RE: How many more clues do people need?28 Aug 2020 16:25
DD - Yes i believe the valuation of AVCT is overweight. I like the business and I agree it has great long term potential, but it's not a buy for me at $400m mcap for sure. If you can show me a sensible modelling that shows Avct is undervalued at £400m, i'll sell half my ODX and buy it up. But i suspect that is impossible. It was purely driven up on PI speculative buying, and they have been working hard to prop it up and justify it since without any tangible progress. Talking about billion dollar markets like they own them. Saying the antigen tests are going to sell for up to $30 and make them for $1.
I'll give you some further points....
I keep hearing when this gets debated, yeah but it's not just about Covid. I think investors are confused. They have this idea what the covid tests is worth and when anyone questions it they try to counter it by saying, yeah but it's not just Covid. Does anyone actually have any idea what it's worth???
Fincapp broker note 3rd February should give us an idea, since it was before Covid. At the time the share price was circa 26p. Fincapp had a target price of 76p. As far as i can see, there has been very little progress in the core business. They then raised at 18p due to cash flow concerns due to Covid, but Fincapp reiterated the price target of 76p. I can't see any developments in the core business that justifies the 26p to 76p target price gap being closed. Fincapp broker note suddenly comes out with all these wild valuations on the fundraise that they have never spoken about before. The fact is the growth is purely because people have got carried away with Covid potential counting billions in sales before they even have a product. The CEO mentioned some wildly optimistic figures in a presentation and things have got out of hand IMO. I can see one update on the core business since 2 Feb which might have added 20% to the share price, which looks generous. So i have to assume at least £1.20 of the share price is weighted on Covid, so around $300m.
I like what they are doing and if they deliver in time with therapeutics there is huge upside, but sorry for me the valuation is 3-5 years ahead of itself if you are arguing it is due to the core business and if your arguing it's based on covid tests then as i said this prices in a hell of a lot of future sales. I hope I have given a fair account of why, and if anyone can show me a valuation model that proves otherwise i'll gladly look at it and review my opinion. Apologies for talking about this on here, but wanted to give my reasons on earlier points as others have questioned it.
Happy to be proven wrong.
ODX is much simpler to value future potential. You know the capacity you know the unit prices, do the maths at whichever utilisation rate you think will be achieved. Use a low income multiplier of 5, more likely should be 8-10, and you can model valuations and get much higher than we have today.