The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
How on earth a company is supposed to conduct a strategic review with no permanent CFO or CEO is beyond me- so agree with RK this has Nicks and CGP fingerprints over it.
What will happen I am not sure although my guess is the review is well advanced and the outcome is known.
Sorry posted wrong link use this one - relevant text "Unlike streaming agreements which contemplate the sale and purchase of precious metals, offtake deals are typically used in connection with base metals, which have a more complex and lengthy supply chain involving bulk transport and refining."
https://www.canadianminingjournal.com/featured-article/offtake-agreements-and-financing-mine-projects/#:~:text=Unlike%20streaming%20agreements%20which%20contemplate,involving%20bulk%20transport%20and%20refining.
Fort / SM - sorry to split hairs, but offtake and streaming are considered different. I spoke to IR some time back and they informed that BHP and others also do offtake deals and are not adverse to them. These are generally done after DFS (Such as Bolinden). They are more against royalty deals. Please see a good article...
https://seekingalpha.com/article/2561245-royalties-vs-streams
Q, which is why I said delete as applicable. Thanks for raising your view interested in all other views also. If they tested the market and it was not suitable (for BHP and NC). Why would this be suitable for BHP and NC? It wouldn’t.
Begs the question as to what was the funding package which as “failed/tested the market” (delete as applicable). Must have been different if they have gone ahead now regardless with streaming?
Does anyone know based on this royalty deal what is the implied valuation per share? Is this what DC was getting at at his 78p per share?
Orthen correct - although this looks like it is a bunch of Sanghas mates!
Add - 100% agree. He is certainly it getting my votes at AGM. On a different topic Twiggers reason for not putting directors up for re-election last year was that he did not want to destabilise the board. Ironically the bird is very different now to then anyway…
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6987926918599757824?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios
Nick posted this.
Mr Mather commented,
"DGR Global is strongly supportive and welcomes the normalising of the Cascabel ownership and Board representation in SoGold.
DGR Global looks forward to the restoration of shareholder value as a result of the merger and outcomes pursuant to the strategic review process".
Nice :-)
I am not positive on the board - I still think lack of exploration is a strategic miss.
Communications have been terrible.
The [failed] funding episode.
And quite simply the low share price.
Nick M gets my vote - simply as he is aligned and has skin in the game.
And the presentation on page 3 talks about
"Strategy : Applying the Cascabel blueprint for further discoveries in Ecuador" - yet they have stopped exploring.
100% agree Add
If the failed (not failed for some on here) fundraise did not please NCM and BHP, I dont understand why they could not have done a cash box style raise and added the likes of Wyloo to the shareholder register. After all if we offered and they did not participate then what is the issue?
Have made a strategic investment in GGP. Come on Nick have a word with them for Solgold!
Red, if you suspect that there has been some disagreement between CEO and CFO, I wonder if Nick was behind Darryl's thinking? Seems strange to lose two key finance people in quick succession.
Fortissimo. Maybe they are referring to Helipuerto Project, south east Ecuador: New Tinkimints Copper Prospect
Tinkimints copper prospect and the Helipuerto project concessions is adjacent to Solaris Resources' Warintza deposit within one of the most prolific portions of the Andean Jurassic Porphyry Belt, which hosts the nearby Fruta Del Norte and Mirador mines, the Santa Barbara, Panantza and, and SolGold's newly discovered Cacharposa deposit at Porvenir.
Extensive soil sampling over the last three months has returned high values of copper in soil at Tinkimints, including up to 0.7% Cu in soils. The Tinkimints prospect is characterised by highly anomalous copper and copper/zinc in soil over a 1.5km by 1km area.
Seems strange that this report is about Cascabel and on pg 95 there is section regarding QP verifying logging of drill cores. All seems fine except the drill cores listed are not for TAM. They are for Porvenir.(PDH) Surely this could have been picked up by the company. And there is not reason to. Ross contaminate data in such an independent report.
I asked company and response was this week - because of PH in UK we may see on SEDAR before - due to their timing regulations. I anticipate an RNS on Monday
In the event of a separate IPO where (in genera) does it leave existing shareholders?
Yesterday UP at GB equivalent of 29p. Appreciate that volume is less but hopefully a reversal today.