RE: We were fully valued yesterday based on the MRE15 Oct 2025 14:44
Has anyone else noticed the increased level of posts from certain people who only this time last week were pushing for ATH and are now posting constantly about the company having almost zero prospects? Welcome to AIM, where people can do a flip 180 in a heartbeat.
I will say one thing: whilst my expectations post-MRE have not been realised, this is a reflection of market dynamics rather than anything fundamentally wrong with the company. Over the past days and weeks, many people have invested significant time and energy in sharing insights and trying to understand the RNS updates. The company’s news has been positive, SB has confirmed this, and fundamentally the project has been de-risked significantly. All indicators point to a strong and valid update.
In hindsight, some may try to use the share price outcome for clout, of course, they are free to do so, but it is, realistically, a very uneducated view of the situation. The market is the market, and while it may behave illogically at times, that does not diminish the fundamental validity of the company’s progress or the integrity of the work shared here. The same was said at 10p when we dropped to 6p, I can’t hear anyone trying to take people to task over that period of time share price performance? It doesn’t suit their narrative and therefore it won’t be brought up. Only the short term negative SP will they discuss. That’s not investing, that’s hindsight grandstanding.
Anyway…….
Hi GolferBoy,
I note with interest your assertion that the company is currently overvalued at 70p. Given the definitiveness of such a statement, it naturally implies a comprehensive and rigorous analysis underpinning your conclusion. One might reasonably expect this to include, with specific regard to Empire Metals, a detailed assessment of the Pitfield resource size, grade, TiO2 content, density, continuity, product quality, and any other material characteristics relevant to the valuation of high-grade titanium projects.
In the spirit of intellectual thoroughness, and out of a genuine concern that I may have overlooked some critical facet of your methodology, would you be so kind as to share the precise metrics, formulae, and assumptions employed in arriving at your valuation?
I, like most I’m sure would appreciate detailed figures linking these calculations to the company RNS’s as that would provide invaluable clarity not only to myself but to the wider audience interested in rigorous, evidence-based assessment.
Thanks in advance.
ML