Member Info for Millfield

LondonVP

I seriously doubt that it was TW (or one of his 6 minions) who removed your post.

You must have impressed him mightily as he reproduced it in full on his site, with appropriate comments on the content of course. I don't think he reads these boards as he thanked a reader for pointing it out.

He did not even put it behind the paywall! You must be very pleased to have reached a much wider audience.

So now they are trying to persuade insurance companies to accept the same risk.

Should be fun.

Naughty, naughty Lex – Copyright infringement?

Regardless how valid the points made within the article are, the faithful on this board will just poo-poo them and trust in their god AZ.

The suspension was certainly not in the script, and the forced publication of accounts has certainly stopped the carefully ramped share price action since September, which allowed the loan boys et al to unload. I guess they still have at least a couple of billion to dispose of, so the latest events will certainly cause a change of plan. Topping up and new punters are probably off the menu for the time being.

It will be interesting to see what happens when the suspension is lifted. If the loan boys panic then it might be a race off the blocks at opening time. For the ostriches it is maybe too late, the elephants are here.

ON YOUR MARKS……

So you only want to read the positive posts, and are demanding that those with alternative views should go away.

You surely do have a lot to learn.

Your naivety is aptly demonstrated by using the “partner” companies own business description to rate their quality. You are definitely out of order in regard to extrader, who in my opinion posts well researched and accurate information. Your hero meanwhile issues mainly smoke and mirror RNSs, some of which seem to be merely ramptastic spoofs (“option” RNS) to get the faithful to top-up, whilst the loan boys and DW get to unload into the rise. Others seem not tell the whole story (suspension), and release the bad news with a company spin to hopefully mitigate the effect.

The company is now forced to urgently produce an interim report with actual figures, and I imagine the unexpected shock might cause a touch of panic round at SYME HQ. I would guess that the loan boys still have a couple of billion to dispose of, so finding something to keep all the balls in the air must now be an urgent priority.

It will be fascinating to see what they come up with.

Of course I may be totally wrong in my view of this company, but with so many red flags flying I do not think so.

Extrader, it appears you have gained yet another follower.

Modestguy states that every poster on here who rates you as “a sleazy ratbag” (or equivalent I guess) has only half a brain.

I for one can only concur with that opinion.

I for one post to give (hopefully) good information to help others, certainly not to cause financial loss. Quite the reverse in fact, as I hate the idea of city spivs cleaning up at the expense of poorly advised amateur investors. From what I have read on this board, those I mentioned who posted negative information, acted with the same intentions - to inform, not to cause loss.

In any event, the actual shorts who post on here are so few, and with such small positions as to be unable to cause any difference to the SP.

How can any investor make a rational decision if presented only with only information gleaned from Company releases and wildly bullish posts, and denied the benefit of an alternative point of view, especially if it contains information which the Company would rather suppress? At least with the latter you can then weigh up the pros and cons to make a sensible investment decision.

may have been right when he stated in a recent post that “It might be all over soon”. I am minded to recall that good news is released promptly, bad news is held back or published at times when hopefully no-one is watching. Thus investors hoping for reassurance in the long overdue accounts may be in for a disappointment.

The rumble of approaching elephants is getting louder.

Only OSTRICHES will “Stay Tuned”

More positive research needed?

I would liken most of the “research” posted on this board to that of a boxer intently studying his opponent’s footwork, whilst being repeatedly thumped on the nose.

I would suggest that some of you might be better placed if you base your investment decisions on what the Company and its officers actually do, rather than what they say, or write in RNSs.

To my mind, apart from junior gold explorers, OPTI presents one of the best opportunities for a multi-bagger over the next couple of years.

Although end-user sales may have been held back by COVID, the fact that overweight and diabetic people are more likely to succumb to this disease must raise awareness, especially in the US, that losing the excess pounds might prove a lifesaver.

As the products have been proven to work, and have thus resulted in signed contracts with partners worldwide, I would expect that it is only a matter time before profitability explodes, especially bearing in mind the quality and financial strength of those partner organisations.

Building a small local business is difficult and can often take years to develop. OPTI is building a truly international business, and is recruiting the right personnel to ensure that the upscaling of operations proceeds smoothly. Therefore shareholders should welcome the news that high calibre people are seeing OPTI as a good career move.

Was it an option?
Was it a bet?
Or was it just a spoof to ramp the SP and allow the loan boys (and DW) to unload?

It would appear that my opinion, posted last month but promptly deleted (I wonder why?), might have been spot on.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Erxooe29VsA

Fair comment.

I should have written "because they are seen as good companies"

(Posted on here)
MMs dropping price to get more stock
IIs wanting lower price to load up
MM tree shakes

Now we get “it’s all the fault of trolls, bashers, derampers etc”

A poster on here claims EUA and GGP are “rising to the moon” because their chat has no “trolls”.

Has the poor fellow considered that their SPs may be rising because they are good companies, and that “trolls” are absent because there is nothing to criticise?

Compare the content of the latest RNS with the one dated 28th September 2020.

Can anyone explain in simple English what these sections mean –

· design of a new fast-track procedure to accelerate the due diligence process of Client Companies, which may increase the number of corporates monetised in the first transaction,

The objective of this crucial period of work by all Parties is to deliver the first transaction and create an entirely new Inventory Monetisation asset class that reflects best practice principles established in the securitisation market. It will therefore be a repeatable and scalable investment product for subsequent rounds of securitisation.

Or does it simply mean that the company has landed on “Chance” and pulled “Go back to the Old Kent Road”?

Read the RNS on here, and confirm on the LSE.

There is no further price to pay. OG will be entitled to receive 630M shares from the counterparty if the specified condition is met.

The real question should be - "Who is the counterparty?". The answer might surprise.

I am neither a bull nor a bear of this company. However I do feel obliged to comment on what I feel might be useful to investors, both current and prospective, even though I know that there is a good chance my post will be deleted.

Good, well run companies have no need to fear adverse comments on bulletin boards. Good companies will ignore short term criticism and prove detractors wrong by producing solid results and issuing factual and timely RNSs. Many companies actually follow comment on the boards to gauge shareholders reaction to their performance. Bad companies employ PR personnel to post favourable comment, and in the worst cases to abuse negative posters and even to get critical posts removed should the content be too close to the truth.

Likewise, investors in good companies should have no fear of the odd adverse comment. My observations on this board would indicate that bull posters outnumber the bears by at least 20/1, so why the rabid reaction to any negative post?

Weight of numbers not enough to outweigh your fear of negativity?

Spotify

Certainly not - More red flags than China.

However, I do find the comments here of great interest, and a real case study in small investor mentality (that is not to criticise by the way, I am too a small investor).

I just like to comment when I have something useful to contribute, either for or against.

Fiisch

Hence it is a bet at c7/2

Hi Cyprus. I will be in Liopetri for a couple of weeks from next Thursday. Unless you are in the posh Paphos end - fancy a pint in the Brothers pub?