Member Info for milnrowmug

Ponkey, there isn't any placing money, yet. There might not be.

Londoninv, to me the salient feature of the rns is that he did NOT say there WILL be a placing; was careful not to. Others have not read it this way: have they read it at all?

You don't need proof for a belief, it's just a belief. My belief is on some later date, and higher price, if at all.

Well it is non-committal, that's the whole point.

Facing a barrage of deramping on the theme "There's going to be a fundraise", it became necessary to make a denial statement: many posters commented on the absence of one, some no doubt genuinely. But you can't say no more fundraise when you know that further acquisitions or development projects might be necessary before earnings appear.

Imo, that is the reason for the carefully-worded reference to "Any such fundraise". There'll be one if we need it, not if we don't. I incline to trust this BoD, clearly many others don't.

Precisely. READ THE R. N. S., folks.

Read the rns?

I say perfectly worded. "Any such fundraising", NOT "The fundraising". Has everyone read this? Do they expect to know in advance what acquisitions may become possible, or whether product sales will fund future projects?

rising to the challenge of rumour-mongering numpties. There is real work to be done.

I concur with Spike, but several posters clearly don't, else they're just pretending in hope of cheap top-up. DYOR, gla.

However a placing later, @ higher sp, would mean same funds for lower dilution %.

N6 agreed. The balance of opinion here strongly pro placing; personally sceptical, looks orchestrated. Gla, remember to buy dips and slicing to balance.

Antha, "inevitable", do say why.

I (and you?) shall not be buying more, but some clearly are.

Lucky is this title an observation, hope, forecast or instruction?

Hoho, but I have some sympathy, planet can't go on like this, where will the LSE be based when L is a few fathoms down?

Realistically, we need petroleum for a while yet, and in Yorks and Lincs it will be extracted more safely and cleanly than in most of the rest of world. E.g., we still need plastics, but after Attenborough I consider that industry in need of phasing-down. Gla stay safe.

Is anyone laughing (except those able to buy .179)?

Being able to buy 10% more today might be 10% of a large number, long term.

Although it clearly hasn't caused an intemperate run of huge buys.

"Speculative"? "No impact"? Or actually a welcome and necessary step on the road to production and value?

No, stock up a few more on the cheap first.

Don't patronise him! Anyway, why do they call you Shaggy?