Member Info for LovableLumax

Next update surely imminent and will detail P1b regimens and confirm dosing has started.

Creepy I know you're not the brightest but see below re my view on your LAME LinkedIn posts -

Massive ramping while quietly selling and then announces the fact he's sold due to some lame reason or another and the share price sinks lower still and he buys back in and back on the rampathon. Self-serving with no self-awareness!

I'm chuckling. Self-serving, me, perhaps but I have been consistent for the last 12 months or more. You've pumped to high heaven and then dumped. Massive ramping while quietly selling and then announces the fact he's sold due to some lame reason or another and the share price sinks lower still and he buys back in and back on the rampathon. Self-serving with no self-awareness!

Creepy James as bad as LOTM for lack of self-awareness. I was cautioning buying when a raise was nailed on while the creep and LOTM were ramping crazily as the morons either didn't know the audit needed cash to be signed off or they knew and sold into the rise (handy for me taking a short out while they pumped the share price). As it happens since I called the raise and issues the share price has dropped like a stone from 2.5p to 0.25p. All the while the creep has pumped and dumped twice so completely disingenuous. To be fair the creep dumped last time due to a LinkedIn engagement from somebody who was trying to find buyers for mirriad. The creep did okay, sold at double the current share price so bought back and kept a fair bit of change. A good move. Well I don't think buying back was but at least he's made some cash. LOTM however keeps catching the falling knife.

Logically, most of what I predicted has come to pass. Most of the nonsense you've posted has been shown to be meaningless. Of course we don't know what the financials will look like but what one can do is look at the house broker guidance. Also one has to bear in mind Mirriad has never achieved financial guidance but even if it did and hit £2.5m FY it will still have less cash at YE than last year and given there is a lack of visibility on forward orders they will need a cash injection to have their accounts signed off on a going concern basis. That seems logical to me. Whether the truth is venomous or not, a dose of reality always helps to keep one on firm footing.

Do you think brands work exclusively with Mirriad or they are able to sign deals during or even before production?

I can't account for them not adhering to the regs so if that's the case they could have multiple deals in excess of £180k this year but their guidance strongly says otherwise. As far as spitting venom do you mean me calling a raise, saying share price would fall and break even not in sight? Would you prefer me to ramp without substance.

Please answer -

With less cash at YE and a historically slow H1 what do you think will be needed to get the accounts signed off?

Also, with all the Yellowstone PP do you really think they would go through the hassle of sorting it post production or do you think they'd do the same as always and sort before and during production and the partners would know what other brands will feature before agreeing?

The NOMAD should ensure Mirriad adheres to AIM regs. So if there was a deal in excess of 10% of prior year they should have issued an RNS. I suspect they did?

That said, if Mirriad was doing well and had a robust pipeline the guidance wouldn't be so pathetic and the constant trying to save a few more grand cost cutting wouldn't be necessary.

With less cash at YE and a historically slow H1 what do you think will be needed to get the accounts signed off?

Also, with all the Yellowstone PP do you really think they would go through the hassle of sorting it post production or do you think they'd do the same as always and sort before and during production and the partners would know what other brands will feature before agreeing?

I assume you mean vain? I'd be surprised if I am the first to think you look like a creep.

The NOMAD should ensure Mirriad adheres to AIM regs. That said, if Mirriad was doing well and had a robust pipeline the guidance wouldn't be so pathetic and the constant trying to save a few more grand cost cutting wouldn't be necessary.

With less cash at YE and a historically slow H1 what do you think will be needed to get the accounts signed off?

Medusa? Rather odd. One thing is for sure when I started posting negatively here (realistically rather than de-ramping without substance) perhaps I was Medusa-like and turned the share price to stone as it dropped like one. From 2.5p+ and now it’s 1/10th of that.

Again, whilst you have pumped and dumped twice you're now back in pumping so I guess we'll get more ludicrous LinkedIn nonsense. You want me to post the rubbish during the last pump and dump on invoice financing and Samsung money?

I call you creepy James as you look like a deviant, a creep.

As far as 'coercing' TBTT I did no such thing although it's interesting his take on permissions being a major issue was brought up 18 months before mirriad ever mentioned.

Again, if mirriad was the next big thing why hasn't a media co bought it when it was distressed last year and up for sale? Raised in 2023 at 3p, this year at 1.25p and less cash at June this year than last, guided to have less cash at year end and guided to lose £4m next year. If they have enough support to get a raise away What do you think the next price will be and how many billions of shares? Unless there are some super RNSs in the coming weeks they'll be no pump so no short from me.

apple (and many others) is famed for innovation but when smaller cos develop and protect ip of value they haven’t done they acquire. mirriad has been plodding along for years all the while under the radar as its revenues have been. mirriad has provided £500k for a ceo who should be on £100k but has done **** all else especially not even when up for sale for **** all being an attractive punt. that said i suspect creepy james has a better view than all the execs and innovators at apple, amazon and elsewhere.

April 2023 and in mind the co raised soon after at 3p valuing it at £15m. Apple could have bought the lot for a few hours profit but don’t silly creepy James knows better.

- the board of the Company has concluded that there is no prospect that an offer for the issued and to be issued share capital of the Company will be forthcoming by early April and has accordingly decided to terminate the formal sale process under the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the "Takeover Code"). The Company is not in discussions with any party in relation to a sale and is not in receipt of any approaches. Accordingly, the Company is no longer in an offer period and the requirement to make disclosures under Rule 8 of the Takeover Code has now ceased.

Further to the Company's announcement on 20 January 2023, in which it detailed that the Company has sufficient cash to fund operations until the third quarter of 2023, Mirriad advises that its cash position as at 31 March 2023 was GBP7.52m. Consequently, the Board continues to assess all of its strategic options, including seeking additional funding. If further funding cannot be raised, the Board will consider all options and will take the appropriate steps to preserve value for key stakeholders. There can be no certainty that the terms of any investment received will be suitable.

The Board will continue to update the market further as appropriate.

STS very hard to treat and dox isn’t hugely effective but it’s the most effective which is why it’s standard of care. A low bar to beat. Data in a safety phase suggests AVA6000 will be safer (fewer side effects) and more effective (efficacious).

i am a liar as i’m posting unprompted. 2phevs who if you e seen his linkedin profile is creepy james and a serial pumper and then dumper. the creep is back in and slow as normal.

if mirriad had a moat and vpp worth lots of money apple would have bought mirriad when it put itself up for sale last year. mirriad had no offers whether from apple, amazon or channel 4 offering £50m which would have been taken. apple makes around £80bn in profit a year. i suspect if vpp and mirriad had a moat it might be able to have bought mirriad when up for sale last year rather than waiting a year when revenue has dropped and no timetable for programmatic. funny as.

if there was a big vpp market the majors would be all over it and if mirriad’s ip prevented them from developing their own they’d have bought it for **** all by now.

Stroma breakdown the key to TNBC.

https://x.com/blueberrymgmnt/status/1858172123400855640?s=46

I don’t believe there is an Avacta DX per se. There are 2 companies that are part of Avacta and have their own staff and are up for sale.

That’s FY revenue. I’m trying not to post but will reply to posts directed at me. If they had a contract expected to be worth £180k they would have to issue an RNS. It would be something like - we have signed a VPP deal with X and although we do not yet know the full revenue contribution we expect it to generate in excess of £180k in 12 months. Something like Yellowstone would surely generate a fair whack more than that even if mirriad only got 20% of total value.

BTW caught out again? All of your fanciful posts have meant less revenue, lower raise prices, massive dilution and you were apologising for pumping as cost people money. You have as much credibility as self-awareness. I’m the one who said I had a short one before the last raise (helped by your ramping) to mitigate large losses. Just google Yellowstone product placement. Also mirriad would have featured on its showreel. Absolute numpties.

LOTM you need to look up AiM regs. Any deals expected to generate 10% of the prior year’s revenue has to be subject to an RNS. I won’t carry on posting as little use but you guys haven’t learnt a thing. I mean creepy James has pumped this and dumped twice and now he’s back in as posting LinkedIn guff incessantly. It’s pitiful. You have to ask why H1 revenue was merely £390k, why demand side fell, only 1 strategic partner from 4, why didn’t Disney extend its 2 year trial (they were a strategic partner), why did Tripelift walk away, why have the broker guided £4m loss next year and what that means for audit sign off and a raise. I’ll leave you to it but will await the next RNSs.

Guys, Yellowstone has been one of the most successful series for product placement and the deals were agreed before and during production with all stakeholders. Coors, wrangler, bourbon, Bentley and many, many more did very well and the next season will see more of the same. Do you really think they will suddenly decide to change and sort it post production and use VPP with all the complexities and hassle that entails? Your logic is bizarre. As for all these LinkedIn ‘likes’ all it does is illustrate you’ve not used LinkedIn in a professional capacity. Media very incestuous as most industries are. Your haven’t learnt from drawing conclusions from a debt finance guy living a post of Stephan’s and many more. If mirriad was appointed for Yellowstone it would be worth more than £180k so would be material and subject to an RNS. You’re either really stupid or pumping.