Member Info for longtimeinvestor

160 years

S1

HSBC give a return to shareholders, 4 times a year - an investment return

S1

Met1 is a pure gamble - HSBC which has been in existence for 165 years is not a pure gamble - simple

Learn

''What so no serious institutional investors with 5% plus?? That's a surprise 😮''

Met1 is mainly owned by gamblers - even the list which I assume was posted by M1 to indicate some institutional involvement include with the ones I looked at businesses given stockbroking client servives to individuals - in other words a nominee like Hargreaves or Aj Bell.

Onb

'' expenditure on dishes etc, analogous to MET1’s intangibles.''

?? physical assets are tangible - Met1 's intangibles are mainly costs involved in looking over an area which they are saying is an intangible asset on the books

'' will you be happy and leave us idiots in peace to pay over NAV once MET1 develops some revenues?''

I think you will find that most of my posts are responses to people naming me in their posts.

Revenues, from what?. They must be getting non business related revenue now - bank interest on it's cash-

Onb

Bskb no revenues? weird

they made losses until they built a good model, generating increasing revenues and profits,

absolutely stupid comparing functioning proper businesses with Met1 which has 1 employee.

Any business can for a period make a loss for whatever reason, even banks.

Met1 is not a functioning revenue generating business. It is a loss making business with tangible assets of about 1.75p per share.Met1 is mainly be owned by gamblers/dreamers/clueless, and it is those that will decide from day to day at which price they wish to exchange shares with each other at

Bow

'' I will be investing a furthrr 15 grand tomirrow ''

So you are going to buy about £6,000 worth of real assets. Sellers will be happy with you helping them out

''I think it can reach 12 pemce ''

That would be about a £100 million market cap with about £15 million of real assets.

The price per share can reach whatever gamblers are prepared to pay for about 1,75p of tangible assets per share.

Bow

'' I will be investing a furthrr 15 grand tomirrow ''

So you are going to buy about £6,000 worth of real assets. Sellers will be happy with you helping them out

''I think it can reach 12 pemce ''

That would be about a £100 million market cap with about £15 million of real assets.

The price per share can reach whatever gamblers are prepared to pay for about 1,75p of tangible assets per share.

HongKong and Shanghai Banking Corporation

JBatch

'' myself starting with the Hong Shanghai Banking Corp which was a Penny share at 12 pence''

I joined Hong Shanghai Banking Corporation before we took took over Midland, It was NOT a 'penny share' despite a low price per share. They went through a spell where they did a share split every year to keep a low price per share.

''Then few had heard of it''

HSBC was a banking goliath back then as it is now, operating in countless countries, but very little presence in the UK pre Midland. We probably only had about 6 or 7 branches located in places like Gerrard street, to give the Chinese community a very familiar name to do banking with and other similar locations in England and Scotland. Our main operations in the UK then was Foreign exchange. The UK operation only gives a small percentage of profits out of the global total.

Having worked at the bank for many years , and been a shareholder for decades, HSBC has the highest valuation in my portfolio. I benefitted from various share schemes/options whilst working there, and also I have bought a lot also in addition. I started getting my HSBC pension at the age of 50.

JS you must have 50 million fantasy shares by now -about 6% of Met1

Not long ago MAST had a market cap of less than £1 million.

I believe Maj ? mentioned (share price was about 60p-70? at the time) that they were raising money in the same way as Met1 did after a big share consolidation. Well it seems the same story is well under way, with the share price at 136p.

With lots of warrants convertible into shares at 4p a time to come, the question is for you gamblers is how much more will the share price be allowed to rise before the warrants start to be exercised.

btw the forward market cap is creeping towards £200 million- could it also go to £400 million as MET1 did.

As I have previously said, I don't do Aim and I certainly would not want to profit from dubious practices, but I am sure that there would be plenty on the Met1 board that would.

Dust

''you was calling EEE a terrible stock with a low valuation for Gamblers.''

''do I really need to go back and find it?''

I think you should don't you

btw this is the Met1 board

Dust

you need professional help, to evaluate the extent and seriousness of your issues

Onb

but if you based a 5p purchase against tangible assets then you have paid a very big percentage over tnav

Onb

''So yes, but what is the point you are trying to make?''

I had assumed that you were including the full £15 million when you said you were only overpaying 66%.

Of course if nav was 2.75p including assets that have no physical value and you had paid 5p? then of course that would mean more than 66% too much

Onb

they paid a £2million fee out of the money raised - probably something to do with the scam articles

Dust

make appointments with professionals for all of your issues

Dust

''you was calling EEE a terrible stock with a low valuation for Gamblers.''

??????????????????????

you are a waste of screen space

STILL waiting for an apology

Dust

you are a waste of screen space. Very very stupid and a serial liar -end of