Member Info for LWHL

I made a similar mistake on one of the previous raises here myself. More coffee mate :) GLA.

You sound like a trapped trader, rather than an investor, in CARD.

Which is fine, of course. But this one is not generally a good trader.

At some point, that might change, but just be glad that, on fundamentals, it is not a dog. As so many names are.

All being well that continues and not taking anything for granted either. GLA.

Yeah. For me, that 80p share issuance acts as a useful indicator for where the floor should be. Give or take say 10% or so.

Good volume today for not much movement. So presumably we have an iceberg seller at the moment.

I am targeting 60p or so for a slice. Then, subject to the obvious stuff, might keep my opening position here in the pipes, to see if it can push on a bit more.

While taking nothing for granted of course. Good weekend all.

Very nice intra-day reversal. The prospect of a break to the upside remains on.

lse2000! lse2000! Wherefore art thou? Lol. Good weekend all.

Enjoy and have a good weekend mate.

I wonder if it wants to fill that gap around 34p-ish?

Have set a couple of new, small buy orders dotted around that gap, in case it does.

But if we push on up instead, that would suit me just fine as well.

This could just be a tree shake. One that I suspect might be quite effective.

See what next week brings. GLA.

I reckon the markets like the latest economic data from across the Pond. And we are responding accordingly.

Fingers crossed, those gap fills we talked about earlier should fill fairly quickly next week, as long as no new geopolitical nonsense comes up over the weekend. AIMO & GLA.

I had completely forgotten about that company, until I saw the RNS this morning.

I cannot say it comes as much of a surprise, although who knows? Presumably, they will get the CLN away, as the alternative options are surely worse/non existent.

And being on AIM, you get rallies on hopium now and again, even when, as is usually the case, it all comes to nothing.

Not that I am suggesting this will be the case in that instance - I have no idea and no opinion in either direction.

But it seems that most of the holders (who are still here) are only interested in Disko.

I too remain curious about when the BOD is going to update the market on the specifics of this ongoing saga. GLA.

Must be the calm before the storm, lol.

I anticipated a bit more volatility here, but so far not much of a market, it seems.

Which is fine. The longer we remain in this tight range, the more powerful the move (up or down) IMO.

I would prefer the former, but the latter would be fine too. Just a hold and a waiting game for me personally in this name right now. GLA.

I will take your word for it, F-F, as I have not looked at the Fibs on this one that recently, lol.

The 61.8% is probably my go-to one generally, although I do plot a couple of the others as well, if I am trying to do a deep dive on a potential TA trade, in a name where I am indifferent to the fundamentals.

With these particular JD ones, I simply considered a combination of the fundamentals, on top of those gap fills that we both mentioned previously.

So pretty basic stuff for this one...but I remain confident that that alone should be enough to hit my various target prices in this particular case.

IMO, they are not particularly ambitious targets either, so fairly low risk - but of course I take nothing for granted and we shall see soon enough. GLA.

I can't wait to hear it, lol. Only joking. I can wait. GLA.

Interesting spread first thing. Looks like we could be in for a nice day here. AIMO & GLA.

I am hoping we see an early dip tomorrow, so I can add a few more.

Only about average trading volume today.

Like the other poster said earlier, this is going to break in one direction or the other. Like him, I think the probabilities are to the upside, but I have plenty of dry powder to deploy if we do somehow revisit the low 30's.

Subject to the usual caveats and just my thoughts. GLA.

Welcome aboard, Pokerchips. Not advice as such, of course, but maybe also have a look at Newmont, if you are interested in PM stocks right now. Full disclosure: I have some of that name, as well as Barrick. GLA.

I tend to look at the RSI on certain occasions, but not the MFI.

Because there are so many indicators and tools, that IMO, you can get overwhelmed if you do not limit how many you follow.

Same for the number of fibs and moving averages. But that is just my experience. Mainly through trial and error (plenty of the latter, lol).

So F-F or someone else may be better suited to answer that question. GLA.

Oh, I entirely agree. Debt is a priority, all day long.

Which in fairness they pretty much echo in the RNS today.

And as long as they keep improving business outcomes, while lowering the debt pile, then I will not be bothered either way.

I would still prefer a hybrid of BB's and a smaller dividend, rather than a larger dividend.

I just like the potential value that would be created if they can cancel a bunch of the 80p ones that they printed, for a much lower purchase price. With the added cherry on top of lower dividend payments for those shares going forward as well.

Anyway, that is for another day. Baby steps/one day at a time etc. GLA.

Maybe they can do a buy back, if all continues to look solid in April?

Might get some good value from the new shares issued at 80p last year, especially if they go ahead and reinstate a small dividend.

Great question and one I have looked into previously myself.

As I understand it, and in simple terms...mixed.

IMO, fibonacci retrace levels tend to be pretty reliable (although not perfect!). Fibs are a component of EW theory - but they are not one and the same thing.

I think F-F does a deeper dive than I do when it comes to this sort of stuff and I am a long way off feeling remotely qualified to speak with confidence on TA.

But I hope this helps you a little. As part of wider research, I really do think TA has a valuable role to play. In trading especially. Naturally though, not advice and DYOR etc. GLA.

I think so. No idea what the SP could reach if they continue to turn things around here, but short term, and at the risk of sounding like I am trying to ramp, it feels like it wants to break out.

That is my take on the chart today, but just my thoughts and I could be wrong. GLA.

I would like to see some meaty inside buys in the next couple of days.

Nothing speaks louder than the sound of BOD wallets being opened, to back up the confident words.

Either way, I have revisited some of the financials and the fundamentals here this morning.

And have added a few more. GLA.