fuel cell and the invertor. I agree this could all be different now, not looking to die on this hill.

klunk

https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/car-news/consumer-news/105710/uk-s-afc-energy-launches-ch2arge-world-s-first-hydrogen-fuel-cell

This looks like the rear containerised section of the EV charger to me.

Sorry heath, I assumed you were on about the EV charging platform available in December rather than the larger systems with the first 160kW system available from June 2020.

The image on the website is of a 40ft container, I would still think it would all be contained in the one housing as the cracker would be installed between the bottle banks/feed stock and the fuel cells, also running gas works externally to the containerised area would carry its own risks and regulations.

Yes, as it will need to vent by-products to atmosphere and also require ventilation for cooling along with the fuel cells.

https://afcenergyprod.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Roadshow-brochure-131119-3-JT1.pdf

Heath, if you look at the illustration of the fuel cell unit you will notice that the front storage compartment is ventilated, I think this will be for storage of bottled ammonia or hydrogen although I can’t see the latter being preferable. I think the cracker would be in the back section to keep it clear of the bottled gas banks, also I would think it preferable to keep electricity in this area to a minimum or even totally excluded.