Difference between previous finance promises versus now11 Jan 2023 16:01
It's different for some of the reasons below:
1 - Umbrella agreement - this hasn't ever been done, though not an obligatory binding agreemenr, its still a valid document. Secondly, this isn't Harry, but those institutions involved who signed between themselves willingly, we didnt have that before. They weren't even involved much bar consulting.
2 - Processes have already taken place e.g. resettling communities, ordering of contractors, banks drawing up agreements etc
3 - Security situation is much better than before. More peace agreements between govt and rebels. Also security issue was due to being close to TKGM, now nearly all security concerns are very far away from the mine.
4 - Ethiopian Govt are taking proactive measures now and even kicking Harry up the backside to get this done with licence threats as we saw previously. So he's now got fire behind him now and cannot continue to make BS promises without any consequences.
5 - No negative RNS so far which would impact the finance/umbrella agreement thus far, in fact we've had some excellent RNS's i.e. 5 new licences and resource upgrades in Saudi.
This time it is different.
In any case, history doesn't always repeat itself otherwise everyone of us would be millionaires buying shares that were historically low with the aim of having a historical rise. It doesn't always work that way.
We invest in the undeniable assets here and also in Harry to deliver it with the team he has. I'm in long term, since this is factually a potential multi million pound business where 0.7p is a monstrosity when it comes to a company being under valued.
10p minimum with all assets lined up as of currently, and about 1.4 - 2p with Tk financing IMHO.
GLA