RE: Really...?17 Aug 2021 11:41
You make a very good point Lunchmoney and I have engaged in several discussions in the past on various Boards on the subject of RNSs...
In the context of Solgold, I think people have developed an unsurprising expectation that virtually everything has to be RNSed if it seems sexy...that's down to the fact that Nick pretty much DID RNS everything in 2019 and 2020...
So, for example, I didn't notice any complaints about anything Keith said in any of his recent podcasts/conferences, even though some of it was new and relevant to our view of the share price.
Nor did anyone complain when the likes of DBW and myself reproduced faithfully Keoth's statements or answers to questions.
Why for example di nobody complain that he was disclosing inside information when he said PFS in October or, later , PFS Q4; or his statements on Production dates 2025/2029.
Because its no big deal.
As an AIM GFD I had to lead 'beauty parades/roadshows' pre IPO and after we were trading. I often presented new information or answered questions with stuff that would influence investors decisions but none of it ever had to be RNSed...
For reasons I have already stated, I DO understand inside information and the practical definition of materiality.
The trouble is, when people are invested in companies where virtually everything that moves gets RNSed (clearly for the purpose of getting the share price up), they get conditioned to a belief that everything that moves MUST be RNSed.
RNS's cost money.
In roadshows, investor calls, podcasts and conferences, new information will always come out.
But I am very clear that a good example is this:
"Best hole ever drilled..." is hearsay, opinion or 'puff' (Google marketing puffery...)
1.5% for 300 metres from hole 23 (which has been assayed and asserted to be true) imust be RNSed before informal release...
(BTW that was a made up example...)
Hope this helps