RE: Sum of the parts now worth more than the whole10 Dec 2021 08:35
IMO You value Cobre to highly. It is a 12-month rolling contract and can only be valued within contract. Will we ever get the millions we have sunk into LCCM back? It currently fails to meet the definition of asset, but should become so if it is ever available to meet debts, commitments or legacies. Redmoor, is still undefined. The geological team has bailed, but the BoD do not think it is necessary for us to find out from them, they would rather we just got our information from outside sources. The current NAV is nowhere near the 1.2p (£24m) you are stating. I would say Cobre is £2m + and Redmoor has the rest. We have changed from a progressive growing company into a “one last roll of the dice” desperate gambler. Everything hinges on the loan facility. Having blown (for whatever reason) any chance of a JV, failed to produce when we had permissions and a buyer, been caught up in a scam, had Due Diligence which now seems questionable, etc, etc. We have asked for a minimum $10m usd (£7.75m) loan facility. This was (if I remember correctly), finance was to get LCCM up and running and fund Redmoor’s progression. It is now for meeting the PEPR conditions and getting LCCM running. What it is now saying is that we need £7.62m to get LCCM producing to a financially viable level.
If we get the finance we get to forge forward and hopefully produce at LCCM and should look forward to a massive rerate. Failing to secure the finance would leave very few options, one of which would mean a progressive raise of 3bn shares (1.5x current issue). But we would still have the same BoD who have presided over a collapse of shareholder value due to questionable decisions, a lack of culpability, terrible information flow and have shown glaring gaps in competency.