Member Info for LWHL

Not out of the woods yet, but I am inclined to agree with your conclusion.

We filled a little gap on the way up this morning. See if we can fill the bigger gap that some of us cited before and then take it from there.

Some important economic data coming up later today and tomorrow that could drive the wider markets up or down. GLA.

Nor have I, but there will be workarounds. There (almost) always are.

Usually to the detriment of the employees, but that is socialism for you. GLA.

Officially, no. But it would be a logical conclusion to draw that he must be more confident in the future direction of travel now, than he was at the time of the last raise, for example.

As I said earlier, this offers no certainties, but it is clearly a bullish signal, IMO anyway. GLA.

Nice tree shake first thing. Did not add further myself, but glad I did not have stops in place either.

The chart on the 4-hourly looks good IMO. 420p for a slice, then 450p-ish for a total exit from the traders. If all goes to plan anyway! GLA.

I actually take more interest when a CFO buys from his own pocket, than other BOD members.

They tend to be extremely risk-averse (perhaps why this one, as you say, did not buy at 8p or lower).

No guarantees in itself of course, but it is difficult not to be very pleased with this purchase. GLA.

Just trading sideways. More or less. CPI and PPI data from across the Pond later this week, as well as some key European information. Which will likely influence the indices one way or the other in the coming weeks.

IMO, the chart does not look terrible, but it is curling down, so a return to the high 80's on no company-specific news, would not surprise me.

I do not think we are seeing manipulation here. Unlike some of the jobs data and other economic indicators, lol. GLA.

Got a partial fill earlier when we hit the low 370's. GLA.

Fair points and I do not necessarily disagree - but it was also not to be sniffed at, IMO.

Still a lot of work to do, no doubt, but I think the current SP reflects much, if not all, of that current negative sentiment. We shall see. GLA.

Drain the swamp.

IMO, it is simply a sign that the company has not yet regained sufficient market faith.

The debt reduction was the first step. I think if we get confirmation of a new BB programme and/or dividends, then this will be the biggest catalyst for a material move higher.

Although prior to then, I still think we are going to see a range with the upper level being at least mid 40's. Purely speculation on my part of course, and we will see soon enough. GLA.

Thanks mate. It really does make up too much of my p/f right now.

So much so, that the overall p/f number is positively swollen. Which is delightful of course, but obviously has had an equally notable impact in the other direction in the recent past. Poor risk management. Which I am gradually remedying.

Luckily, my trading elsewhere in the past 12 months or so (and at the time of print anyway, lol) has been sufficiently fruitful, so as to cushion the effects of this overweight position.

Even so, if we can continue the run up to 870p - 890p-ish, then I will reduce further and to a position size that I will feel more comfortable simply letting run, should this be the price discovery period for the metals.

And if it is not, then I will likely buy some back cheaper, lower the average and manage the position accordingly. And more sensibly this time :)

New ATH print for gold. Silver looking solid too. PM's are overbought now, IMO, but only insofar as from a technical basis and only on a short term basis as well, to my mind. See what the rest of the week brings. GLA.

Pokerchips: you are far too generous and IMO you miss the bigger picture.

We never needed to get ourselves into this state of indebtedness - indeed it is, and was, an act of national betrayal, to do so.

They have never listened to the people on the big issues, so I reject the premise that only now are they going to have to essentially ignore what the people want.

They were quite happy to destroy the currency when it suited their purposes and will continue to do so when they want to.

They have always done exactly what they want. Exclusively for their own purposes, and always to the detriment of the masses.

We are not where we are through a series of accidents. Give me control of a nation's money supply, and I care not who makes its laws.

Anyway, back on topic: reasonable day here and IMO the chart looks OK. Some important economic data coming up this week, so see what that throws up. GLA.

And that is why I trimmed today. And let some go the last time we had the then year high print, which failed to kick on.

My sale today was therefore smaller than originally planned, due to the above action, but against the instinct to hold longer.

With this name, you have to be careful.

Is this time different and the stars finally aligning? Been here too long to believe it, lol, but certainly have enough in the tank to benefit, if indeed it finally is. GLA.

I let a few go at 808. Only a few hundred shares, which represents a very small trim for me here.

Still massively overweight, but willing to sit tight until the next planned trim price.

Without taking anything for granted, naturally. GLA.

802p to buy now. Come on my son! Lol.

I do not think there is a consensus of opinion as to the time frame for any chart pattern playing out. At least none I am aware of.

They do not always play out, to be clear, and as I said earlier, I am less convinced of their credibility when it comes to AIM.

But I really do think that TA, as part of wider research and fundamentals (when applicable) improves one's success rate when it comes to stock market returns. That has certainly been my anecdotal experience anyway.

Hopefully it plays out here. I think my first target price, when I made my maiden purchase here a few years ago, was 24p.

But it is unwise to look too far ahead, nor count imagined, let alone unrealised, gains in any name.

So for me, it is a case of sitting back and watching how this unfolds in 2025. Then I will take another view. Needless to say of course, subject to the obvious caveats. GLA.

If you take 11.80 as the top of the cup's right side and 4.40 as the bottom of the cup, subtract them and you have 7.4p. Then add this number to 11.80p = completion of said pattern. In that ball park anyway.

Happy to be challenged on the maths by better technicians who plotted it less casually than I did (which is probably most on here, lol). GLA.

There is a pretty clear gap on my broker account chart. Either way, we have still not retraced to it (assuming I am not wrong about that, which is always a possibility with my TA skills, lol). And may never do. My buy orders have not triggered, but I am not adding at this price either. We remain above the 50 DMA, but unless we get a break above the 200, then IMO we are kind of in no mans land for now. Which is fine. Sooner or later, this will move, in one direction or the other. It is rarely calm for long.

I am plumping for upwards, but I am patient and not subject to margin, so easier to be patient. GLA.

I have been doing some charting. IMO, we have comfortably broken out of the downward channel now.

Even if we retraced back to the mid 9's, we would still be in positive territory, from a TA perspective.

Not that I am convinced TA works on AIM stocks, or that my own TA skills are good enough to pin my hat to :)

If this does play out though, then so might the cup and handle formation that I reckon I can see on the same chart.

Needless to say, if we reach a SP that validates either of the above, I will proclaim the virtues of TA.

If neither does...this post will self destruct... GLA.

Call Stalicla directly (assuming they have a contact number) and ask them I would say.