RE: North Sea Operated assets decline profile23 Oct 2020 16:03
Hi Crack,
afraid I don't have any specifics am sure someone will assist, however PMO are in a lot better position on that score than Chrysoar, from what I have read in various places, the reverse takeover is for more than just the $4B tax losses, apparently Chrysoars North Sea assets are in decline and you cannot keep on picking up end of life producing assets for ever, hence the costs savings and synergies with PMO along with their toes in other parts of the world.
Of course another reason will no doubt be for the original investors behind Chrysoar to have an opportunity to sell their stakes and get their money out of the company. My feeling though is the bigger shareholders won't just jump ship as soon as. If this deal is done in 1st Q 2021 into a Covid Vaccine, reducing numbers of infected and a rising oil price, I imagine the big share holders will hold on at least for a little while to get the share price up with it's peers. Let's face it, oil companies have really cut down on capex and become very lean stripped down businesses to survive. Once oil gets into the high $40's/$50's the profits will be impressive for sure.
The NEW PMO has aspirations to be more international and pay a DIV, this again is a great way to get money out of the company. Sale of ZAMA will reduce debt (I feel it will be sold, Mexico and its nationalistic vibes of late would make it not worth the risk, and partnering with an indebted national oil company would have it's own problems), then possibly move forward with Sea Lion in the Falklands as lets face it, in the next few years, who would invest in wild cat exploration when there is a project worth 100k+ barrels a day that could be churning out $$$$$$$ in a stable lucrative fiscal regime. IMHO
But who knows, the web cast had them all talking the talk about the future, but once the contract is signed who knows.
LTT