Member Info for Markshares

No.

I want an Immutex dividend early so I can buy more ORPH

One of the clearest ascending triangles you're likely to see, here, look like either this time or the next it will break 41

Do you mean SImplywallstreet, Barwick? You realise articles like that are written by bots/programs, not people?

The morningstar link? None of those were in the last week? The most recent with movement was L&G UK Smaller Companies R Acc back in October

I'd add impatient to that list, KTRB

Deepjoy, how do you know what II bought and sold last week?

Have you read the guardian article from today on boohoo labour being paid as low as 29p an hour? I don't think the bad press is going away any time soon

Given the hostile way they do business, I don't feel the current board could give any less of a monkeys about private investors or anyone else for that matter. Think you have to hope whatever happens is good as a side effect rather than an intention

Wasn't PANR due some number earlier this week?

I'm calling BS, Bronx, since saying you sold the majority of your holding youve been trying to talk the share price down and it's obvious if you had any actual facts to do that, you would share them. Instead to try to vaguely infer information so as to avoid being called out on specific lies posted as facts.

Yeah I find it funny how we dropped on the news of a vaccine when everyone instantly thinks covid is gone forever, yet dont climb on news that the first vaccines won't last very long, might kill you themselves, that a new variant is discovered and infection levels are through the roof.

No, you're looking for a cheaper entry

Bronx, I have zero qualms at all with you or anyone selling and in fact it's been the right call for you as you can already buy in Cheaper, it's the slew of negative comments that follow your decision that I have a problem with

Bronxville, don't be that guy, you've said you sold out half your holding yesterday and have now done 6 negative posts in a row.

Yes deepjoy, a share buy back would be preferential (to me at least) rather than watch months of a slow churn of sales from Invesco though in all honesty I don't think they will be selling anytime soon. CF will probably be keeping them far more in the loop than we are and will be keen to keep them onboard where possible

Could be to maintain the latest share price figure when people go to check OPRH or more likely, it will be small investors playing with apps like freetrade where there are no commissions

Why all this insistence that institutions are selling? According to morning star most of the small holdings left some time ago and the volume eat the moment is pitiful. If IIs were selling we'd see higher price action and bigger volume

I was reading between the lines in yesterday's interview and the main thing I took from it was in relation to the wearables, I think it implied the wearables deals will wait until ethics approval on the challenge study before being signed. That's not to say they wouldn't still sign a deal without COVID data, but you'd have to assume it would be a lower value if it was only based on historical data.

What was noticeable to me was a change in language from CF to be more affirmative in a wearable deal coming - much more of a "we will sign them, and there will be many of them" rather than "we are in talks with" as the previous line was. What this infers is a belief that covid challenge studies ethical sign off is a given, that multiple wearable deals following from that is a given, and because the deals will be an ongoing licensing deal rather than a one-off, it means that is a presumption of future contracts, especially in relation to COVID.

There was a lot less passive language than previously and I only really detected a slight embarrassment in slippage of the timings, a bit of a "I know it's a bit later than expected, but please bear with us, we've done so well for you so far, and one more month and you'll be over the moon again"

Trader, SGS makes perfect sense as he said he had retained a good relationship with them and would fulfill the criteria of leaving people "bemused" at the location of it.