RE: Asimwe Kabunga & Auroch Minerals26 Oct 2017 12:12
So far � pretty simple right? Auroch have acquired the potential for100% ownership of 21 prospective lithium licenses in Tanzania which are adjacent to the existing Liontown mining project which had just announced 5%+ grades of lithium.
It is clear that Kabunga controlled the unnamed Australian entity as Kabunga holdings appears in the 30th June 2016 Auroch annual report (top 20 shareholder with 950,000 shares) which is the entire consideration of shares issued to the unnamed Australian company. See page 61 of the Auroch 2016 annual report:
http://clients3.weblink.com.au/pdf/AOU/01785444.pdf
Auroch�s next step was to then do their due diligence on the licenses they were about to acquire and so they ran 1800m of trenching as well as assay tests.
On July 4th 2016 they announced that the assay results were disappointing and that there was �little scope for discovery of economic mineralisation within the Hombolo tenement package�. They then pulled out of the acquisition and withdrew the acquisition resolution from the shareholders vote.
What did it cost Auroch?
The cost to Auroch for the chance to acquire the tenements was $75,000 in cash and $95,000 in shares = $160,000 (approx. �95,000) � plus whatever costs were incurred in the trenching and assay work. Kabunga�s company had already spent $120,000 on acquiring and investigating the mining licenses (hence the demand for "The reimbursement of USD$120,000 in relation to their expenses on the mining license") so they ended up in profit by approx. $40,000 (�24,000) which, quite frankly was hardly worth the effort.
Was the cost unreasonable?
No, the mining deal was simply a deal that did not work out. It cost Auroch less than 2% of it�s $10,000,000 cash to find this out and, to me at least that seems a worthwhile punt. Not every mining or oil deal works out � there are no sinister forces at work, it�s just life.
Given the value of Kabunga�s assets in other listed companies, I think that it is pretty clear that he did not �run a scam� for 6 months of his life in an attempt to make a grand total of �24,000. He wanted the license to work, for Auroch to be worth tens or hundreds of millions and for his 12% stake in Auroch to make him millions himself. It didn�t work out and so he moved on.
What does this tell us about Kabunga�s Strategy
What is interesting though is that once the project was dead Kabunga did not hang around and keep his shares � by the time the 2017 annual report was released Kabunga Holdings was nowhere to be seen in the top 20 holders even though it�s previous stake would have been more than enough for it to still be there. Basically, this proves that Kabunga is only interested in keeping a stake in a company if he thinks that he can add something to the company.