Member Info for MarkPatrick

Anything can be sorted, at a cost. Helium is valuable and becoming more valuable by the minute because supply is at risk. The RoI is becoming more attractive - higher costs are tolerable.

The economic risks here for the transition from discovery to development to commerciality need to be considered through the eyes of off-takers/suppliers, who all of a sudden need to balance the risk of constrained supply. Good for investors in HE1.

IMO, the situation in The Gulf materially changes the risk for suppliers, with failure to maintain supply being existential in the near term, combined with material uncertainty going forward. That is very different to a week ago and will drive different risk management decisions, not just to deal with the near term tactical risks - it also exposes wider strategic supply issues.

BB: in normal times, your perspective is one of a number of reasonable perspectives. This is no longer normal. The risk/reward has materially shifted and may drive different behaviours by majors. A combination of cash and immediate access to the necessary capabilities could accelerate this to production quickly.

Kread: you’re seriously suggesting that people should read and be influenced by MF? Give your head a wobble.

I can sell 28m on HL at .57p

I can get 0.67p for 20 million on HL.

Svend: I have to say that your patience and willingness to explain again and again. Admirable.

Retirment: ‘don't listen to nay one (sic) on you tube is my advice to people esp advisors’ - I would add forum self-publicists (like Retirment) to those that one should ignore.

I can sell 15m @ 0.441 on HL. To be clear, I’m not selling though!

Retirment: I suspect I may be one of the three you’re referring to as a ‘troll’ (the reality is I just call you out on the misleading narcissistic nonsense you post, as do others). I personally don’t like guessing (although I’m perfectly happy for those that do) and I don’t have the skills or experience to make more of an educated judgement that I can stand behind. That’s it. No more no less. You of course, constantly over-state your ability and try to irrationally influence others to your own ends. That’s why I call you out.

I think that was my buy.

SF: BA is BAE.

Retirment: I don’t know you or Svend. I can only attempt to assess your respective qualities by what I read hear. I don’t think - and I suspect most here would agree - that Svend is an idiot or a tool. But, I do know of someone here who does consistently exemplify both of those labels. Enough said.

Retirment: a failed attempt at a subtle de-ramp - a bit like a first draft of a Motley Fool article!

Retirment's posts continually cause him reputational self-harm. That's his choice. The risk is that someone is actually influenced by him, but I suspect his posts cause reductions in his credibility and therefore reduce the risk of influence. Hope so anyway.

Retirment: you choose to share the details of your purported financial position and investment/trading choices. You seem very pleased with what you claim to have achieved - good for you. Though it would be naive for you to assume that because others choose not to share their position, that they’ve achieved less than you. Your need for validation must be exhausting.

Could be a long wait.

Retirment: craving validation.

Oh dear. Retirment lost it again. I’ll leave it there.