Member Info for Mattyboy-

2 weeks to launch.

2 weeks to launch.

All as per timetable previouly given.

2 weeks to launch of the first 2 products.

Start of December is 2 weeks away for the first 2 products as per previous RNS.

2 product lines launching in December - we knew that so no delay.
Rest of the product portfolio by Feb....great news.

SCB…hardly ‘the unmasking of Kendo Nagasaki’ is it?

Be nice if he bought a decent chunk, make a statement of confidence.

....Brigger and Tiger BOTH ramping MTRO and attempting to talk down CBX.

Pretty lame.

Thanks Lobo....I think it's very important to remember when talking about MCC production, that one of Nanoco's primary aims is to create uniformity of size(for display purposes at least).That goal makes the production technique and the differences between different techniques that much more critical. So in essense,0-40% difference in size is just not good enough.

Pretty much that Feeks.....'why didn't you state that crude oil was not an ingredient of that cake'?......'well why would I,it's utterly irrelevant?.......'just answer the question'!!

Or....'asides from eggs,flour and milk....you offered no opinion on crude oil....is that right?'

And here ;

WILSON...''·My question is, when the two of
them taken together, Zaban and Ptatschek,
you don't dispute that together they have
disclosed each limitation of the
challenged claims under that ground; is
that correct?''
· · · · ·MR. NEWMAN:· Objection.
COSSAIRT...''· I think --
· · there would be no reason for
· · somebody to look at Ptatschek
· · in wanting to make these nano --
· · or in thinking about the syntheses
· · in Zaban, because Zaban deals with
· · the synthesis of indium phosphide
· · quantum dots, and Ptatschek deals
· · with II-VI materials exclusively.''

WILSON...'' All right.· I understand that
you have the opinion that a person of
ordinary skill in the art would not
combine those two references, but that
wasn't my question

And also here ;

WILSON...''· But, you know, putting aside,
you know, whether a person of ordinary
skill in the art would have been
motivated to combine those two references
and whether Ahrenkiel discloses two
precursors that contain first and second
ions, you do not dispute that Lucey and
Ahrenkiel together disclose every other
limitation of the challenged claims of
the '365 patent; is that right?''
· · · · ·MR. NEWMAN:· Objection.
COSSAIRT...'' Well, I think it is
· · true.· You wouldn't combine these
· · two because of Lucey discourages
· · the use of chlorine-containing
· · precursor compounds and Ahrenkiel
· · teaches their use.''

It appears to me that Wilson is saying that 'putting aside the opinions you have made, you have made no other opinions'?

Certainly not easy to digest.Spent this morning reading thru and I'm not a lot wiser truth be told.
Seemed to me that Cossairt was being led away from expressing a true opinion,which when she did seemed to stand out against the points of law with which Wilson was trying to shackle her.
WILSON...''·So putting to the side your
opinion that a person of ordinary skill
in the art would not combine Banin with
either Herron or Farneth, you do not
dispute that Banin, taken together with
either Herron or Farneth, discloses every
limitation of the challenged claims of
the '828 patent, correct?
COSSAIRT...'' I guess I am just sort of
puzzled by the question because the Banin
doesn't -- doesn't teach seeded --
yeah -- Banin doesn't teach seeded growth
in the way it is being applied in the
patent.· And how Herron and Farneth are
combined with Banin is to use these
clusters in the Banin technique as seeds
for SLS.
· · · · ·But these clusters absolutely
cannot serve as seeds under those
conditions, so it just -- the combination
is very broken in my mind.· And so I am
having a hard time answering you.''

And also ;

WILSON...''Nowhere in your declaration do
you provide an opinion that if a person
of ordinary skill in the art were to
combine Banin and Braun, that that
combination would not disclose any other
limitation other than the MCC; is that
correct?''
· · · · ·MR. NEWMAN:· Objection.
COSSAIRT...'' I just don't
· · think anyone looking at Banin
· · would have anything to learn from
· · Braun, because one's an
· · aqueous-based synthesis and one's
· · an organic phase SLS reaction, and
· · they are totally incompatible.''

Delighted with SP action following our 10% rise on Tuesday.
No dip back....very positive.

BTBanker...no doubt this means that in no uncertain terms there is a placing coming....probably on Monday??

...all been staged.

Can anyone share the new Times article as I’m not subscribed?
All I can read is that ‘Stifel the investment bank has reiterated to clients to buy Microfocus stock…’

Bang on Panda....the sale has proved that the current SP is a nonsense.
Bang on Op...all about confidence.

Based on your earlier post Panda.....we should be £10 minimum.

Thanks lobo…and voluntarily locked in most importantly, based on what info they were given access to if what you surmise is true.
Thanks.