Member Info for LWHL

Yeah, I would expect so too, but not long to find out.

We have not even had much chatter here yet. I guess we probably need to have a big day on the leaders board to achieve that.

Not that I care about that, but just an observation from experience in the nano cap space and observing these various chat boards over a few years etc.

I might go against my own plan and add a few more, even if it is above my target price.

Still not load the boat territory yet, IMO, but I want to have a bit more exposure here than I currently do.

Loving the pace at which they are moving the business along.

Has anyone seen Roger of late? Lol :) GLA.

The answer to all three, JMAX, is 'yes'.

But it is the 'stable coins' that concern me the most.

Straight out of 1984, if you think about it.

A statement that I hope would not fall foul of the online safety act, or risk being a non-crime incident, or whatever the latest flavour or wording of censorship it might be today. It really is quite challenging keeping up to date with what is wrong speak....

And so you did, Montyfino. That was a splendid profit - nobody went hungry taking one etc.

The market always provides opportunities. At the moment, this is being chiefly found within the PM space and a few other mining stocks.

Having been in this one since before you were, believe me, this is a welcome relief, but it is never wise to take anything for granted with stocks. Especially the miners. So I am not :) GLA.

If we can close above the downward channel that we have been in for quite a long time, then that would potentially signal the start of a break out.

But see where we close tomorrow, I would suggest. GLA.

No need for a CBDC to provide stability to the bond market. Any bond market - not just the UK one.

How can anyone not see the 'stablecoin' for what it really is? Or what it will lead to, if they manage to get it up and running? Sigh.

I was not in the markets during that period, but I have read and heard a lot about it.

IMO, the risk to miners is the likely increase in labour costs and taxation, as this stagflation, or at the very least, extremely challenging macro stuff, continues to play out.

Strikes, increased risk of asset theft. Even potentially from bankrupt nation states, rather than 'just' organised crime taking a taste.

Look to Mali as the most recent example. Or something similar to what happened with POLY. Which is perhaps virtually the same thing, as far as risk or cost for small shareholders goes.

Which is why I was happy to take slices along the way here, because it can happen anywhere.

Anyway, whatever happens, I am not going to join those who might chase the miners, a la Dot Com era, or many other frenzies. But to each their own.

That is exactly the way to play stocks, IMO. Especially the tiddlers.

I have taken profits far too early on several occasions, but that is preferable to watching life-changing paper sums evaporate, such as the many examples we can all think of that have happened in the past. And will happen again in the future as well.

Position size really is vital, regardless. Especially with the tiddlers.

Anyway, as long as one never views these types as serious investments, until they prove worthy of the title, then hopefully the journey is at least pleasant, and never worse than a blip on the road of financial security :)

Still some overhang, based on some dummy buys I just did.

But not currently sellers that are willing to let any go at the bottom of the current channel either, so I am not yet getting a fill either.

I would just take some now, if I did not already have a small stake here. But I do, so I am going to wait until they let the price drop a bit.

Hopefully get them shifted sooner that way too. GLA.

I thought the profit taking would have already happened, long before now.

I am also fairly staggered that we have not had a TR-1 notification for goodness knows how long now either.

The size of some of the buys and sells in the past couple of months (even weeks), cannot IMO be PI activity alone.

I am now past the target that I initially had for my theoretical final sale here. I have increased it further now. Not usually a strategy that works well for me, but in this case, well into hefty free carry territory, it is less of a gamble. AIMO naturally. GLA.

Hit the RNS tab mate. Worth reading them all, and then take a view for yourself. GLA.

And yet, for all the posturing, the new administration never, ever, seems to go after the corruption that went before them.

Funny that. It is all political theatre, and they are basically all in it together. With parliamentary rules that so often seem to give them huge amounts of leeway to make or save a lot of money, by doing things that are not necessarily illegal, but outside of the 'spirit' of the rules. But would almost always be illegal in the real world of business. Lol.

The manifesto's are not worth the paper they are written on. Many (most?) of the big (and usually expensive) initiatives that they lock us into, are essentially dictates that get passed on down via supranational organisations that nobody voted for, or had the chance to elect whatsoever.

Anyway, I have set a small buy order here and if it hits, I look forward to joining you all as a fellow shareholder. GLA.

I was referring more to the MSM, but I take your point.

That said, DT wants rate cuts, so he hardly took that decision due to being a purist, when it comes to statistical process and data collection :)

Same for all the fun and games that seems to be going on at the FED right now. Personnel changes etc. We can only speculate on why he might want that to happen...

Ultimately, they all want to inflate this enormous debt away. And for all his many faults, he is considerably less of a liability to his country than KS is to ours.

I think they all underestimate the threat of stagflation, to be honest, and term limits perhaps mean they do not care either way.

Meanwhile, the miners march on and paper profits swelling, although I would happily swap that for better times. Hopefully they are not too far off... GLA.

Yeah. It's kind of amazing how significantly altered they are (pretty much always downwards, lol) without any serious criticism being brought against them.

Either the model is flawed, or they are blatantly manipulating the data, but in any other walk of life, you simply could not get away with such wild inaccuracy.

Jesus. I see what you mean :)

Massive resistance around mid 22's on the chart, as far as I can see, but then again, it sailed through a few other theoretically big resistance levels in the recent past, so who knows?

I will not be feeling particularly celebratory if we smash through that level, because of what it will probably mean for the macro economic and political landscape.

Hey ho. GLA.

She better be quick, or Angela might snap it up, along with all the other properties in that road :)

Because that would involve far too many variables.

But I would expect that they have already done a lot of work in the background on this potential threat, including running the numbers across many different potential scenarios.

Anyway, we could be in for some highly volatile weeks, which could in itself offer up some amazing opportunities and discounts.

See where we are at the end of the month, let alone the Autumn Budget.... GLA.

Indeed. Hopefully everything continues to tank, if it leads to this administration collapsing before the autumn.

Let a patriot have a happy thought :) In all seriousness though, if we can clear out these clowns and bring in some people of economic intelligence and courage, then in a relatively short period of time, I believe we can enjoy good times in the UK once again.

But before then, and a bit like with the Olympics, as long as we beat France, then that will offer some comfort in the short term.

In this case, them needing a bail out first.

Goodness me, socialism really is the stupid man's drink! GLA.

I presume sector-wide. JD, ASOS and CARD also down, as of a couple of minutes ago in live trading.

I think the 220's will see some buying appetite. I will add a few at that point anyway, but not above that range. GLA.

The CEO needs to prove he has been earning his corn - and that this is a credible business.

Really looking forward to the update, so I can either dump this (if it is the total dog it looks like being), or potentially add more, if by some miracle it is not one of 'those' types of tiddlers.