Member Info for matherdj

Yep, agreed. A nice clear acutely tangible statement as always.

'We expect to conclude this agreement, which is subject among other conditions to shareholder approval, early in the second half of 2018.'. As always you could take this as concluding the terms of the agreement, but to me it reads as if the whole matter should be concluded by then.

Fitlekchiel, I assume you will be attending the AGM then? You can put your opinions to the bod face-to-face there.

That depends on what news is delivered by then and whether it's good or bad, if there is any at all. Simply put, nobody knows patch.

Steve, its kn1 not nt1. I've read your posts now for some months and wondered when someone would correct you. A bit like Trigger calling Rodney Dave in only fools and horses. Meant in jest :)

I don't think anyone can be condemned for having doubts drewky. Its been a difficult time, not helped by the lack of supporting comms to help shareholders through what appears to be a very unproductive year. I think that things will move quite fast after the farmout has concluded and hopefully along with the license, but if you look on past performance, there is nothing to suggest it will. However, if you look forwards, there is no reason why it shouldn't change if the bod step up, demand increases as predicted and funds are in place. Plenty of prospects on the horizon including ch1 drill which then allows eps to move on, ks1 which can be moved to production quite easily under existing agreements and seismic over nyuni for the next journey. The next year or so will be very telling.

The spread isn't being reported correctly and those 2.69s look like buys to me. Maybe the spread is more like 2.6-2.75

:-)

His average was 1.9 apache. I think he bought from about 7 down. All pretty irrelevant don't you think?

Dunder, hindsight is a wonderful thing, but a year ago they were fully funded and no one could have predicted it would take so long to drill what originally was a back-to-back drill. So, with your crystal ball, why don't you stick your neck out and tell us what you think will happen over the next year? Many items planned to choose from, so which do you think will have progressed by then and by how much?

Thanks for that dcode. You've obviously dyor.

Is that finger in the air again willow? As for the deal, there little point discussing it when they haven't announced what the deal is. @chrisp I know what you mean about reduced drill costs pro rata to farmout, probably prompted by the financials. Like Irish, I think that's a very short term view. Many other means of bridging the gap.

Don't forget that flow rates weren't determined by the well but by what the tdpc wanted it to produce. That will remain the case and we'll find out when we get there. Demand is growing so I hope they need the same or more by that time.

I thought they'd be sending a ferret down with a torch, gas mask and a nail file. Much cheaper than the compressor option. Maybe give him some amphetamine to speed things up. RNS Monday?

So don't?

A share will come through on its own merits at the end of the day. I'm not too fussed about headlines etc on these boards. The next year will be very interesting and give us the direction we deserve as holders (I think).

To be fair, power play has a point overall and not specific to you and Pete's conversation. It's been a difficult year with some unsavory characters, but debate that shows the good and bad, is healthy and it is often that the bad is jumped on as trying to talk down the share rather than, as I see it, positive that all angles are posted. There are also those who only post positive and completely disregard any negative. It's been good lately as a lot of the bull***t has disappeared. Can't say the same for the advfn board at the mo!

Hey Drewky, what's the generic email address for the blog I can send to?

Some of those look like sells. Spread is not reported correctly. More like 3-3.1.

What's your reason for 1p willow? Why not 2p or 0.5p? Or are you just making sweeping statements?