Member Info for Metamorphosis84

Just a couple of my favourite Bandit greatest hits.

13.11.18- IRV
"Don’t worry - no more posts from me for a few months when this price has recovered and the nervous have lost more money by buying high and selling low."

It was 38p then and no longer listed now.

Then there is this classic over at VOD 25.1.19

"EBITDA and FCF key to preserve div cover margin which they reiterate so no issues for me and some will happily ignore those who post multiple times before the market even opens as they are short or want to get back in lower. I expect a rise today as this has been bashed down too far and when dividend is reinvested by many next week this will slowl6 grind back upwards ahead of f/y and statement on dividend."

Since which their fy results were crap, SP is down 10% and the div has been cut.

For someone who professes to be so expeirienced, makes a lot of mistakes.

Ah Bandit, what a character, had a few run ins, I'm on filter now...

Same gambit on VOD and IRV
"Hedge funds pay posters to spread bad news"
"You're filtered"
"This will turn out well"
"I'll be back in a few months to prove you all wrong"

He never comes back, a patronising, rude and offensive know it all. I must admit to feeling some schadenfreude knowing that the clown has lost so much money on his toilet investments.

"@metemorphosid. In the event that a court awarded an amount per share to all shareholders then anyone net short at yhr moment the shares were suspended would have to pay. It's the same as when a dividend is payed."

Oh right I see. So in your imaginary court case, if you went long, you would get paid back because you would claim that you were misled into going long.

What if those who went short claimed that they were misled into going short?

"Who is actually bringing a court case"

No one.

Ok just to humour you and to try and answer that remarkably silly question:

Who in a court would you be seeking to sue?

Your whole fictitious scenario is based on the premise that:
1. The Supreme Court rules that some one can be sued, presumably the BOD or the administrators, in the event of liquidation.
And
2. That ruling is backdated.
3. That a case is brought against said BOD and Lenders
4. That His Honour The Judge Lollington finds in your favour.

Then seeing as I am neither a member of the BOD, or a lender, no I would have nothing to lose in your fictitious court case.

"Who's bringing a court case?"

No one.

Not Pearls, nor SPD, Ashley, my pal KnigelK, or Wooton.

None of them.

They all have the same in common, windbags.

This share has now been given the Metamorphosis kiss of death.

Interesting article, well worth a read before opening positions.

https://www.constructionenquirer.com/2019/05/16/kier-project-and-commercial-teams-at-loggerheads/

SJ is right, support and resistance levels have clearly emerged.

Looks like another Debtenhams, please Pearls, don't tell me you have spent what left of your rather sparse piggy bank on buying Metro and Thomas Cook shares?
You just don't learn, do you.

"shareholders deserve more answers - from the BoD - MA - even the lenders - has the debt now "disappeared" in exchange for the equity they now have as the new owners?"

Well they aren't going to come on this BB to give you the answers you want are they?

What are you going to do about it- other than pose the question on a BB that none of those people read?

Oh yeah, nothing. Windbag.

Very good thanks. So nothing to do with Debenhams then.

"the Supreme Court Ruling"
"the Supreme Court Ruling"
"the Supreme Court Ruling"

WHAT SUPREME COURT RULING?!?!?!

You are literally making something up that doesn't exist and then talking about it as though it is a matter of fact!

Or maybe you really mean "possible Supreme Court Ruling" in which case this is just the whole "SPD have made an offer" nonsense all over again.

Piers Moron, wasn't he sacked from the Mirror over a fake photo that he saw fit to publish?

Just look at todays listings and give your marks out of 10, I'll give you mine.
Good Morning Britain- 2/10
Lorraine - 2/10
Dickinson's Real Deal -1/10
This Morning - 5/10
--low brow so far, will it improve?
Nope
-Loose Women 2/10
-Itv News and Weather 7/10
-Judge Rinder -1/10
-Dickinsons Real Deal (again) 1/10
-Tipping Point 3/10
-The Chase 3/10
-Itv News and weather 7/10
-Emmerdale 5/10
-Corro 5/10
-Tonight 6/10
-Emmerdale 5/10
-Martin Clunes Travels 4/10
-easyjet Inside the Cockpit 3/10
-Itv news and Weather 7/10
-The Last Debate 6/10
-Great Art, 0/10 (really is anyone watching by then)

I mean seriously, does anyone watch this crap? With the vast choice of entertainment available, box sets, quality sports, news and current affairs, it is difficult to see how ITV can be seen as an investment opportunity at all.

Poor He'shopeless, taking a lot of stick here today, undeservedly IMO. Every BB needs their milk monitor to keep everyone in check.

Mr Peacock, I can well believe that you work in retail, (haberdashery department?). It goes a long way towards explaining you clueless ness when it comes to investing.

"
It may seem to you that it's the job of Directors to load companies with debt, but maybe it's also investors jobs to avoid highly geared buisnesses with wafer thin margins and poor management. if they don't undersatnd or can't live with the risk."
This post. Really should be the last word on this sorry state of affairs.

It won't be.

The prevailing attitude amongst some seems to be
"I've made a terrible decision and its everybody elses fault."

"It seems the job of directors nowadays is to load companies with debt and enter administration with them, to prolong their jobs."

Of course that isn't there job, but this is what happens in reality on many occasions.
And yet there will still be mugs screaming "strong buy"

Easy pickings for shorters, rinse and repeat.

Ha ha so where's this RNS?

There is a plan? Right?

I think anyone who is responding to Pearls is humouring him now. Not that they have to justify their continued interest to you PC Plod or anyone else for that matter.

Only a real saddo would claim to filter people then come back to stalk them