Member Info for Mathersfinger

NMM,

You need to clarify your last sentence a bit better imo, up to the court date with proof of intention, also funding is in place for that intention.

Not after the court sitting which approves the JCC bid, just to be clear

Q

Last post to you tonight, the word is inference in the context of your previous posts and tonight’s

We shall see

RE BHP

When they bought out Oz mining in 2023, they used the cash S.o.A

Q

You did not answer my post did you?

Wisest investor

Diverse book

BHP would have diluted us to hell

Thank you for that latest out burst on me being a Rac*st, I have 1 year from the date I saw them, will post this latest to them, then we will see who’s a prat

PS

You being an upright citizen, with a good balanced view of the world and all the different cultures, don’t you think that’s a bit narrow minded of you?

Even our Nigel Farage has a good balanced view of the British situation, you could learn from him

Pleased to see you and Q are buddies again

You really take the biscuit calling someone here Nieve

The boards wisest investor in his own words, the diverse book will protect us from a low bid

Then blame the Chinese for your bad investments

If BHP managed to buy us out some years ago say for 50p, do you not think they would have promoted Solgold as a great purchase and got the sp to rise significantly, then issue more shares to pay for all works to production, all the time diluting the shares held by us

That’s how they role, what’s the difference or are you Rac*st

Funny old world

Under the city code of take overs etc, hedge funds can sell their shares to a takeover bidder, under specific rules

Why buying once a fixed bid has been accepted by the board

Why is the question? Small percentage profit?

Or go against bid to hopefully get a better offer

Or sell too the bidder for favourable terms in the future in a business sense

Let us see what others can glean by researching, games afoot lol

Needy

Ooopps left off a few nought, $750,000,000

See anything is possible

Needy

Forgot to mention Franco and co, they offered up $750,000 for a small percentage of gold, now do that for silver, then for copper.

This time all minerals shared between miner and smelters, not so far fetched is it, well not in my little head

Needy

That’s the difference between you and me, which to be fair I’m grateful for, I look at scenarios which could and have happened many times before, not just in mining.

I’m just looking at possibilities that would make my holding a darn better, we shall see, that’s all we can do

At least it gives you something to go on about and leave others alone, do your thing Needy and have a good day mate

Arok

Totally agree with your post, although we still have time for the counter bids, maybe a consortium will come in, having read about how tight it’s becoming to secure future minerals.

Have been doing as much research as I can on someone coming in to counter JCC, which to be fair there are some, it comes down to cash flow and financial borrowing costs imo

Looking at smelters needing to secure future copper ore, smelters for future precious metals and miners needing new sites for their future, this to me should be the catalyst for a consortium.

Miners and smelters have forward contracts for years with conditions attached, therefore if you require these minerals, what better way to get your supply for the future is through a consortium of all three

Keep reading about the initial Capex needed, but shared between three, all of a sudden seems very reasonable.

I know I’ve gone off tangent here, but to counter the Chinese consortium behind JCC, I can only surmise this is what would be needed, can the west lose more to the Chinese who will have the complete package to deal with these minerals

Grasping at straws? Maybe, but when the future of these businesses are at stake and value involved, I believe this is where we might get a counter from

That’s it from me for now, going back on my meds and going to turn my poor little brain off as it hurts

Atb

Rodney

How could the existing board continue as is, they have shown their weak hand for reasons spelt out in the RNS

I hear a new board is needed, at what cost for new to take over from old, time taken and basically back to square one

Other argument is take offs, I would agree if we had the infrastructure in place to even start mining, which we have none.

Who wants to put in money for our minerals when there is no direction again, we thought we had cracked it when the board showed some momentum, Franco and co take off was brilliant, then apathy set in once again

We need a counter bid, it’s possible up to the last minute, failing that, I would gladly accept the offer, hate the thought of going backwards with this shower of a board

Totally frustrated and pee’d off with them , filling their pockets and running to the hills

Rodney

Who is scaremongering? Does the money mentioned in the RNS from last September give you confidence in going forward as a progressive company?|

I personally hope a counter bid comes, if not a win for 28p by JCC, I hate the thought of being in a position of weakness which you seem to be enthusiastic about, can you explain why Solgold would be in a position of strength after this fiasco?

Love to hear your thoughts how Solgold can go on further with realistic statements

Latest rns shows a new holder, quite a few now joining in, not sure why?

Anyone have some solid info/ opinion on why?

Needy

It wasn’t about who’s right or wrong, it was just the simplistic view, should the S.o.A fail its just carry on regardless, it won’t be in my opinion

Rodney

Yes you may well be happy to hold if the S.oA fails, but the consequences are dire imo, how many others here are happy to hold for a very long period to sort out this mess with a much lower sp.

This is why I prefer my outcome to yours

Rodney,

Typical knee jerk reaction, I want what you all want, why the hell am I still holding all my shares? I am hoping for a counter bid, it should come with what we have

If it doesn’t then what I described in my previous post will happen imo, I’m not anti Solgold ffs, I’m seeing it through my eyes if no one counters the Chinese bid, simple as that

Smickster

Why no counter bid for such a rich resource?

Can you give a time line for all those changes mentioned?

No progress while all this happens, dilution and sp tanks imo

This won’t be a five minute job

Rodney, in my opinion you paint a very simplistic view of the consequences should this bid fail, firstly you need to ask yourself why did no other major make a bid for us, a tier 1 mine, next to it a open pit mine showing good results, plus many tenements across Ecuador?

Does this not raise a red flag to you?

You say get rid of the board and install a new one, that simple is it?

Major disruption to Solgolds progress whilst new board is found, then agree wages with huge bonuses, plus bonuses for reaching certain goals.

The board leaving will have contracts to be honoured or cash incentives to leave

Mean while the sp will tank, why? No other miner came forward with a counter bid, red flag, this could go very low and be there for a long period.

Whilst I want what everyone here wants, a fair price for such a rich resource, but if the markets are not going for it you need to ask why?

Personally I do not want to be stuck here in limbo for years at a low sp, constantly being diluted to cover for this or that. It’s hard to get more take offs for our resources when we are not even miners, I believe we could be looking into a black hole.

Before you just rattle off another essay, give some answers to the things I’ve raised, this will then show the board your argument v mine, also how easy it will be for Solgold to carry on after this scenario.

Atb

Had to use this for updates

https://investing.thisismoney.co.uk/quote/SOLG