Member Info for longtimeinvestor

Onb

if you want to include intangibles which in the case of Met1 are not even a brand/trademark value etc then

that would work out to no more than about 2.75p per share but have they have no physical value

Onb

if you want to include intangibles which in the case of Met1 are not even a brand/trademark value etc then

that would work out to no more than about 2.75p per share but have they have no physical value

Onb

''so at best I’ve paid 66% “too much” today.''

I assume you knew that the 750 million warrants didn't equate to raising £15 million

Dust

what is it you do not understand. If you cannot remember then you must have serious memory/dementia problems - simple

Onb

''Narvick is still a balance sheet asset''

I think you will find that people have been talking of tangible assets

Dust

''apologise for what''

you know what unless you have dementia problems as well to add to your other flaws.

Bats are one of the stocks that has given me fantastic returns. First buying in early 2000 and selling most up to peak prices.

Using some of the previous profits I started adding again in April 2021 making quite a few purchases up to April 2024.

Sold a few very recently.

The question is, will will see peak prices again - the yield is certainly still good at the current level

Onb

'' £2.9 investment in Narvik''

some gamblers 'invested' over 50p per share in met1

Onb

'' £2.9 investment in Narvik''

some gamblers 'invested' over 50p per share in met1

Onb

'' £5.9m “exploration and evaluation “ asset valuation''

not sure that there is much in the way of tangible assets there.

it is a question of whether costs are recouped

for your info

https://williambuck.com/news/business/general/what-are-exploration-and-evaluation-assets-and-how-are-they-measured/

Dust

have you been back to school yet?

you have a lot to learn

making nonsense posts will not alter that fact

STILL waiting for my apology

May as well repost due to typos

Onb

I have never predicted a share price, only what the tnav, mainly cash is.

The gamblers/dreamers/clueless will determine what they want to pay for that tnav - they control the share price.

It would require many many gamblers/dreamers/clueless to sell at a loss to get to 2p or a lower price.

some may decide to do so knowing the tnav in the hope of buying back at a tnav value or lower

''I have predicted a share price''

I have never predicted a share price,

Onb

I have predicted a share price, only what the tnav, mainly cash is.

The gamblers/dreamers/clueless will determine what that want to pay for that tnav - they control the share price,

It would require many many gamblers/dreamers/clueless to sell at a loss to get to 2p or a lower price.

some may decide to do so knowing the tnav if the hope of buying back at tnav value or lower

And

''Anyone seen 2p...nope thought not..''

very strange comment.

As I have said many times, it is the gamblers/dreamers/clueless tat will determine how much they pay for less than

2p in tnav - mainly cash

An extremely low number of gamblers/dreamers/clueless would be holding shares at a cost below the current price

Lots of momentum recently - what can go down can also go up.

No past much higher valuations can be ruled out for the future

Over 207p

Some of those bought for under 82p on 3rd Oct 22 for 207p

Shares in issue - 839,946,460

Issue of 750,000,000 shares to the most likely sponsors of scam articles costing 2p each is virtually complete

Met1 do pumping of stocks that they have gambled some money on just like the gamblers on here.

Market cap about £44.5 million

TNAV about £14 million - mainly cash.

Gamblers currently would have to pay over 5p for less than 2p in tangible assets - mainly cash

The price that needs to be paid per share in the future for the assets ( mainly cash) will be determined by the Gamblers/Dreamers/Clueless between themselves as it is those who will own the vast majority of shares

Crook

crooks some would say.

''they need to shaft shareholders to progress things''

Really? what about instead having a 750 million 2p per share open offer?

Gamblers have paid between about 4.5p and about 55p per share instead.

Do you not think then that they would not have paid 2p for all?

At the same time saving a £2 million fee