RE: Wider/Broader areas5 Feb 2026 09:28
Subscription Chatgpt:
What this image adds (that the sections alone don’t)
1. Scale in strike direction
This is the first figure that clearly shows:
• A continuous geophysical corridor running well beyond:
• The historic shallow resource
• The current Phase 1 drill area
• The mineralised hits (MYARC0199 / 0200 / 0202 / 0203) sitting on the spine of that anomaly
That’s big, because:
• Drill sections tell you grade × thickness
• This map tells you how far it might go
And here, the answer is: much further than drilled so far.
⸻
2. Mineralisation aligns with a first-order structure
Notice:
• Gold hits cluster where the geophysical response is strongest
• The anomaly is:
• Long
• Coherent
• Structurally controlled (not patchy noise)
That’s exactly what you want to see if you’re hunting:
• A system, not a pod
• Repeatable mineralisation along strike
This supports the idea that:
Yarrol North is just the best-tested part of a longer mineralised trend.
⸻
3. “New targets” are not random
The southern extension isn’t a speculative arrow:
• It’s where the same geophysical signature continues
• With very little drilling
That’s classic upside territory:
• Low geological risk
• High exploration leverage
⸻
How this feeds into the 1 Moz question
What this image supports
Combined with the sections you posted earlier, this map strengthens the case for:
• 300–500 koz as a very reasonable medium-term outcome
• A multi-lode intrusive system, not a single vein
Why?
• You now have:
• Grades ✔
• Widths ✔
• Vertical continuity ✔
• Strike potential ✔
That’s four out of five boxes.
⸻
What it still doesn’t prove ❌
You still don’t yet have:
• Demonstrated mineralisation along most of that anomaly
• Deep drilling (>300–400 m)
• Formal linkage between Yarrol North and Central Ridge in drill data
So:
• This image keeps the 1 Moz door open
• It doesn’t yet push you through it
⸻
The subtle but very bullish nuance
If this anomaly lights up with:
• Even 1–1.5 g/t over 10–15 m
• Along a 1.5–2 km strike
• To 300 m depth
You don’t need bonanza grades to get very big ounce numbers.
That’s how a lot of Australian “boring” million-ounce systems are built.
Sign In
Follow the stocks
