RE: Elephant in the room?25 Oct 2018 12:59
Food for thought..
Looking back through the Edison report April 18.
It points out Tullow was targeting resources of 125mmbbls at C1, but lets look further at D&M’s Mean Estimate for just PEL 37 alone.
D&M has prepared the assessment of licence area EL 0037 offshore Namibia in accordance with the Petroleum Resources Management System (PRMS) approved by the Society of Petroleum Engineers, the World Petroleum Council, the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, and the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers.
D&M’s Mean Estimate for the total 11 Leads is 8.7 Billion Barrels of Gross Prospective (recoverable) Oil Resources
https://pancon.com.au/project/walvis-basin-el-0037/
Tullow may just now believe all these prospects in PEL 37 could have suffered the same fate, but also that of its neighbour, Osprey too.. It is a huge question whether they will go ahead and drill Osprey at all.
Edison report states.. 'One such fan that would be de-risked is the Osprey fan in PEL 30 immediately to the north of PEL 37 and in which Tullow holds a 15% WI.'
So, that is another 245.5mmbbls possibly generated and migrated.
In total, I don't think its too unreasonable to think an average total of just over 9 billion barrels of oil could have been generated from Commorant, Albatross, Seagull and gannet N, Seagull and Gannet S, and the other 7 leads, on PEL 37 plus Osprey on PEL 30 and migrated..?
If the above has happened, where is it? On trend to the North is PEL 10 (GBP) and on trend to the south is PEL 82 (Galp/Exxon)
As previously posted, the regional highs and lows of the basin may just reveal the answer.