Member Info for longtimeinvestor

Mam

5 Aug 2025 16:25

''You can judge me by what happens over the next few weeks.''

6 Aug 2025 15:33

''Exactly as I foretold LT, came back kissed 80.04 (my stated level of resistance), bounced off and now heading upwards .

Not sure what more anyone can add following a 100% accurate prediction, however I’m sure you’ll come back with something other than an acknowledgement of a 100% accurate prediction.''

Charts 5 Aug 2025 16:02

''loyds resistance level had been 80p which it blitzed through to touch 82p where it was in over bought territory.

The pull back to day is exactly what you would have expected as 80p now becomes a level of support.

Except it to touch 80p over the next few days and from there head on upwards to 85p and the nineties over the coming weeks''

LTI

5 Aug 2025 16:13

'' ''80p now becomes a level of support.''

no such thing with future unknowns''

5 Aug 2025 19:43

I do make posts talking of ceiling/resistance levels - only respond to them as in '50 is just another number' - not interested in such things. If enough people invest using such methods then I am sure that certain level points can become self fulfilling for a period of time as people would take similar actions.

NC

''Remember Lloyds never paid every year, and when it did restart was low yield.''

lti

''£1 in 2000 compounded at 5% per year as an example would be £3.40p''

as an example was nothing to do with Lloyds - I haven't gone through 25 years of Lloyds dividends. A yield that could be compounded into further Lloyds shares would depend on an entry level and the price at which dividends could be reinvested at.

My purchase as an example about 5 years ago would have a dividend yield this year of about 15%.

Basically it would be very easy to have made investments with dividends reinvested in Lloyds and further ad hoc purchases to easily beat inflation.

Even very recently at 40p, I was saying over and over again that 15% total returns were available at that price level , forward dividends plus buyback. The capital value has obviously increased over 100% since.

Even you have got about a 35% capital increase on top of dividends, but you had not reinvested all dividends received at good price levels.

Capital invested does not automatically increase in line with inflation in addition to any returns received via dividends

''Holding cash would have been worse,''

stock market investments are the best protection against inflation.

''Scary with Lloyds being so UK dependant with this shower ruining the show.''

You do not have to hold Lloyds shares - it is not compulsory

No interest earned by banks on money held at the BOE would likely result in bank customers paying via lower saving rates, higher mortgage rates etc.

NC

'' don't be 'fooled' by a recent increase in s.p, much is to do with 'inflation' making the share price 'cost more' but not WORTH more, as 80p won't buy you what it did, IF a lth.''

£1 in 2000 is equivalent to £2.30p now

£1 in 2000 compounded at 5% per year as an example would be £3.40p

re Lloyds - even better if not a passive investor, with well timed purchases and sales.

For me personally this has resulted in my having an average Lloyds share price of 14.34p (excluding dividends).

Based on an estimated 2025 total dividend of 3.66p that equates to a yield of over 25%

GS

''The UK is heading for bankruptcy and the FTSE is at an all time high. Investors are either blind, ignorant or stupid''

Most of the ftse100 earnings are NON UK

Now retreating a lot from the moving average. Scam sellers must already be all but completely out.

Remaining warrants are an irrelevance.

Gamblers/dreamers/clueless now on their own to decide between themselves how much they wish to exchange shares at with each other that have a current backing of about 1.75p per share in tangible assets

M1

''I put the cash into Ithaca which has been shooting up and pays 11% dividends.''

The dividend yield is about 7.5% not 11%

Bow

''Youve changed your opinion LTI''

?? Once again - you need to expand your statement. I am not aware that I have changed my opinion about something - well?

Dan

''I haven't received any excess cash from the buybacks''

''the money they use to buy back the shares comes out of the market cap''

As dumb as ever I see

S88

''you know when it’s gonna go up when the idiots get desperate''

'' I for one believe this will have a big rise again''

start of your desperation out of losing half your gamble money at the moment, some would say

S88

''you know when it’s gonna go up when the idiots get desperate''

'' I for one believe this will have a big rise again''

start of your desperation out of losing half your gamble money at the moment, some would say

LTI

''Re MAST ?

I have never 'shorted' a share and probably never will.

IG is not allowing an open 'sell' for MAST, but if any of you gamblers used a company that is allowing it, then MAST having a similar scam in place as Met1 had could be a candidate for you? ''

Just noticed that the first of the new shares (4p) will be hitting the market tomorrow - Mast shares down

Onb

'' a discount to NAV, if we can ever ascertain it.''

best to look at Tnav - having the costs involved in evaluating an area of land as an asset in the books wouldn't wash with me.

TNAV is about 1.75p per share.

Their version of assets should be in their next report

/liquidity still high making matched trades still easy, but currently comfortably below the moving average.

Scam sellers should complete getting rid of their current batch of shares this week

Wild

''Hands up -you can count me amongst the dumb folks who were sucked in!''

don't worry about it, my friends were also sucked in from reading the scam articles. Well one was and the other also gambled due to competition between them/FOMO

Wild

''I'm not sure I'd trust this Board to run a bath.''

2 people registered the company about 4 years ago with £50,000 capital.

They are winging it at the expense of the gullible, but the people who have recently pumped money into Met1 have made a fortune from the scam

Wild

''when the shares hit 48p in May their were 91m shares in issue giving a market cap of £44m

With all the warrants the shares in issue are now 840m - at yesterday's closing price of 4.35p that gives a Mkt Cap of £36m

Every penny movement in share price adds £8.4m to the Mkt cap

So a price of 5.35p would take us back to the massively ramped up price back in May''

No, 48p would get it back to 48p - about a £400 million market cap.

There were many many dumb people about.

I always posted a forward market cap, which gave a proper level at which gamblers were gambling at.

There was always going to be 750 million new shares via warrants coming to the market, but the dumb piled in regardless.

Wild

''when the shares hit 48p in May their were 91m shares in issue giving a market cap of £44m

With all the warrants the shares in issue are now 840m - at yesterday's closing price of 4.35p that gives a Mkt Cap of £36m

Every penny movement in share price adds £8.4m to the Mkt cap

So a price of 5.35p would take us back to the massively ramped up price back in May''

No, 48p would get it back to 48p - about a £400 million market cap.

There were many many dumb people about.

I always posted a forward market cap, which gave a proper level at which gamblers were gambling at.

There was always going to be 750 million new shares via warrants coming to the market, but the dumb piled in regardless.

Onb

''LTI please spare us another lecture about how it's really 0.3p ''

? you have lost the plot - again