Member Info for LWHL

Quite incredible how scrambled the brains of our people have become, to have ever allowed our country to get to this stage in the first place.

But the current experiment is hopefully coming to an end. The Overton Window hopefully only at the beginning of a shift back to common sense.

Which, all being well, will see this type of behaviour dealt with appropriately again, sooner rather than later.

Once that happens, IMO, it will not take long, nor too many cautionary examples required, for a positive transformation to replace the current living experience in the West.

In the meantime, even allowing for the current backwardness of criminal management, this name is good value at this price. IMO naturally. GLA.

IMO. Tempted to raise my buy order so it gets filled now...then it will be a dead cert to drop to 20 at least :) GLA.

29th, according to the last RNS. Fingers crossed and GLA....

No, it is not. Furthermore, are you trying to dump placing shares in that name? Even with that May raise, how long is their current cash runway? Based on what usually happens with that type of outfit, I would be wary.

I never mind when someone mentions another name on a chat board, except in circumstances like this. But to each their own. GLA.

Should have said 'likely' rather than definitely would add more around 280p, because I am still somewhat miffed/displeased with the lack of inside buying after the last update. I would have added more before now had they done otherwise.

Anyway, see where we are in the weeks ahead. GLA.

The pension deficit stopped me from taking a position in RNO several years ago.

Not the first multibagger that I have missed and no doubt, will not be the last either.

Subject to the obvious stuff, I too will be adding here, in and around 280p, if it comes to pass.

Although I am yet to be convinced by those posters who think this is a 10 quid plus stock. Feels like anchor bias to me. But 5 quid or so? IMO absolutely feasible, and any more than that would be splendid.

Indeed. Bit like taking tips from the M Fool, IMO. Probably going to lose more than you win, some might believe. Although the inverse Cramer ETF did close down recently. But not because the inverse failed, so I understand.

Anyway, anything that you see or read in the media, is almost certainly going to have already been priced into the markets, give or take.

And it also depends on your own time horizon. A genuine LTH with a 10-plus year radius? Probably inconsequential. 20 plus years? Almost certainly inconsequential. And if it is not? Then your portfolio is the least of your worries :) Good weekend all.

IMO, he does not need to grow it by much, to ensure a healthy upside to the SP from here. As long as debt continues to fall at the same time.

In the meantime, as I mentioned before, a nice little dividend to keep us sweet for our patience, and some nice mini trading range opportunities of late as well. Good weekend all.

I hope so. I took a similar small flutter in that one a little while back, as I liked the chart, although it has not played out yet. And might not, of course.

Like this one, using cash that can be lost entirely, without being more than an irritation at having been wrong, should that scenario come to pass.

Yes. Did not post at the time, as it was one of several small positions that I took, or added to on the day....and I forgot to declare my hand, lol.

Only a very small position at the moment (around £2K, since you asked, lol); I still am underwhelmed with the last update and still not sure about the BB in the circumstances, but IDK, I just feel like it is worth having a few at the moment.

Not a sound basis for investment, I appreciate, and time will tell. Certainly not advice to follow suit etc.

I will give it until the next update at least and take a view then I think.

Or a run up to 4 quid on fresh air, and I will probably take the small profits and sit on the sidelines again.

The former is IMO more likely than the latter, but comfortable either way when it comes to a book mark holding such as this. GLA.

Taken a small punt with some profits from elsewhere. Multibag or bust kind of thing, IMO. GLA.

Did he get much support in the end?

FWIW, had I still been a holder at that time, I probably would have done so - but I lost my faith a long time before he perhaps did.

Anyway, at least holders will only see further dilution from this deal on those warrants if the strike price is met. Just for the sake of balance. GLA.

Happy with that update, personally. Need to review the fundamentals now, based on the new 'known knowns', but if we get a sell the news opportunity, I will likely add back a few. GLA.

Seems a bit generous to the new investor IMO, and a kick in the teeth to LTH's, to my mind.

But I can see the bull thesis attached to this news at the same time, while IMO adding strength to one of my previous comments here, along the lines of LTH's not being rewarded, even if the company does eventually deliver. GLA anyway.

I would not just let them get away with essentially ignoring you. Keep 'pestering them' to clarify this. Preferably in an RNS, if not directly to you alone.

But, say they do indeed have 2 mill in the bank now. What will that new cash go towards?

Hopefully at the very least, it will mean no further raises for shareholders to eat, while they wait for something accretive to take place.

IMO, market faith in this name and this BOD is so low that it will take a lot more than confirmation of even this, to re-rate. Where otherwise, it almost certainly would, given the market cap versus said cash windfall. But time will tell. GLA.

CC - I do not get it either, but in fairness, I did not put much time into analysing it, as I would have, had I been a holder either here, or MET1.

But, if it is a quandary to both you and Rach, then it appears unlikely that it is simply brain fade on my part.

In your shoes, I would contact 80M directly to achieve clarification. As I have said before, it is your company. The BOD works for you, so it would not be an imposition for you to ask them about this. GLA.

Lol. I hear you. On this occasion, I did so, but had the results been stronger, or the markets simply more bullish on the day, then it might well have been a 2% or 3% down day only.

Had there not been a fairly strong run up into results, I would have held myself - but I get loads of calls wrong, so not blowing my own trumpet.

I thought a retest of the 50 DMA would happen today. Did not mention it pre-market, for obvious reasons.

FWIW, that would also be in the range where I would take a few back here. Then add in tranches on the way down again, if it happened.

Which it might not, in which case, and as always, I hope you current holders make a bundle. GLA.

Buy backs finally starting to have some positive impact, perhaps?

A long way to go before I start thinking about slicing some here personally. Subject to the obvious, naturally. GLA.

Part of the same family as anchoring IMO. Can be very useful for accumulation of a stock, when you get heavy selling into prices that represent break even for a lot of historic trapped traders.

Not sure if that will apply to this one, although if/when we revisit mid 22's, we might find out.

I think 25's at the time of print, would leave some on the table for the next man, but late 20's to 30 would IMO be quite frothy. Taking everything into consideration. Certainly within 12 months of now, on the basis of the macro stuff.

But time will tell and I might leave some to run, although the bulk are for my aforementioned target price. GLA.

The silver chart is pretty exciting right now, IMO. So, if gold and silver continue their current uptrends, then I think 12's fairly soon would not be a surprise.

Getting a bit pricey on fundamentals now though, so we need the spot prices to remain elevated. GLA.