Member Info for longtimeinvestor

ONB

''Surely if someone had £6k to punt on this sort of nonsense at 4p, they would have bought 150,000 shares rather than only 20,000 and still possibly lost it all if the company actually goes bust?''

Anyone with an IQ higher than a fruit bat and want to put themselves in a positive frame of mind from the outset would be thinking that buying 20,000 at 4p they have 'saved' £5200 over what it would have cost them not long ago.

If I ever buy further shares in a stock at lower prices than I had previously purchased at, I would buy the same number of shares again, not spend the same amount - again, I would think that I have 'saved' some money against a previous expenditure.

''Or do you think people on this platform are so stupid they don't understand which company is worth more: one with a million issued share capital whose shares are trading at £1 each, or one with 100m shares trading at 5p?''

Haven't a clue what you are getting at, but there are many stupid people who have gambled on Met1.

Purchasing as an example at 50p and not having the intelligence to know that was effectively purchasing at a market cap of about £400 million rather than the market cap that would have been showing at the time (£25 million ?) on financial websites

''Or aren't your percentages up to it?''

once again, haven't a clue what you are getting at

ONB

''Surely if someone had £6k to punt on this sort of nonsense at 4p, they would have bought 150,000 shares rather than only 20,000 and still possibly lost it all if the company actually goes bust?''

Anyone with an IQ higher than a fruit bat and want to put themselves in a positive frame of mind from the outset would be thinking that buying 20,000 at 4p they have 'saved' £5200 over what it would have cost them not long ago.

If I ever buy further shares in a stock at lower prices than I had previously purchased at, I would buy the same number of shares again, not spend the same amount - again, I would think that I have 'saved' some money against a previous expenditure.

''Or do you think people on this platform are so stupid they don't understand which company is worth more: one with a million issued share capital whose shares are trading at £1 each, or one with 100m shares trading at 5p?''

Haven't a clue what you are getting at, but there are many stupid people who have gambled on Met1.

Purchasing as an example at 50p and not having the intelligence to know that was effectively purchasing at a market cap of about £400 million rather than the market cap that would have been showing at the time (£25 million ?) on financial websites

''Or aren't your percentages up to it?''

once again, haven't a clue what you are getting at

M1

''Very wise. They can be very risky, but think of the excitement if you did, and it took off.''

What excitement. I have made a fortune without touching Aim. I am not in need or an extra single penny.

ONB

Who mentioned percentages?

If someone was prepared to buy 20,000 at 30p, that is 30p per share that could be lost = £6,000

That compares with 20,000 at 4p, where 4p per share can be lost = £800

MrR

I have never bought any AIM stocks.

Only came to this board when the share price was high to state some facts after friends bought in at high prices are reading the scam articles.

Hopefully it helped at least one person in deciding not to buy at 30,20,10p etc per share.

At 4p gamblers have not so much per share that can be lost.

E

less than 1 million out of the 750 million

E

the tiny handful of warrants outstanding will have no relevance to the pricing of each share from here.

It is all down to gamblers how much they want to pay for 1.75p per share

MrR

They have the word 'Metals' in the 'business' name and also the word 'One'

This may give the impression to gamblers that they are no.1 when it comes to finding precious metals ,then mining them and then making Billions of profits. The reality is that they have been buying lottery tickets in the hope of a jackpot. An investment in a proper mining investment trust such as BRWM may be a better long term.# prospect. I would find it difficult to justify paying 4p for a Met1 share for a 1.75p gamble

MrR

''The tracking and detection of submarines is a fascinating subject and is fast developing as it is believed that the defence of the U.K.and other countries will be dependent of it.''

??

The enemy do not require submarines - they only need dinghies to invade England, but unfortunately there has been no defence against those that has been developed.

MrR

''The tracking and detection of submarines is a fascinating subject and is fast developing as it is believed that the defence of the U.K.and other countries will be dependent of it.''

??

The enemy do not require submarines - they only need dinghies to invade England, but unfortunately there has been no defence against those that has been developed.

MrR

''I get that, but dont get why the s.p. is still dropping, given all the recent investment at this stage of the game.''

They are gambling about 1.75p per share increasing the number of holdings of 'Met1 gamblers investment trust'

for which gamblers would have to pay 4p per share for that 1.75p gamble

GU

''So who owns the company " Thorn in the side"..''

That is Nigel's - has net assets of £2.6 million

GU

''So who owns the company " Thorn in the side"..''

That is Nigel's - has net assets of £2.6 million

With the current shares in issue the price per share would have to increase by 35% to reach a previous all time high market cap

With the current shares in issue the price per share would have to increase by 35% to reach a previous all time high market cap

As I have already said '

'Met1 gamblers investment trust'

a gambler can put money into similar things directly instead of currently paying 4.2p for a 1.75p investment elsewhere - a very big premium

For buyback pricings - not as good as in the 40's and 50's though

12 34

Re 12 24

I do NOT make posts talking of ceiling/resistance levels

Mam

trying to be a smart ass can backfire