Philosophical investing31 Jul 2025 09:33
I suppose this could be called an abstract post, but still very relevant on facts and rationale of the market and investing today.
Buying shares could be classified in 2 categories, mid/long term investing and trading.
Investing implies holding shares, averaging down or up, regular small purchase for the long terms and dividends collection.
The facts of the matter with investing are fundamentals, the market or a specific commodity and the way the company is run by the BoD.
Trading on the other hand is to do with technicals, graphs, price action, tools analyse etc...
In my experiences though, I have notices (often at my expenses) that there is another category, another way of buying shares.
This third category is the most damaging and expensive. It is the one that sits in between the first and the second, the one that switch between investing and trading.......
For me the most difficult thing to do when investing/trading is to stick to my original plans, when often news flows, personal circumstances and some time just out right the way I worked up in the morning, make me change my mind or create doubts or the opposite, excitements, driven by news of the last moments.
Indeed the only time I made a fantastic return on investments, albeit taking high calculated risks and possibly been very lucky to bet at the right time of a particular market, has been during covid, when I follower a system and invested on Pharmaceuticals....(no brainer there I suppose).
What I am trying to say is that, doesn't matter what, often if one sticks to a plan a system, in due time is likely that will make decent returns.
Beside philosophy, I was following an interesting debate on what kind of energy will fuel the data center of future AI development.
All the up an coming kind of energy supply, from nuclear to renewable and more have massive restrains for the immediate future.
For example nuclear with its up and coming Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), apparently is at least 5 years away from development,
and imo even then, initial estimated costs will have ballooned, without talking about the practicality, legislation and public opinion consultation.
Inthe end it turns out to be again gas, the cheaper, easier, relatively environmental friendly and more readily available for of energy to produce the electricity needed to fuel the AI revolution....I am not sure about coal, but fortunately seems nobody is talking about it.
So stick to your plans, a sp wont go up just because you wish/it should/ go up. The only thing that we can't predict is timing.