Member Info for milnrowmug

Pboo inside leak is a point of view.

It has also been opined on this bb that since placings, but no other critical commercial data, have been leaked, an external source is more likely. Cannot know, but I favour this view.

Fair enough Gwyn, & from a carbon emissions perspective, a lot of energy is spent assembling a vehicle, and in obtaining and preparing its constituent materials. Sure EVs emit less CO2 IN USE, but if all the hydrocarbon vehicles were suddenly scrapped & replaced; bad deal for planet & inhabitants.

Ah, but ujo is half what it was 3m ago; edr is up.

The resulting data might help a lot, DRB.

Me too sandal, but surely others are just looking to further bash-fest; those who are actual people at least.

Worry not kiddo, mis-types & mis-auto-corrects abound here. Only a few give humorous opportunity.

Heid I don't do twitter, but 1 thing in its favour; you can say *****tone. Unlike those S****horpes on LonSouE.

Heid, I never dreamt you had les amis.

If one deramp topic is suddenly denied, another may quickly be invented.

Heid, according to RNST, you have a cheerleader uniform: will you be wearing it to the Pound Party? (Which would only be 3-bag from consolidation if memory serves. Don't want to set the bar too high.)

Heid, "it must be true, I read it on twitter"? I'd much rather a rns, and the rns is great news. Gilding of lily not required.

Mirasol, if the people in your group hold yet, why would they enrubbish the share? If they have crystalised the loss and sold up, would they still be hanging around posting incessantly, sometimes several times a day? I suggest this group very small or nonexistent.

Leaking of placings was a grievous fault, I hope current income removes any need for further placing, hence leaks also.

You're expecting dips?

I think I meant educative, not educational. Other pedants please contribute.

Sandal, well I can't claim omniscience but after some observation I see it this way.

1) Boards, like this one, are infested with derampers.

2) If you were truly a holder, while you might have serious issues with the BoD, or with recent results, you would not relentlessly trash your own investment.

3) So it follows there is another incentive for this behavior.

4) On some shares shorting is given as a reason, but I accept the views, without really understanding, of those who have posted here that shorting would not be possible/effective on ujo.

5) This leaves us with those who are either paid to deramp, or hope to buy cheaper.

6) It has also been posted, that nobody pays much attention to boards like this: that you cannot alter the market sentiment by loading the doom here. I differ. No-one would be paid, and no-one would get a cheaper buy UNLESS these posts really had an effect. So, although somewhat incredibly, they must do.

7) No probs now I hope. We should be free of the vale of tears, and reach true market value. They may have other goes, here and elsewhere, but the experience has been educational.

Sandal, that's the third time you've mentioned 16p, first 2 were for today. Really, 16 will come and go but declaring an early straight-line rise within time limits: you just sound unrealistic. A supporter on the terraces chanting "Come on you Shares". The deramping gang (recast as Heid abuse tag-team since this turned) have already cornered the market in moronic irrationality; please, don't try to compete.

Really, whatever the reasons for investors, and traders, ignoring cash income; imo we are now irrevocably heading the right way. Just hope you all managed to get enough while dirt-cheap. Gla, even the numpties if you're truly invested here.

EDR is up a bit, and up on 3m ago. Their cash position is thought less good than ujo's.

Renewed interest plus small profit-taking should boost trades; they're just getting greedy imo.

And you could have got them all @11.3p! Still, that's shares folks.

Sandal, some aver there are no shorts on ujo, I don't know, don't follow shorts, think they should be illegal as in Hun country. Why do you think there are, what do you think their extent? Agreed, if there are, fun to watch burn, damnfools given what was known of Wressle. Do say what you think on shorts & why.

Gwyn & Micky; years ago these strong/buy indicators were mandatory on LonSouE, if you wanted "no opinion" you had to opt for it actively. Now No Opinion is the automatic default so most and I have gone with it. I don't think I should be giving investment advice so go with the default. If I felt very strongly; maybe.