Member Info for LONGWAIT

Remember Messrs Botham and Willis in 1981, Crude?

That's why I try to discipline myself to average down, Craig!

Let's face it, Jack: all we SOU LTHs are already proven half-wits ...

£30 per bottle??

How much is that in terms of spam fritters?

Very funny, JTF, but you are in fact on Jobbs' filter list, even if he does have a schoolgirl crush on you.

When you read (regularly) in the papers of someone having had to consult 10-20 doctors before getting the right diagnosis, let alone the right treatment, you realise that the medical profession's diagnostic skills are way-overrated.

Thousands of people with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome or Fibromyalgia were dismissed as malingerers or nutcases by doctors who were obviously in the wrong profession.

Scientific research has proven that both diseases exist and that they have effects on multiple systems in the body which aren't even going to show up in a scan, let alone a cursory examination by a doctor who lacks respect for his patients.

Not wishing to pry, but are you saying your other five investments fared WORSE than SOU, Jinx?

I agree, WL: I don't buy the conspiracy theory that those posters are trying to get the price down any more than I buy their conspiracy theory that the management have been pretending to believe there is value in Tendrara.

As to why they won't go away - well, I suppose people don't easily let go of obsessions (with no disrespect intended to people who are afflicted by obsessive-compulsive disorders) but it may be that they want validation of their ideas by seeing us throw in the towel.

Some time during the next few months, we should find out who has been right.

I think I have belatedly got your point, Maldini.

By 'interest from people who are not invested in SOU,' you are referring to the ten-plus companies who have shown interest.

' the interest from people who are not invested in SOU is validation that the market sees value in SOU ...'
I didn't get that.
I think SOU is absurdly-undervalued.
That is, of course, a result of the price having collapsed!
It's just a sad fact of life on LSE AIM that many posters target companies and their managements when the price has collapsed and completely neglect the issue of value.
I still can hardly believe that I've read so many posts claiming that Tendrara hasn't got any commercial gas.
It's almost as though the posters don't want any to be found.

'"=> EPS production data will be used to appraisal extent of Lancaster field... Further 'experimentation' = 'out' trigger, post WD."'
(with single quotation marks added by me, in order to cause even more confusion)

I too request clarification, as I am worried that it could be a coded message from Trigger SD, warning of a new calamity.

Never say never, Cebo.

A poster on another company says he invested in a company and its share price increased by more than a hundredfold.
I told him most people wouldn't hold on for such massive gains.

Reply of the day, Double!

One day, it will be trying very hard to go to 430p.

(Ramp of the Day).

Grammatical howler of the day: 'I could probably buy Greenland instead of Donald Trump.'

NO-ONE could buy Donald Trump!

I'm interested in your Woodside investment story.
I don't know what the exchange rate was, but it seems your investment increased in value by more than 100 times.
I doubt whether many people here on LSE would allow a profit to run that far.

I agree, Lawrence, but most people prefer to pay 80p when there is euphoria than 8p when there is depression.

That's how people always have been and always will be and that is why prices move from one extreme to another.

Yes - I saw it belatedly and was disgusted by it too.

I am sure Rothschild and the ten plus suitors are taking it into account.

Net debt could be as low as $1.6 bn by the end of this year.

Either we will receive a reasonable offer or we won't.
It's standard form on LSE for many posters to predict a negative outcome.
If they are right, they will be crowing and we'll be told, 'You see, TW was right,' ' I told your so!' etc.
If a reasonable offer is received, either they will all disappear and TW will never be mentioned again, or they will say that it's not a reasonable offer and it's derisory compared to four figures, etc.

According to TW, Woodrow, it was the $3m placing, and his piece is entitled:

'Sound Energy bailout $3m placing to keep lights on.. pro tem'

I don't know which article is being referred to.
The one I found online (only part of which I am permitted to read) contains the line:
'Today there was a final kick in the gonads for the mug punters suckered in by CEO James Parsons and others.'
I don't consider that to be a serious comment, but rather the kind of conspiracy theory nonsense so often penned by angry posters.