Member Info for mistermeister

Fastjet - I can dummy sell up to 1.1mill so suggests that they need shares.
ANyone have Level2 access? How is the book looking?

Who are valuestone advisors - to raise $5m at US0.42 (= 32p)?

Just reading back through this RNS about BHP placing at £45m at 45p. One of the conditions was
“ Ø BHP will, for a period of two years, support the recommendations of the SolGold Board in respect of any shareholder approvals required in connection with any change of control transaction involving the Cascabel Project or SolGold, provided it is supported by an Independent Expert appointed by the SolGold Board and 60% of SolGold shareholders (disregarding BHP's shares) accept or approve the transaction”

Reflecting back - this is interesting in that NM has also been quoted as to say that taxes are prohibitive for Cascabel alone.....
If so, why was this clause even listed?

Redknight - I think J London is actually a poster used to be here called "news" - the writing style is identical and used to end up in arguments with supposed "evidence" etc. Good researcher but as you say tedious

ooops thanks Mog :-/

Zoros / Pad re : "drill hole BDH 20-03" I believe it IS leaked news.
Pad you think it relates to rock samples but the labelling of these are different: refer to this RNS: https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/SOLG/blanca-project-update-o5cswne5efdfpn2.html
Rock chip samples start with an "R" eg R01000651
Note that the drill hole logic is site letter (eg "P" for Porvenier), then "DH" assume Drill Hole - Year- then number....
Ie Porvenier first one is PDH-20-001.
Cascabel used logic CSD-16-001 etc
ON this logic Blanca is BDH-20-003 - ie this is the third hole drilled (in 2020)....

Anyone have access to level 2. Are the blocker sells back?

I already asked Solgold this morning to clarify...

Slightly off topic - although relevant. Weir have exited Oil and Gas - in favour of mining. Interesting presentation
https://www.global.weir/assets/files/investors/presentations/weir-agrees-sale-of-og-division-presentation.pdf
Interesting slides on p8, 9 with regards to copper content and projections

JB have been saying this for some time on Blanca. Blanca is listed at the bottom of the priority targets - yet with the most bonanza grades. :-|.
There is now no talk of bootstrapping - this was the buzz at the time UNTIL the concession was split. I think this is one of the keys to unlock progress, although they need CGP in their pocket to enable this... we shall soon find out

I’m still hung up on Blanca. Remember a while ago when NM was suggesting that they could bootstrap the build costs against the Blanca grades. This is totally silent now. Blanca was cause of an issue for CGP hence split of tenements a year or so back. Since then no mention of bootstrapping. This is why I believe Solg want CGP so much and I believe they are withholding info about Blanca. I predict after CGP is sorted we will get a flow of news on these bonanza grades...IMO

Thanks All - I misread the line and thought there was something we were missing. Makes sense now.. CGP=toast

" The balance of the proceeds are expected to be used for SolGold's share of the development of Alpala pursuant to agreements with the minority shareholder of Exploraciones Novomining S.A. (ENSA), Cornerstone Capital Resources Inc.".

Don't know why they have to get agreement from CGP. Any ideas?

This could be a clue - but is it too obvious. NM knows he has to get shareprice up and anything to create speculation excitement about a potential takeover or sale will do exactly that. An obvious clue or a red herring?

CD agree - and may be one of the Due Dil blocks for the FN deal.

Fully agree rcgl2 - in addition (from memory) did CGP hive/spin off their other assets so as to make a CGP a one asset company?

Is this the same broker that gave the Barrick rumour by September?

https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/australian-mining-companies-plunder-ecuadors-gold-and-copper

Interestingly it states BHP has upset locals so BHP may need Solgold to remain on board...

Interestingly one of the reasons to replace the board is to stop the FN deal.
Yet they wish to replace the board in October IMPLYING that they do not expect the deal to complete before then....

Any Chartists out there also see a cup and handle pattern developing?