Member Info for londondan

1.5p seems highly likely at this rate, from which point those of us who 'averaged down' to 3p need a bag just to break even. Those who bought way, way higher are already likely to be too far underwater to be salvageable. There are still a handful of them posting here, although even the rampiest few have dramatically slowed down their output.

I'm in the same camp as horse.mouth - write it off as a loss and assume it's going to zero at some point.

"come on folks, no point having a go at each other"

It's all good fun. I admire him really - he doesn't let things like having a room temperature IQ get in the way of his ham-fisted attempts at humour.

It's not the VR competitors we now need to worry about unfortunately. With music streaming we're now in an extremely competitive and well-funded market.

If we were being charitable, we could say that the promises about a big marketing campaign kicking off have underwhelmed a little thus far. The app can't afford to underwhelm in the same fashion. It needs to land on time, on budget and to seriously impress the market. Our current share price suggests that the market isn't confident about this team's ability to deliver a truly game changing offering.

Your latest petulant little post was rather light on examples of anything that might prove me wrong. We both know why that is.

Got any more theories for us on our IR company's 'M&A file'? It's been a while since we all had something to laugh about on here...

"Has anyone seen anything significant outside of the investor presentation?"

In short, no.

Yes, dreadful as expected, which won't surprise anyone. Not likely to make a big difference though I wouldn't have thought, given it's pre-Napster.

Lol, whilst any group set up because of alleged 'paid derampers' on here is bound to be guaranteed comedy gold, I can't be bothered downloading Telegram for the pleasure. Let me know when someone starts a 'sack the CEO and appoint someone capable of running this business properly, for the benefit of its shareholders' group.

Agreed Mooney. McNulty paints a grim but realistic picture about just how badly the leadership team have screwed up with this financing. Yet another symptom of the inexperienced management we have here.

They, and by extension we as shareholders, have been well and truly taken for a ride.

"Do you have anything insightful to say"

Well I was going to post a load of pie in the sky, baseless speculation about M&A and a potential 'take out', but I see you covered that over the weekend. Ho hum.

Yes, another roaring day on the markets for this unstoppable juggernaut. Must be the shockwaves from that industry-changing marketing campaign they launched last month.

You have to laugh.

You must have me confused with your tutor. Whilst you'd clearly benefit from some further education, you're not going to find it here flower.

It's a well known phrase. Look it up. As with the various instances of your poor research and market understanding, we're not here to spoonfeed you.

"What does it mean exactly ??"

I don't think I've ever encountered anyone who wears their bovine ignorance as a badge of honour quite like you do Albert. Pretty extraordinary really.

"I know I was certainly still hopeful that they'd drop something today too."

The triumph of optimism over experience unfortunately.

"we are not allowed to say we turned it down on here"

Of course you are. Just don't be surprised when you then get ridiculed for making stuff up, which is exactly what you're doing.

'I heard Melody turned Glastonbury down'

LOL. We've had some very obviously made up, cloud cuckoo land rampy nonsense on this board over the last year or so, but that might be the best yet. Tremendous.

You're wasting your time if you're expecting this company to communicate consistently, coherently and/or competently (that's a lot of c's...) with its shareholders Max. I don't get the impression that the CEO is a fan of having to justify his decisions and actions, in turn opening them up to scrutiny or criticism.

"Caught you again Londondan"

You couldn't catch a cold fella. The subject of this thread, which you started, is 'Who Are Drift?' Utterly clueless, as ever.

Mooney - I'm definitely not averaging down any further. It's good money after bad at this point.

"Come on Londondan, answer it"

Haha! Imagine thinking that you have the authority to demand anything of anyone. For the avoidance of doubt, you don't.

There's no point throwing another multi-post tantrum because you've been made to look silly again. If you're going to do some research on Driift, I suggest you go a little further than just copy & pasting the dictionary definition of the word 'drift'.

Lol, yes I thought I'd get a stroppy, pathetic response like that.

Stay on topic and leave out the personal insults, or don't bother commenting at all. Either is fine.

"Derampers would say that this is approx 4 times smaller than the Driift's number."

Not just 'derampers'; I think mathematicians and those with access to calculators would probably agree...

"Just because some events are now going ahead does not mean MVR/Napster are going to cover any of them and no, they will not be covering Glastonbury, that's is a fact (BBC have them rights)."

HG you're right about this of course. Although, Glastonbury is also broadcasting a live-streamed event this weekend. Needless to say we're nothing to do with it, but can you guess which streaming company is? I'll give you a clue - they have a new partnership with Spotify and Albert has never heard of them.

Our 'great partners' O2 are involved as well...

https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/o2-partners-glastonbury-livestream-concert-its-customers/1716621