Member Info for longtimeinvestor

ONB

''The valuation gaps I have been asking you to address are between the intrinsic value of your house, or a penny black''

and YET AGAIN - you have lost your mind and the plot. The plot does not include house and PB values. This is the Met1 board. I suggest you find a general board to discuss the values of such things. Understand?

JB

Why is 1.75p worth 4p in a NO revenue stock?

JB

Why is 1.75p worth 4p in a NO revenue stock?

JB

don't talk ballax and DON'T take me for a fool you complete and utter idiot .

JB

oh dear - and the point of your first post using your new additional id. was?.

''whilst insulting me calling me a gambler''

how pathetic you are - anyone having bought Met1 at 4p or up to 55p with 1.75p of tnav is not only a gambler but is totally stupid.

I repeat - the point of your first post using your new additional id. was?

JB

''Great potential on MET1 after hours of research''

what were your findings from your research that justified a gambler currently having to pay about 4p for 1.75p of tnav ?

Onb

''But once the traders are out, what are the prospects? ''

WTF - most of the shares are held by traders/gamblers and that will remain the case for a VERY long time to come, unless bankruptcy comes before that very long time.

Onb

''you revealed yourself to be completely ignorant''

what that really means is that in your own mind I am ignorant of things but in reality that does not make it a fact. In fact you are incorrect.

''you have nothing to say, like the gaps between market valuations and intrinsic value''

FFS you mind has completely gone - I must have given the difference/gaps a hundred times.

Ben

''and bet farage 9/2''

I am assuming that is to be the next PM - that would take into account the possibility that Labour could replace Starmer before the next GE with someone else and thus the next PM.

To get down the number of illegals in the country

https://dailysceptic.org/2025/09/20/somalian-migrant-living-in-epping-hotel-thanks-keir-starmer-from-the-bottom-of-my-heart-after-winning-right-to-stay-in-uk/

Wow, just wow - odds on.

https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/politics/market/1.230583324

Onb

btw the market is 'valuing' Met1 currently at 4p because there are very few shares bought at 2p left to sell at a profit.

The vast majority of Met1 is owned by gamblers who have paid between about 3.5 and 55p.

Onb

btw the market is 'valuing' Met1 currently at 4p because there are very few shares bought at 2p left to sell at a profit.

The vast majority of Met1 is owned by gamblers who have paid between about 3.5 and 55p.

Onb

''Until you can rationalise the gaps between the intrinsic value of houses and penny blacks''

and yet AGAIN - you have seriously lost the plot

''people are currently buying and selling these shares to make them “worth” 4p ''

1.75p is not worth 4p. It shows how many stupid gullible people were around that paid up to about 55p for 1.75p purely on the back of scam articles.

Better to have gambled 3.5 - 55p in the likes of EV1, CTL and FMET rather than pay 3.5 - 55p for a 1.75p gamble in EV1 , CTL and FMET.

Can you imagine a fund or investment trust that is trading at between a 100 and 3000% premium to underlying assets where an investor could directly invest in the underlying assets. NO, it simply would not happen.

Onb

''What’s your answer to house prices and penny blacks?''

You have lost the PLOT

Onb

''How about addressing the comparisons between house prices and Penny Blacks’ intrinsic values''

You have lost the PLOT

JS

''if this is goes belly up ( very slim chance!) it won’t make a blind bit of difference to my lifestyle .''

I would think not - losing £2,000 would not be the end of the world for most gamblers.

ONB

'' before LTI tells us for the nth time about NAVs, remember ...........''

''This is what LTI fails to grasp about stock market psychology/stupidity as he rails into the void.''

As clueless as ever I see. I think you will find that for example, a 7p gamble in EV1 would have been far better than paying 7p for 1.75p of cash in Met1, for that 1.75p to then be invested in EV1.

That goes for all the other 1.75p's bought by Met1 gamblers.

7p of course is about a 300% premium to Met1's tnav.

I wouldn't know what the average price gamblers paid for the hundreds om millions of warrant holders shares - it may have been a good amount more than 7p.

That is why it is important that gamblers realise that they are buying about 1.75p of assets for each Met1 share purchased.

Met1 made a 2024 loss of £1,621,270

Enough cash now to help with directors gravy train for a good amount of time.

A director purchase no matter how small .

Bow

''You me and Jbatch should fly to Chile site in your private plane to survey exciting Met projectt JS''

You are still waiting for a response from JS I see .