Member Info for LONGWAIT

I disagree with Shpunen.

I've viewed the Gherkin event and another recording and I don't think the ramping was reasonable.

Watching the presentation on Badile now makes embarrassing viewing.

I think you've done well overall, Royban.

I'm losing 80 percent.

YW, Lucero, but you're right about Malcy not using the word ' immediately' or anything similar.

He didn't specify short-term, medium term or long term.

The fact that some people think $2 or more could be the takeover price and that Malcy thought more than 50 p likely suggests to me that the shares are very undervalued, but AIM is a mystery.

Mrshareman:

What will you say if some time next year, oil is back up at $80 on supply shortages, Iran crisis and new Hezbollah - Israel War, and investors/speculators are piling into oil stocks?

"If this comes in - to remove the moratorium now - the shares would go up by a factor of ten I'm sure - it's that big - maybe more."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvLqf2L-hMI

(3:58 - 4:08)

In fairness to Malcy, the share price at that time was only 5.25 p, so he meant a rise to 52.5 p.

Still, that would be a lot better than now.

I wonder at what price...

I agree, Colonel.

The old fears that the US oil industry will not be sustainable will return if oil falls far enough.

The oil market behaves like a manic depressive.

I agree, Colonel.

The old fears that the US Lil industry will not be sustainable will return if oil falls far enough.

The oil market behaves like a manic depressive.

When Malcy was interviewed a while ago, before the moratorium was lifted, he said he thought the share price would immediately rise tenfold on its being lifted.

I guess that would mean about 200 p.

Instead, it has halved from its high of about 28 p.

People were talking of permanently low oil prices when they fell to about $26, but that didn't stop Brent climbing to $86.

If they are permanently low, they have a funny way of showing it.

I agree with you, JTinv, that JOG is a screaming buy, but don't understand what you mean when you say you think there is no downside.

I have been buying at 10 p intervals: 190, 180, 170.

I intended to buy at 160, but decided there was no hurry this morning and that it could go lower.

I come home and find it's on it's way to 150.

That's downside.

I agree with you that these are bargain prices for HUR and PMO.

I bought a ridiculously modest number of shares in PMO for 54 p and, after 146 p, thought we would never see that price again, but now I wonder.

Her spoken English is outstanding, NW.

You can see where the southern English accent comes from.

It seems that whenever a share price collapses, its company's BOD are accused of being liars!

What will they do for cash in late 2019?

I hope it works.

For a moment, as I was reading your post, I thought they wrote that hot water was all they had found in Dunquin South.

Sorry, Double, but I think by being brief I caused a misunderstanding.

What I meant is that the devaluation of sterling could make HUR more attractive to a foreign bidder.

It can't harm HUR's profits in sterling, either.

You point out, Wulpert, that overseas investors must take into consideration the fact that HUR shares are denominated in sterling.

I would have thought that is to their advantage.

Yes, Biffa.

I'm all in favor of people using electric bikes (I hear they have made Beijing both cleaner and quieter), electric cars, and electric buses.

Can't quite see them getting round to making electric aeroplanes, though.

That's more like what I was thinking.\

What is GSA?

The updated seismic figures?