Stephan Bernstein, CEO of GreenRoc, details the PFS results for the new graphite processing plant. Watch the video here.
No, it’s the H bomb. My point is that’s he/she is making over the top comparisons.
Literally no one:
BMAC: https://youtu.be/Tl3_0D2h8BY
Heath, he/she admitted/claimed that he/she didn’t have the heart to sell them in the end. So what angle the flip flopping between ramp/de ramp is coming from is anyone’s guess.
It does show that there is an appetite for cleaner and quieter alternatives to diesel generators but at 187W it’s only really powerful enough to power a couple of lights.
BMAC, both full of hydrogen? Yes I get that point but completely different scenarios. It’s like comparing the risks associated with carrying a petrol can and the risk of fire after an accident in a top fuel drag race. Last time I checked AFC wasn’t planning on strapping paying customers to the EV charger and launching it into orbit. All the containers will be ventilated at high level, hydrogen is less dense than air, in the event of a leak it would vent to atmosphere, has a similar explosive lower limit to methane, hydrogen 4% methane 5% in air. I’m guessing that 90% of domestic properties in the UK have a Nat Gas connection, plus the network that runs under nearly every street in this country.
BMAC, what does a space shuttle launch have to do with a static fuel cell??
MPO818, they’d probably want to nationalise us.
Mucksy that guy was ranting like a loon, if anything blatantly trying to manipulate people into selling.
Banaman , the SP had already dropped at the time of posting, LSE isn’t live.
Does anyone remember the ramp list link? Would be interesting to see again.
23.9 now showing on my Equiniti account
22p showing on Equiniti
Cheekboy, it’s less than three weeks until the Shareholder Day which will effectively be the first demonstration of the working unit. I’m sure there will be other news to report in the interim but even if there isn’t, there’s a decent amount of momentum in this share now, there’s always going to be people getting in late on the back of the recent rise, the share price has almost quadrupled in just over a week, probably appearing on people’s watch lists, I think we’ll be going over 20pps Monday or Tuesday with or without news.
I know, but it does show that at least originally the battery was in the same container as the fuel cell and the invertor. I agree this could all be different now, not looking to die on this hill.
klunk
https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/car-news/consumer-news/105710/uk-s-afc-energy-launches-ch2arge-world-s-first-hydrogen-fuel-cell
This looks like the rear containerised section of the EV charger to me.
Sorry heath, I assumed you were on about the EV charging platform available in December rather than the larger systems with the first 160kW system available from June 2020.
The image on the website is of a 40ft container, I would still think it would all be contained in the one housing as the cracker would be installed between the bottle banks/feed stock and the fuel cells, also running gas works externally to the containerised area would carry its own risks and regulations.
Yes, as it will need to vent by-products to atmosphere and also require ventilation for cooling along with the fuel cells.
https://afcenergyprod.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Roadshow-brochure-131119-3-JT1.pdf
Heath, if you look at the illustration of the fuel cell unit you will notice that the front storage compartment is ventilated, I think this will be for storage of bottled ammonia or hydrogen although I can’t see the latter being preferable. I think the cracker would be in the back section to keep it clear of the bottled gas banks, also I would think it preferable to keep electricity in this area to a minimum or even totally excluded.
TwoCents, I agree the battery storage on the 400 is a bit underwhelming so maybe by June 2021 that capacity could be increased without an increase in footprint or even a different solution with additional batteries on smaller banks of chargers. After reading the brochure again I do agree that 100 is a bit of a stretch but would work well
In an office set up, charging cars while people are working or even a hotel set up charging cars overnight, a premium fee could be charged for anyone wanted a rapid charge.
Two Cents, they aren’t going to have 100 charge points in use all the time, there will be some latency between charges to allow the battery storage chance to recover, even at peak times it’s unlikely that all 100 points will be drawing at the same time.