Member Info for longtimeinvestor

D1

''Evolution up another 8% today''

More clutching at straws - still below the share price of a couple of weeks ago.

Met1 gamblers gave multiples of the net 1.75p cash raised to the warrant holders, meaning that any 1.75p invested by Met1 in it's investment portfolio would have to gain multiple times to even get back to the level that gamblers paid.

Met1 is STILL trading at a massive premium over tnav

At over 175p the shares bought 9 days ago.

I still hold shares .

JB

clutching at straws,

The FMET share price is actually double what MET1 paid giving an increase in valuation of £175,000 at the mid price.

This equates to about 0.02 of a penny per Met1 share, so I wouldn't get too excited.

Met1 gamblers though would have paid a fortune for that £175,000 investment .

As an example if warrant holders received an average 7p per share from gamblers then that means gamblers paid £700,000 for the £175,000 investment in Fulcrum

JB

clutching at straws,

The FMET share price is actually double what MET1 paid giving an increase in valuation of £175,000 at the mid price.

This equates to about 0.02 of a penny per Met1 share, so I wouldn't get too excited.

Met1 gamblers though would have paid a fortune for that £175,000 investment .

As an example if warrant holders received an average 7p per share from gamblers then that means gamblers paid £700,000 for the £175,000 investment in Fulcrum

Dust

''The support is known''

'' support level at 3.5p''

that is a 100% premium to tnav with a no revenue stock.

Dust

''I don't think you will see 3p''

'' support level at 3.5p''

that is a 100% premium to tnav with a no revenue stock.

Dust

''I don't think you will see 3p''

that is a 100% premium to tnav with a no revenue stock.

Vfm

the subject was on average prices - this can only be determined by purchase and sale levels

Vfm

''it would not be sensible to look at it as a 10p loss.''

of course it is a loss which can be used against capital gains for tax purposes,

My total income (a separate matter) is documented for tax purposes from my portfolio as a whole

NB

''Agree. Evolution energy up 20% today''

That recovers half the loss from the price of a couple of weeks ago

JS

''We don’t need your input .''

What factual input relating to Met1 and it's portfolio have you provided that would be of some use to other gamblers?

Hxc

''if someone had better ideas on how to deliver shareholder value.''

it is simply a waiting game.

I first invested near the start of 2000 and made an absolute fortune on the way to all time highs.

More recently I have been investing some of the previous vast profits that I took, and expect in time to once again to have made a very well worthwhile investments CLS. I would invest more and more if ever decreasing share prices presented themselves. The discount from the NAV level is monumental. Underlying property valuations cannot continue to recede year after year after year.

Hxc

''if someone had better ideas on how to deliver shareholder value.''

it is simply a waiting game.

I first invested near the start of 2000 and made an absolute fortune on the way to all time highs.

More recently I have been investing some of the previous vast profits that I took, and expect in time to once again to have made a very well worthwhile investments CLS. I would invest more and more if ever decreasing share prices presented themselves. The discount from the NAV level is monumental. Underlying property valuations cannot continue to recede year after year after year.

Dust

what record has been broken today?

why are you here - you said that you would come back at the end of the year - that was months ago.

You also went along with peoples gambling of this stock when it was at a much higher price high price.

Dust

what record has been broken today?

why are you here - you said that you would come back at the end of the year - that was months ago.

You also went along with peoples gambling of this stock when it was at a much higher price high price.

A £175,000 investment into FMET by Mrt1 would have cost Met1 gamblers a lot more than double that amount with share purchases in Met1.

Im

''Fulcrum’s very promising news on the Progress of its tailings retrieval process''

it is not fmet's process. It is a process that they want to use that has been developed by another company.

I am afraid a tiny capital valuation increase in Fmet minus a greater loss in value with Evolution does not equate to an increase in the Met1 valuation of about £4.8 million.

Ntc

''Is it news or is it th natural progression of an undervalued share getting rid of warrants?''

No big share moving news.

It is the natural progression of new gamblers (or top ups) coming in at what they see as a level at which they can make a few pounds at by then selling off to other gamblers before what they think will be the next fall. This is bound to happen when a new recent low is reached. Obviously it was a big gamble purchasing at just over a 100% premium to tnav first thing to achieve that.

'' hardly warrants about a £1.6 million (currently) increase in the Met1 valuation especially with EV1 going down to a rights issue price''

now £3.3 million