Member Info for mikemike

ivory realised that ask the audience was not going to work . so he called a friend the friend arrives and starts repeating the bleedingly dull obvious as though it matters or makes a difference with a share that is suspended. If you have covered me in the first paragraph then you have deliberately, willfully and knowingly lied, i have not suggested anything about millionaire status at any time. what I have said and i will repeat as you appear to be hard of hearing, i will type this part slow just for you. That some of us refuse to go quietly into the night. Others like you slither out under the door begging to be forgiven for daring to have any hope at all. I will continue to dare You are the weakest link, good bye

blitzed we already know this sighhhhh But thanks anyway

I am not sure you will, you remind of those guys who die at 30 get buried at 70 and find survival in between a terrible inconvenience Do not forget to flush https://www.misterretro.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/gallery_large/goodbye_marker_0.jpg

i have far more confidence in the process than I have in you.

You was doing ok until the ban on the Hornby.... some things in life are just non negotiable

Partial annulments are much more difficult when there are 17 reasons for the appeal

I am surprised that banks still offer a walk in service for this, I know HSBC no longer offer this service

Mr Chow , suggest you listen to this again he makes it very clear that payment to GDG subsiduary will be equity. green dragon just do not have the cash to fund this programme. I will continue to sit on the sidelines for both of RG companies as his idea of transformational is way different to mine. i need to see something more than him in a video well past time he walked the walk.

'' but will be pleased some on here would will have learnt a valuable lesson.'' who are the ''some'' and what will be the valuable lesson that they will j have learned? You know the lesson that only you are smart enough to get whist others do not. You are so far up yourself you will only ever see daylight from behind your own tonsils One thing i am certain of is, if you were on the BOD then we will have surely lost

I agree that you should stop being lazy, write your concerns to DQ and post his answers that would decide if the hope is false or not, you are not qualified to decide that

ivory it is not a case of ''you don't like what I have to 'say''' it is that you do not like what anyone else has to say if it does not suit you. You have already stated that you have written this off, that is why you should slither Others have not surrendered and if they wish to share opinions to reflect their position which is they have not written this off then so be it.

Ivory trading you know as much as anyone, perhaps less yet certainly no more. You have made your personal position very clear, you would rather slide out under the door on your belly into the night. others choose to scream and shout and will not go quietly into the night., they choose to stand and fight. Your choice is accepted and respected, so please just slither off

''I would say that the MM's are trying to wring every last trade out of us, before this share goes bottoms up at the AGM on the 19th.'' I would like to believe that a full RNS update with forward plan will be delivered prior to AGM or that meeting will just be pointless. May even lead to calls for an EGM by some. Perhaps our institutional holders are already in the process of recruiting a new BOD with successful track record of taking products through not just the FDA process but other even more challenging ''gate keepers''. I for one would not be adverse to such a wholesale change.

I am not sure that ROI get a say in the annulment process. The panel will review the plea for annulment step by step over the 17 individual ''points of order'' raised by CHL. This is a proceedural issue. Should the annulment get granted. The next steps will be where the ROI will get a say.

Sperac ''Only this time ROI, Noor and Co will be emboldened by their previous success.'' You, me , we, have no idea what they are thinking or how they are feeling or going to d feel if a full annulment is ordered. they may think it is their worst nightmare. why? because it could mean that the hearing will now consider the higher claim. The new hearing may ask the uncomfortable questions that the ROI do not want to answer. Noor may refuse to testify and this time anything he says will not be accepted. Putra may have to answer why he was not an employee when he was etc. We do not know what we do not know. we can but speculate

Sperac If that was the only reason for annulment, then it is is going to be a challenge. Churchill have identified 17 reasons, we have many opportunities. That KK has been weighed, measured and found wanting could be to our advantage

Interesting, except when the arbiters decide that providing proof such as the register is too burdensome. If the arbiters had requested the register and it was not surrendered, the ''adverse reference' may well become applicable.

They do not have to give reasons for declining the application. as such it makes this very NOT straightforward. The risk in doing that is of course apparent.

Thanks guys, not sure how i missed an RNS lets hope there are no hidden declarations of interest by any of these guys.

where are these details its not on the churchill web page yet