No Subject1 Mar 2025 23:25
OK, by any definition of the word I am a shareholder, that fact is incontrovertible, the value or voting rights of my shareholding in the grand scheme of 39 billion shares in issue is an irrelevance.
Rather than attack the person it's perhaps better to debate the issues, question the company, ask the questions about the financial position as it stands, what the money that was recently raised has been used for, how the priority debts will be paid, if the staff at Zulu have been paid and if the management team are still drawing salaries
The RNS for the failed raise stated the company needed funds for staff salaries, contractor payments, partial payment of the VAT bill and site development. That raise failed and George decided to change what the money would be used for, now site development and ongoing costs. Some contractors took shares and dumped them onto the market. Staff wages still haven't been paid nor has the VAT bill, I've had this confirmed from Wilna after a conversation with George.
You can attack me all you want.
When we invest in a company we do so with the best of intentions, we believe in the company we put our money into and we, to a certain extent, become blinded to the facts that are presented to us, even when those facts say it's time to get out.
PREM is just one of those companies that had so much promise, a CEO that talked the talk and spent money on projects that would be beneficial.
Sadly those projects weren't beneficial, the company has produced Zero value for shareholders, wild promises from the CEO have resulted in massive losses for shareholders.
It's time to take stock, look objectively at the company and ask yourself if I wasn't invested would I put my money in for a long-term investment?
I doubt anyone would be able to say that they would.
Look logically at the company and then make a decision, a share that's currently worth 1/50th of a penny in PREM that's likely to become Zero, could well be worth a lot more invested elsewhere.