Member Info for Markshares

also visible on the morningstar site, albeit older figures too:

https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/xlon/ORPH/ownership

I suspect a nice rise on the back of ISA renewal today, who else is topping up at these levels?

4:30 RNS it looks like

A bit worrying to see someone who holds as high as 20% selling really, isn't it. Do we think they have inside knowledge of upcoming drill results?

Tomorrows the big day isnt it, what are we all expecting in the RNS?

Nah

Well, more importantly he also stated news on a spin off was expected around now

*potentially

I think SGS's interest in CHIMs paves the way for a buyout from them down the line. They have always been the most likely to and buying out ORPH completely corners the market for them. Why potentionally compete when you can have a monopoly and charge a premium?

Does anyone have the links for the arden and finncap broker notes?

Ok earache, you are so wrong on everything you wrote but I don't want to become as easy to dislike as you and clog up the board in ever enlargening posts so you have won by method of attrition, if that is your aim with your continual verbatim posts then fair play to you. Shall filter you now to resist the temptation to reply the next time you say apples have a remarkable orange-y taste

Also, I'd like to point out your very flawed view on private investors, perhaps we can start with:
1) "we own none of it", together I'm sure we own far more than he does.
2) We are what bolsters the share price while Invesco sells, not him, not any other institions, together we are doing all of the buying and making sure the SP doesn't collapse in the presence of a large seller.
3) When his time comes to sell, he needs someone to buy his shares from him. Sure, we would all like to see the company bought out in one when that times comes, but if there isn't a buyer, all that good will and effort he puts in will pay dividends (no pun intended) to the happier private investors.
4) Voting power - to have private investors and with no significant majority holder is very important when it comes to voting things though general meetings.
5) "Duties of Care, Loyalty and Disclosure
The duty of loyalty requires that a CEO always acts in the best interest of a business's shareholders", its literally written in law that he should act in the nest interest of shareholders.

CF does a wonderful job at managing the relationship with small private investors, but you should not discount our importance in all of this, when collectively we are the largest holder by far.

A couple of big buys popping up around 10am this morning; 270,000, £18.66k

Yes I realised that afterwards. Do we presume some of their "friends" or effectively them under another name will take the rest?

Do we effectively have a pretty much guaranteed raise within the next week at 10p, ~40% premium to the current price? That's going to look really nice when it drops

Ricky, I have a stupidly large holding already, so I am happy to be more strict with any relatively unplanned top ups now

I was actually going to take a very large chunk today in anticipation of the ISA rise, now I feel too stuboorn to do so. Wanted it sub 30p

Not even joking, but does anyone have a currently active AIM share that is more of a dog than this?

Worst CEO on AIM?

LongInvestments, I dont think that's what he meant you wally

I mentioned april 7th as if news dropping at 7am on April 6th would be too early to buy in

Oh wait seafox are at just under 30% already and going over the boundary would need a compulsory offer, right? So I guess now their plan is to dilute significantly at the 10p they always wanted, giving them a vast majority holding then perhaps buy out the remainder for XXp?